The Role of Good Will in Redefining Ownership Rights: The Bona Fides Purchaser

Muhammad Faisal
{"title":"The Role of Good Will in Redefining Ownership Rights: The Bona Fides Purchaser","authors":"Muhammad Faisal","doi":"10.1515/eplj-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"15Abstract This article explores the role of bona fides as the foundation of a purchaser’s ownership. A bona fide purchaser owns his rights against nemo dat quod non habet (no one gives what they do not have) maxim that protect the original owner’s rights. This article illustrates that the concept of good will in property rights as a means of resolving ownership disputes. Bona fides bear inner-directed values described as ‘good will’ in ethics and its practice in court’s verdict bear resemblance with outer-directed moral imperatives in property rights. The main issue of ownership then relies on the value that lives in social society, and whether it conforms with nemo dat principles or honest purchaser protection. While both maxims are needed for security of acquisition, its universality is still debatable. The concept of good will and property theory will show a different paradigm useful for court to justify honest purchaser rights acquired from an unauthorised seller. Courts will then construct and apply a standard of conduct based on the existing value to determine an honest purchaser. Hence, an honest purchaser will have an equal stage in the contest for ownership rights against a true owner, and courts will have to measure and determine whose ownership should be prioritize.","PeriodicalId":338086,"journal":{"name":"European Property Law Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"15 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Property Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

15Abstract This article explores the role of bona fides as the foundation of a purchaser’s ownership. A bona fide purchaser owns his rights against nemo dat quod non habet (no one gives what they do not have) maxim that protect the original owner’s rights. This article illustrates that the concept of good will in property rights as a means of resolving ownership disputes. Bona fides bear inner-directed values described as ‘good will’ in ethics and its practice in court’s verdict bear resemblance with outer-directed moral imperatives in property rights. The main issue of ownership then relies on the value that lives in social society, and whether it conforms with nemo dat principles or honest purchaser protection. While both maxims are needed for security of acquisition, its universality is still debatable. The concept of good will and property theory will show a different paradigm useful for court to justify honest purchaser rights acquired from an unauthorised seller. Courts will then construct and apply a standard of conduct based on the existing value to determine an honest purchaser. Hence, an honest purchaser will have an equal stage in the contest for ownership rights against a true owner, and courts will have to measure and determine whose ownership should be prioritize.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
善意在重新定义所有权中的作用:善意购买者
15 摘要 本文探讨了善意作为购买者所有权基础的作用。善意购买者拥有的权利不受保护原所有者权利的 nemo dat quod non habet(没有人给予他们没有的东西)格言的约束。本文阐述了产权中的善意概念是解决所有权纠纷的一种手段。善意在伦理学中被描述为 "善意",具有内在导向的价值,其在法院判决中的实践与产权中外在导向的道德要求相似。因此,所有权的主要问题取决于社会生活中的价值,以及它是否符合 "无主物 "原则或诚实购买者保护原则。虽然购置安全需要这两种格言,但其普遍性仍有待商榷。善意的概念和财产理论将为法院证明从未经授权的卖方处获得的诚实购买者权利提供不同的范式。然后,法院将根据现有价值构建和应用行为标准,以确定诚实的购买者。因此,诚实的购买者在与真正的所有者争夺所有权时将享有平等的地位,而法院则必须衡量和确定谁的所有权更优先。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial – Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Spain Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Sweden Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in the Netherlands Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1