Failing the test of historical integrity? Revisiting Gallipoli, the Armenian genocide and the First World War

Q3 Arts and Humanities History Australia Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1080/14490854.2023.2268655
D. Trudinger
{"title":"Failing the test of historical integrity? Revisiting Gallipoli, the Armenian genocide and the First World War","authors":"D. Trudinger","doi":"10.1080/14490854.2023.2268655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article revisits the question of the possible linkages between the Gallipoli campaign and the Armenian genocide, which began in Ottoman Turkey at about the same time. A case is made for the nexus, and a large international body of work is explored to assess the scholarly support for it. The article then examines some recent publications that threaten to undermine the nexus thesis and assesses their impact. It pays particular attention to research by Taner Akçam, an important student of the genocide and one of the first scholars to emphasise Gallipoli’s role in it. This research purports to shift the crucial extermination decisions by the Turkish authorities to earlier dates than previously thought, thus potentially reducing the likelihood of the Gallipoli landings being a factor in those decisions. The notion that the eight-month battle of Gallipoli played a part in maintaining, if not precipitating, the genocide is also briefly discussed. Finally, the article looks at a 2022 publication with an Australasian orientation, which promises to examine ‘the entangled relationship’ of Gallipoli and the Armenian genocide, and notes the curious and continuing reluctance of Australian historians to engage fully with this relationship.","PeriodicalId":35194,"journal":{"name":"History Australia","volume":"12 1","pages":"540 - 559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14490854.2023.2268655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article revisits the question of the possible linkages between the Gallipoli campaign and the Armenian genocide, which began in Ottoman Turkey at about the same time. A case is made for the nexus, and a large international body of work is explored to assess the scholarly support for it. The article then examines some recent publications that threaten to undermine the nexus thesis and assesses their impact. It pays particular attention to research by Taner Akçam, an important student of the genocide and one of the first scholars to emphasise Gallipoli’s role in it. This research purports to shift the crucial extermination decisions by the Turkish authorities to earlier dates than previously thought, thus potentially reducing the likelihood of the Gallipoli landings being a factor in those decisions. The notion that the eight-month battle of Gallipoli played a part in maintaining, if not precipitating, the genocide is also briefly discussed. Finally, the article looks at a 2022 publication with an Australasian orientation, which promises to examine ‘the entangled relationship’ of Gallipoli and the Armenian genocide, and notes the curious and continuing reluctance of Australian historians to engage fully with this relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未能通过历史完整性的检验?重新审视加利波利、亚美尼亚种族灭绝和第一次世界大战
摘要 本文重新探讨了加利波利战役与大约同时在奥斯曼土耳其开始的亚美尼亚种族灭绝之间可能存在的联系。文章论证了两者之间的联系,并探讨了大量国际研究成果,以评估学术界对此的支持。然后,文章探讨了最近发表的一些有可能破坏联系论的文章,并评估了它们的影响。文章特别关注了塔纳-阿克萨姆(Taner Akçam)的研究,他是研究种族灭绝的重要学者,也是最早强调加利波利在种族灭绝中的作用的学者之一。这项研究旨在将土耳其当局的关键性灭绝决定转移到比以前认为的更早的日期,从而有可能降低加利波利登陆成为这些决定中的一个因素的可能性。文章还简要讨论了为期八个月的加利波利战役在维持(如果不是促成)种族灭绝方面发挥作用的观点。最后,文章介绍了 2022 年出版的一本面向澳大利亚的刊物,该刊物承诺将研究加利波利与亚美尼亚种族灭绝之间的 "纠缠不清的关系",并指出澳大利亚历史学家一直不愿意充分参与这种关系的奇怪现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History Australia
History Australia Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: History Australia is the official journal of the Australian Historical Association. It publishes high quality and innovative scholarship in any field of history. Its goal is to reflect the breadth and vibrancy of the historical community in Australia and further afield.
期刊最新文献
‘White only to the depths of his outer skin’: newspapers, whiteness, and Indigenous Australian enlistment in the First World War A partial view: the limits and value of the legal archive for historicising domestic violence The threat posed by a woman inventor: law, labour and the subjugation of Louisa Lawson Archives, prisons and person-centred historical praxis: doing social history research on incarceration in colonial Africa Jared Davidson on New Zealand’s hidden convict history Blood and Dirt: Prison Labour and the Making of New Zealand , by Jared Davidson, Wellington, Bridget Williams Books, 2023, 304 pp., $AU45.77 (pbk), ISBN 9781991033406, Publisher’s website https://www.bwb.co.nz/
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1