A Systematic Overview of Decision-Making on Public Transport Systems Using Bibliometric Analysis on Vosviewer

IF 1.1 Q3 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Transport and Telecommunication Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.2478/ttj-2023-0036
Süleyman Nurullah Adahi Şahin
{"title":"A Systematic Overview of Decision-Making on Public Transport Systems Using Bibliometric Analysis on Vosviewer","authors":"Süleyman Nurullah Adahi Şahin","doi":"10.2478/ttj-2023-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract From the perspectives of users, operators, and the community, decision making for public transportation is regarded as one of the most crucial characteristics to assess quality, ease and preferable. Studies on the decision-making for public transportation have been published. Comprehensive and quantitative investigations are lacking, nevertheless. Additionally, the Scopus database contains very few assessments of public transport integration. The current evaluation was carried out to provide scholars and practitioners with the most recent updates of papers on public transport and decision-making over the last 18 years (between 2005 and 2023), to allay their worries and address their inquiries about better public transport systems. The purpose of this bibliometric analysis and the overview is to encourage future research and collaboration by illuminating the idea of transport decision making studies, highlighting the paucity of relevant works, and providing a summary of the most productive nations, journals, and institutions in the field. A bibliometric analysis of the publications on public transportation and decision-making obtained from the Scopus database was carried out using the VOSviewer software. This allowed researchers to trace the historical and annual records of publications related to decision making covering the top countries, institutions, journals, most frequently used keywords, authors, citation network analysis, and most cited publications. The analysis’s findings identify the indications and interesting issues spots as well as the publications’ remarkable annual rise in decision-making on public transportation systems.","PeriodicalId":44110,"journal":{"name":"Transport and Telecommunication Journal","volume":"291 3 1","pages":"459 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport and Telecommunication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2023-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract From the perspectives of users, operators, and the community, decision making for public transportation is regarded as one of the most crucial characteristics to assess quality, ease and preferable. Studies on the decision-making for public transportation have been published. Comprehensive and quantitative investigations are lacking, nevertheless. Additionally, the Scopus database contains very few assessments of public transport integration. The current evaluation was carried out to provide scholars and practitioners with the most recent updates of papers on public transport and decision-making over the last 18 years (between 2005 and 2023), to allay their worries and address their inquiries about better public transport systems. The purpose of this bibliometric analysis and the overview is to encourage future research and collaboration by illuminating the idea of transport decision making studies, highlighting the paucity of relevant works, and providing a summary of the most productive nations, journals, and institutions in the field. A bibliometric analysis of the publications on public transportation and decision-making obtained from the Scopus database was carried out using the VOSviewer software. This allowed researchers to trace the historical and annual records of publications related to decision making covering the top countries, institutions, journals, most frequently used keywords, authors, citation network analysis, and most cited publications. The analysis’s findings identify the indications and interesting issues spots as well as the publications’ remarkable annual rise in decision-making on public transportation systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 Vosviewer 上的文献计量分析对公共交通系统决策进行系统概述
摘要 从用户、运营商和社区的角度来看,公共交通决策被认为是评估公共交通质量、便捷性和可取性的最关键特征之一。有关公共交通决策的研究已经发表。但还缺乏全面的定量调查。此外,Scopus 数据库中关于公共交通一体化的评估也非常少。本次评估旨在为学者和从业人员提供过去 18 年(2005 年至 2023 年)有关公共交通和决策的最新论文,以消除他们的担忧,解决他们对更好的公共交通系统的疑问。本文献计量分析和综述旨在通过阐明交通决策研究的理念,强调相关著作的匮乏,并总结该领域最有成果的国家、期刊和机构,从而鼓励未来的研究与合作。我们使用 VOSviewer 软件对 Scopus 数据库中有关公共交通和决策的出版物进行了文献计量分析。这样,研究人员就可以追踪与决策相关的出版物的历史和年度记录,其中包括最主要的国家、机构、期刊、最常用的关键词、作者、引文网络分析以及被引用次数最多的出版物。分析结果确定了公共交通系统决策方面的迹象和有趣的问题点,以及出版物每年显著增加的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport and Telecommunication Journal
Transport and Telecommunication Journal TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scripting Scenarios of Pedestrian Behavior in a Computer Simulator of Security Monitoring System: A Practitioner’s Perspective Phantomatic Road Works in Poland: A View from a Dashboard Cam Development and Practical Application of Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Selection of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers Analysing Distribution Approaches for Efficient Urban Logistics Optimizing Voyage Costs in Maritime Supply Chains: A Holistic Approach Towards Logistics Service Improvement and Supply Chain Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1