Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Dalam Pengadaan Material Kapur Menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (Studi Kasus PT. Aneka Jasa Grhadika)

Evie Talia Nurrohmah, Yanuar Pandu Negoro, Mohammad Jufriyanto
{"title":"Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Dalam Pengadaan Material Kapur Menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (Studi Kasus PT. Aneka Jasa Grhadika)","authors":"Evie Talia Nurrohmah, Yanuar Pandu Negoro, Mohammad Jufriyanto","doi":"10.32672/jse.v8i4.6828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PT Aneka Jasa Grhadika is a company that focuses on the Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) sector. They are highly committed to maintaining the quality of their products with the aim of providing trust and satisfaction to customers. To manufacture its products, the company adopts three main production systems, namely Make to Order (MTO), Assembly to Order (ATO), and Engineering to Order (ETO). They are very committed to maintaining the quality of their products with the aim of providing trust and satisfaction to customers. The purpose of this study is to formulate the right decision in the context of selecting the best supplier for PT Aneka Jasa Grhadika, which has previously been one of their suppliers. The method applied is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision-making technique that generates priorities for alternatives when multiple criteria are considered. Therefore, in the decision-making process, decision-makers must transform complex problems into a unified hierarchy of several levels. The results showed that the quality criteria received a weight of 32.5%. The price criteria received a weight of 31.3%, the flexibility criteria received a weight of 15.3%, the delivery criteria received a weight of 10.6% and the service criteria received a weight of 10.3%. In this study, there are three supplier options that can be selected. The analysis results show that PT Timbul Persada has a weight of 39.3%, PT Nafaro Bumi Mandiri has a weight of 37.8%, while supplier PT Harang Bumi Energi has a weight of 22.9%.","PeriodicalId":17758,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Serambi Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Serambi Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v8i4.6828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PT Aneka Jasa Grhadika is a company that focuses on the Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) sector. They are highly committed to maintaining the quality of their products with the aim of providing trust and satisfaction to customers. To manufacture its products, the company adopts three main production systems, namely Make to Order (MTO), Assembly to Order (ATO), and Engineering to Order (ETO). They are very committed to maintaining the quality of their products with the aim of providing trust and satisfaction to customers. The purpose of this study is to formulate the right decision in the context of selecting the best supplier for PT Aneka Jasa Grhadika, which has previously been one of their suppliers. The method applied is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision-making technique that generates priorities for alternatives when multiple criteria are considered. Therefore, in the decision-making process, decision-makers must transform complex problems into a unified hierarchy of several levels. The results showed that the quality criteria received a weight of 32.5%. The price criteria received a weight of 31.3%, the flexibility criteria received a weight of 15.3%, the delivery criteria received a weight of 10.6% and the service criteria received a weight of 10.3%. In this study, there are three supplier options that can be selected. The analysis results show that PT Timbul Persada has a weight of 39.3%, PT Nafaro Bumi Mandiri has a weight of 37.8%, while supplier PT Harang Bumi Energi has a weight of 22.9%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用层次分析法分析石灰材料采购中的供应商选择(PT. Aneka Jasa Grhadika 案例研究)
PT Aneka Jasa Grhadika 是一家专注于工程设计、采购和施工(EPC)领域的公司。他们高度致力于保持产品质量,旨在为客户提供信任和满意的产品。为了生产产品,公司主要采用三种生产系统,即按订单生产(MTO)、按订单装配(ATO)和按订单工程设计(ETO)。他们非常重视保持产品质量,目的是让客户信任和满意。本研究的目的是为 PT Aneka Jasa Grhadika 公司选择最佳供应商(该公司曾是其供应商之一)制定正确的决策。所采用的方法是层次分析法(AHP),这是一种决策技术,可在考虑多个标准时生成备选方案的优先级。因此,在决策过程中,决策者必须将复杂的问题转化为由多个层次组成的统一层次结构。结果显示,质量标准的权重为 32.5%。价格标准的权重为 31.3%,灵活性标准的权重为 15.3%,交货标准的权重为 10.6%,服务标准的权重为 10.3%。在本研究中,有三个供应商备选方案可供选择。分析结果显示,PT Timbul Persada 的权重为 39.3%,PT Nafaro Bumi Mandiri 的权重为 37.8%,而供应商 PT Harang Bumi Energi 的权重为 22.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kajian Alokasi Global Carbon Budget kepada National Carbon Budget Indonesia Efektivitas Penambahan Limbah Kotoran Sapi Dalam Pengolahan Kompos Dari Limbah Daun Jati Menggunakan EM-4 Di Desa Tuksono Kecamatan Sentolo Kabupaten Kulonprogo Analisis Pengaruh Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Terhadap Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode Effect and Analysis pada 888 Plast Nematoda Gastrointestinal Pada Sapi Berdasarkan Ekologis Lingkungan Perhitungan Beban Emisi Particulate Matter berdasarkan Data CEMS dari PLTU Batu Bara Milik PT PLN (Persero)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1