COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY AND PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY FOLLOWING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY

Salah Saber Mabrouk, Essam El-Din Abd El-Azim El-Desouky, Abd El-Fattah Morsy Saeid
{"title":"COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY AND PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY FOLLOWING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY","authors":"Salah Saber Mabrouk, Essam El-Din Abd El-Azim El-Desouky, Abd El-Fattah Morsy Saeid","doi":"10.21608/amj.2023.326883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy are the two techniques for pancreatic anastomosis that are widely established for the reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Aim: To study the effect of the type of pancreaticoenteric reconstruction pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy (PJ versus PG) after pancreaticoduodenectomy regarding the post-operative mortality and morbidity particularly pancreatic fistula (PF). Patients and Methods: A prospective cohort study included 40 patients with pancreatic or periampullary cancer who undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. The patients divided randomizly into two groups; Group (A)included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction while group (B) included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction. Results: Mean operative time in group A and B was 7.6 ± 2.2 and 7.2 ± 2.7, mean blood loss 984.7 ± 253.2 and 852.5 ± 152.6, in most of the cases there was a Drains in contact with anastomosis was 85% and 70%, respectively. Also, there is no significant difference between both groups regarding intraoperative data. Considering postoperative complications, there was significant difference between both groups regarding","PeriodicalId":7627,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Medical Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2023.326883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy are the two techniques for pancreatic anastomosis that are widely established for the reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Aim: To study the effect of the type of pancreaticoenteric reconstruction pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy (PJ versus PG) after pancreaticoduodenectomy regarding the post-operative mortality and morbidity particularly pancreatic fistula (PF). Patients and Methods: A prospective cohort study included 40 patients with pancreatic or periampullary cancer who undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. The patients divided randomizly into two groups; Group (A)included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction while group (B) included 20 patients who had undergone pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction. Results: Mean operative time in group A and B was 7.6 ± 2.2 and 7.2 ± 2.7, mean blood loss 984.7 ± 253.2 and 852.5 ± 152.6, in most of the cases there was a Drains in contact with anastomosis was 85% and 70%, respectively. Also, there is no significant difference between both groups regarding intraoperative data. Considering postoperative complications, there was significant difference between both groups regarding
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰十二指肠切除术后胰空肠造口术与胰胃造口术的比较研究
背景:胰腺空肠吻合术和胰胃造口术是胰十二指肠切除术后重建胰腺的两种常用技术。目的:研究胰十二指肠切除术后胰腺空肠吻合术与胰胃造口术(PJ 与 PG)这两种胰肠重建方式对术后死亡率和发病率(尤其是胰瘘(PF))的影响。患者和方法:一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 40 名接受胰十二指肠切除术的胰腺癌或胰腺周围癌患者。患者随机分为两组:A 组包括 20 名接受胰空肠重建术的患者,B 组包括 20 名接受胰胃重建术的患者。结果A 组和 B 组的平均手术时间分别为(7.6 ± 2.2)和(7.2 ± 2.7),平均失血量分别为(984.7 ± 253.2)和(852.5 ± 152.6),大多数病例中与吻合口接触的引流管比例分别为 85% 和 70%。此外,两组患者的术中数据也无明显差异。至于术后并发症,两组在以下方面存在显著差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHIC CHANGES AFTER PTERYGIUM EXCISION WITH CONJUNCTIVAL AUTOGRAFT VERSUS INTRAOPERATIVE APPLICATION OF TOPICAL MITOMYCIN C PENTRAXIN 3 AND ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PATIENTS UNDER HAEMODIALYSIS AND RENAL REPLACEMENT TREATMENT SIGNIFICANCE OF ST-SEGMENT DEVIATION IN STANDARD ECG FOR PREDICTION OF CULPRIT ARTERY IN ACUTE INFERIOR WALL ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EARLY PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF LEVOSIMENDAN VERSUS INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP IN LOW CARDIAC FUNCTION PATIENTS UNDERGOING OFF PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY BILIARY COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING LIVER RESECTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1