Anti-Müllerian hormone and HOMA-IR in different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome on insulin resistance

Murat Önal, Halime Çalı Öztürk
{"title":"Anti-Müllerian hormone and HOMA-IR in different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome on insulin resistance","authors":"Murat Önal, Halime Çalı Öztürk","doi":"10.38053/acmj.1323489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To examine the link between serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods: This retrospective study included 120 patients aged 18-30 who visited our polyclinics between June 2021 and December 2022. Patients were divided into four groups based on the Rotterdam criteria for PCOS phenotypes. A control group of 24 individuals was also included. Clinical data, hormonal profiles, and metabolic parameters were obtained from medical records. Results: There were significant differences in AMH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels among the PCOS phenotypes and control group. AMH levels were highest in phenotype 1 (oligo/anovulation + hyperandrogenism + polycystic ovaries) and lowest in the control group. FSH were highest in phenotype 4 (oligo/anovulation + polycystic ovaries) and lowest in the control group. LH were highest in phenotype 2 (oligo/anovulation + hyperandrogenism). HOMA-IR was highest in phenotype 1. However, there were no significant differences in AMH or HOMA-IR levels among the PCOS phenotypes. Conclusion: Our study found hormone level differences among PCOS phenotypes but no significant differences in AMH or HOMA-IR. This suggests AMH may not distinguish between phenotypes and insulin resistance may not differ significantly among phenotypes.","PeriodicalId":307693,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1323489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To examine the link between serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods: This retrospective study included 120 patients aged 18-30 who visited our polyclinics between June 2021 and December 2022. Patients were divided into four groups based on the Rotterdam criteria for PCOS phenotypes. A control group of 24 individuals was also included. Clinical data, hormonal profiles, and metabolic parameters were obtained from medical records. Results: There were significant differences in AMH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels among the PCOS phenotypes and control group. AMH levels were highest in phenotype 1 (oligo/anovulation + hyperandrogenism + polycystic ovaries) and lowest in the control group. FSH were highest in phenotype 4 (oligo/anovulation + polycystic ovaries) and lowest in the control group. LH were highest in phenotype 2 (oligo/anovulation + hyperandrogenism). HOMA-IR was highest in phenotype 1. However, there were no significant differences in AMH or HOMA-IR levels among the PCOS phenotypes. Conclusion: Our study found hormone level differences among PCOS phenotypes but no significant differences in AMH or HOMA-IR. This suggests AMH may not distinguish between phenotypes and insulin resistance may not differ significantly among phenotypes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗缪勒氏管激素和 HOMA-IR 在多囊卵巢综合征不同表型的胰岛素抵抗中的作用
目的:研究多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)不同表型的血清抗苗勒氏管激素(AMH)水平与胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)之间的联系。 研究方法这项回顾性研究纳入了 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在我院综合门诊就诊的 120 名 18-30 岁患者。根据多囊卵巢综合征表型的鹿特丹标准,患者被分为四组。对照组有 24 人。临床数据、激素水平和代谢参数均来自医疗记录。 结果显示多囊卵巢综合征表型组和对照组的 AMH、促卵泡激素(FSH)、促黄体生成素(LH)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)水平存在明显差异。表型 1(少排卵/无排卵+高雄激素+多囊卵巢)的 AMH 水平最高,而对照组的 AMH 水平最低。FSH在表型4(少排卵/无排卵+多囊卵巢)中最高,在对照组中最低。LH在表型2(少排卵/无排卵+雄激素过多)中最高。表型 1 的 HOMA-IR 值最高。然而,多囊卵巢综合症表型之间的 AMH 或 HOMA-IR 水平没有明显差异。 结论我们的研究发现 PCOS 表型之间存在激素水平差异,但 AMH 或 HOMA-IR 无明显差异。这表明 AMH 可能无法区分不同的表型,而胰岛素抵抗在不同表型之间也可能没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pan-immune inflammation value as a biomarker in ankylosing spondilitis and associated with disease activity ChatGPT in medical writing: enhancing healthcare communication through artificial intelligence and human expertise Temporal alterations in P-wave electrocardiographic metrics post patent foramen ovale closure: a retrospective study Asymptomatic COVID-19 and structural changes in the brain Exploring the nexus: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical correlations of urinary tract infections in diabetes mellitus patients - a comprehensive retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1