CA|RDS Lite: A rapid assessment of site management against the Conservation Assured | River Dolphin Standards

Q1 Environmental Science Parks Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.2305/thyc4522
Uzma Khan, N. Dudley, Daphne Willems, Michael Baltzer, S. Stolton, M.K.S. Pasha, Hannah L. Timmins, Diane Walkington, Paul André Van Damme
{"title":"CA|RDS Lite: A rapid assessment of site management against the Conservation Assured | River Dolphin Standards","authors":"Uzma Khan, N. Dudley, Daphne Willems, Michael Baltzer, S. Stolton, M.K.S. Pasha, Hannah L. Timmins, Diane Walkington, Paul André Van Damme","doi":"10.2305/thyc4522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces the inaugural rapid evaluation of river dolphin habitats, coinciding with managed sites in Asia and South America. Covering all six river dolphin species (including the sole freshwater porpoise worldwide), each is classified as Endangered or Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List. The Conservation Assured | River Dolphin Standards (CA|RDS) offer tailored guidelines for the proficient oversight of protected areas for river dolphins. The abbreviated CA|RDS version, termed CA|RDS Lite, involves a questionnaire-based survey conducted by managers and stakeholders at 40 sites across 10 of the 14 countries within the river dolphin range. Both continents face river dolphin endangerment from fishing and climate change. In Asia, risks are more diverse, with smaller populations compared to South America. Insufficient funding and management capacity emerge as significant hurdles. Inadequate collaboration with areas outside the protected area boundary impedes effective river dolphin population management. Encouragingly, the survey highlights active involvement of local communities and stakeholders in site management. CA|RDS Lite offers a quick overview of site management efficacy, pinpointing crucial management requirements and urgent river dolphin sites necessitating intervention. It also sets the stage for the complete application of CA|RDS standards and their use as an accreditation and management instrument.","PeriodicalId":37571,"journal":{"name":"Parks","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2305/thyc4522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces the inaugural rapid evaluation of river dolphin habitats, coinciding with managed sites in Asia and South America. Covering all six river dolphin species (including the sole freshwater porpoise worldwide), each is classified as Endangered or Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List. The Conservation Assured | River Dolphin Standards (CA|RDS) offer tailored guidelines for the proficient oversight of protected areas for river dolphins. The abbreviated CA|RDS version, termed CA|RDS Lite, involves a questionnaire-based survey conducted by managers and stakeholders at 40 sites across 10 of the 14 countries within the river dolphin range. Both continents face river dolphin endangerment from fishing and climate change. In Asia, risks are more diverse, with smaller populations compared to South America. Insufficient funding and management capacity emerge as significant hurdles. Inadequate collaboration with areas outside the protected area boundary impedes effective river dolphin population management. Encouragingly, the survey highlights active involvement of local communities and stakeholders in site management. CA|RDS Lite offers a quick overview of site management efficacy, pinpointing crucial management requirements and urgent river dolphin sites necessitating intervention. It also sets the stage for the complete application of CA|RDS standards and their use as an accreditation and management instrument.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CA|RDS Lite:根据 "保护有保证|河豚标准 "对遗址管理进行快速评估
本文介绍了首次河豚栖息地快速评估,与亚洲和南美洲的管理地点相吻合。在世界自然保护联盟(IUCN)的红色名录中,河豚被列为濒危或极危物种,涵盖了全部六种河豚(包括全球唯一的淡水江豚)。保护有保证的河豚标准》(CA|RDS)为河豚保护区的有效监管提供了量身定制的指导方针。CA|RDS 简化版(CA|RDS Lite)涉及管理者和利益相关者在河豚分布的 14 个国家中的 10 个国家的 40 个地点进行的问卷调查。两大洲都面临着渔业和气候变化对河豚造成的威胁。与南美洲相比,亚洲的风险更为多样,种群数量更少。资金和管理能力不足是主要障碍。与保护区边界以外地区的合作不足阻碍了对河豚种群的有效管理。令人鼓舞的是,调查强调了当地社区和利益相关者积极参与遗址管理。CA|RDS简易版可快速了解现场管理的有效性,指出关键的管理要求和急需干预的河豚地点。它还为 CA|RDS 标准的全面应用及其作为认证和管理工具的使用奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parks
Parks Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: We aim for PARKS to be a rigorous, challenging publication with high academic credibility and standing. But at the same time the journal is and should remain primarily a resource for people actively involved in establishing and managing protected areas, under any management category or governance type. We aim for the majority of papers accepted to include practical management information. We also work hard to include authors who are involved in management but do not usually find the time to report the results of their research and experience to a wider audience. We welcome submissions from people whose written English is imperfect as long as they have interesting research to report, backed up by firm evidence, and are happy to work with authors to develop papers for the journal. PARKS is published with the aim of strengthening international collaboration in protected area development and management by: • promoting understanding of the values and benefits derived from protected areas to governments, communities, visitors, business etc; • ensuring that protected areas fulfil their primary role in nature conservation while addressing critical issues such as ecologically sustainable development, social justice and climate change adaptation and mitigation; • serving as a leading global forum for the exchange of information on issues relating to protected areas, especially learning from case studies of applied ideas; • publishing articles reporting on recent applied research that is relevant to protected area management; • changing and improving protected area management, policy environment and socio-economic benefits through use of information provided in the journal; and • promoting IUCN’s work on protected areas.
期刊最新文献
Clarifying ‘long-term’ for protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs): why only 25 years of ‘intent’ does not qualify The World Heritage Convention, Protected Areas and Rivers: Challenges for Representation and Implications for International Water Cooperation A crisis of moral ecology: Magar agro-pastoralism in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal The benefits of the IUCN Green List in implementing effective park management in Queensland, Australia Nudging to glory: the World Heritage Convention’s influence in conflict-prone Global South natural sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1