ISSUES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF PUBLIC OPINION STUDY

Azizjon Yuldoshev
{"title":"ISSUES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF PUBLIC OPINION STUDY","authors":"Azizjon Yuldoshev","doi":"10.51788/tsul.jurisprudence.3.5./orfk6897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The article examines the legislation and practice of Uzbekistan, international standards, and foreign experience in studying public opinion. The purpose of the study is to improve the legal basis of this process and eliminate existing shortcomings. During the study of national legislation, it was established that the concept of “studying public opinion” needs to be improved, the procedure for its implementation has not been developed, the forms and means of its implementation are accordingly absent from scientific circulation and have not been applied according to their meaning, and other problems have been identified. Views, practices, and regulations about public opinion and its study were studied through analysis, functional, structural, comparative, formal, legal, and other methods. As a result, the content of public opinion and its study were revealed, and the definition in national legislation of the general rules of this process was justified, including the need to determine the information that should be published to assess the quality and impartiality of the results of the study and the need to prohibit their publication during a referendum and on the day before it starts. The author put forward a proposal to entrust the Association of Sociologists of Uzbekistan and the Central Election Commission with the development of methodological recommendations for the study of public opinion and control over the implementation of these recommendations and legal norms in this area with the election commissions.\"","PeriodicalId":501391,"journal":{"name":"Jurisprudence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.jurisprudence.3.5./orfk6897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"The article examines the legislation and practice of Uzbekistan, international standards, and foreign experience in studying public opinion. The purpose of the study is to improve the legal basis of this process and eliminate existing shortcomings. During the study of national legislation, it was established that the concept of “studying public opinion” needs to be improved, the procedure for its implementation has not been developed, the forms and means of its implementation are accordingly absent from scientific circulation and have not been applied according to their meaning, and other problems have been identified. Views, practices, and regulations about public opinion and its study were studied through analysis, functional, structural, comparative, formal, legal, and other methods. As a result, the content of public opinion and its study were revealed, and the definition in national legislation of the general rules of this process was justified, including the need to determine the information that should be published to assess the quality and impartiality of the results of the study and the need to prohibit their publication during a referendum and on the day before it starts. The author put forward a proposal to entrust the Association of Sociologists of Uzbekistan and the Central Election Commission with the development of methodological recommendations for the study of public opinion and control over the implementation of these recommendations and legal norms in this area with the election commissions."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舆论研究的法律规范问题
"文章研究了乌兹别克斯坦在研究民意方面的立法和实践、国际标准和外国经验。研究的目的是完善这一程序的法律基础,消除现有缺陷。在对国家立法进行研究的过程中发现,"舆论研究 "的概念有待完善,其实施程序尚未制定,实施的形式和手段也相应缺乏科学性,没有按照其意义加以应用,还发现了其他问题。通过分析法、功能法、结构法、比较法、形式法、法律法等方法研究了有关舆论及其研究的观点、实践和规定。结果,揭示了舆论及其研究的内涵,并证明了在国家立法中对这一过程的一般规则的定义是合理的,包括有必要确定为评估研究结果的质量和公正性而应公布的信息,以及有必要禁止在全民公决期间和全民公决开始前一天公布这些信息。作者建议委托乌兹别克斯坦社会学家协会和中央选举委员会制定研究民意的方法建议,并与选举委员会一起监督这些建议和该领域法律规范的执行情况"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transitional justice for foxes: conflict, pluralism & the politics of compromise Human rights after Deleuze: towards an an-archic jurisprudence Foundations of institutional reality Foundations of institutional reality , by Andrei Marmor, New York, Oxford University Press, 2023, 176 p., 75 GBP (hardback), ISBN: 9780197657348 The normative structure of constitutional rights: the expansionist trend and the spectre of utilitarianism Bernard Williams’ legitimate authority between universalism and relativism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1