How collections and reputation were built out of Tasmanian violence: thylacines (Thylacinus cynocephalus) and Aboriginal remains from Morton Allport (1830–1878)

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Archives of Natural History Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3366/anh.2023.0859
Jack Ashby
{"title":"How collections and reputation were built out of Tasmanian violence: thylacines (Thylacinus cynocephalus) and Aboriginal remains from Morton Allport (1830–1878)","authors":"Jack Ashby","doi":"10.3366/anh.2023.0859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through European colonization, First Nations peoples were subjected to systematic and violent actions to dispossess them of their land and sovereignty. In Tasmania, this involved government-sponsored bounties as well as militaristic and diplomatic efforts to remove Indigenous peoples from the landscape. At the same time, and using similar rhetoric, thylacines ( Thylacinus cynocephalus (Harris, 1808)) suffered similarly from settler colonists. Thylacines (also known as Tasmanian tigers or Tasmanian wolves) were the largest marsupial carnivores of modern times, but became extinct in the twentieth century. There are several parallels between the treatment and representation of thylacines and Indigenous Tasmanian people, and how their remains were traded. This allows for analysis of how the environmental and human costs of the colonial project were enmeshed with practices of natural history. A central figure in the export of both thylacines and Indigenous remains from Tasmania was Morton Allport (1830–1878). This paper shows that Allport actively built his scientific reputation by exchanging specimens for honours. It asks whether this was a widespread model for other colonial figures who may have used specimen-based philanthropy to develop a form of soft power through associations with respected institutions such as learned societies, universities and museums. Figures like Allport played the role of a type of colonial settler-intermediary, valued for providing privileged access to specimens to the metropole. Allport also worked to augment scientific work in Tasmania and the economic reputation of the colony, demonstrating that the development of social networks and scientific reputations of colonial figures were entwined with the status and success of the colonies themselves.","PeriodicalId":49106,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Natural History","volume":"300 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Natural History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/anh.2023.0859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through European colonization, First Nations peoples were subjected to systematic and violent actions to dispossess them of their land and sovereignty. In Tasmania, this involved government-sponsored bounties as well as militaristic and diplomatic efforts to remove Indigenous peoples from the landscape. At the same time, and using similar rhetoric, thylacines ( Thylacinus cynocephalus (Harris, 1808)) suffered similarly from settler colonists. Thylacines (also known as Tasmanian tigers or Tasmanian wolves) were the largest marsupial carnivores of modern times, but became extinct in the twentieth century. There are several parallels between the treatment and representation of thylacines and Indigenous Tasmanian people, and how their remains were traded. This allows for analysis of how the environmental and human costs of the colonial project were enmeshed with practices of natural history. A central figure in the export of both thylacines and Indigenous remains from Tasmania was Morton Allport (1830–1878). This paper shows that Allport actively built his scientific reputation by exchanging specimens for honours. It asks whether this was a widespread model for other colonial figures who may have used specimen-based philanthropy to develop a form of soft power through associations with respected institutions such as learned societies, universities and museums. Figures like Allport played the role of a type of colonial settler-intermediary, valued for providing privileged access to specimens to the metropole. Allport also worked to augment scientific work in Tasmania and the economic reputation of the colony, demonstrating that the development of social networks and scientific reputations of colonial figures were entwined with the status and success of the colonies themselves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何从塔斯马尼亚暴力中建立起收藏和声誉:莫顿-奥尔波特(Morton Allport,1830-1878 年)的袋狼(Thylacinus cynocephalus)和原住民遗骸
通过欧洲殖民化,原住民遭受了有计划的暴力行动,以剥夺他们的土地和主权。在塔斯马尼亚,这包括政府资助的赏金以及军事和外交努力,目的是将原住民从这片土地上赶走。与此同时,塔斯马尼亚犬(Thylacinus cynocephalus (Harris, 1808))也受到了殖民者类似的攻击。塔斯马尼亚犬(又称塔斯马尼亚虎或塔斯马尼亚狼)是现代最大的有袋类食肉动物,但在 20 世纪灭绝。塔斯马尼亚原住民对待袋狼和表现袋狼的方式,以及袋狼遗骸的交易方式有几处相似之处。这有助于分析殖民项目的环境和人类代价是如何与自然历史的实践联系在一起的。莫顿-奥尔波特(Morton Allport,1830-1878 年)是出口塔斯马尼亚袋狼和土著遗骸的核心人物。本文介绍了艾尔波特通过用标本换取荣誉来积极建立自己的科学声誉。本文探讨了这是否是其他殖民地人物的普遍模式,他们可能利用标本慈善事业,通过与学术团体、大学和博物馆等受人尊敬的机构建立联系,发展一种软实力。像奥尔波特这样的人物扮演了一种殖民定居者-中介人的角色,他们为大都市提供了获得标本的特权,因而受到重视。奥尔波特还致力于提高塔斯马尼亚的科学工作和殖民地的经济声誉,这表明殖民地人物的社会网络和科学声誉的发展与殖民地本身的地位和成功息息相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Natural History
Archives of Natural History HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Natural History (formerly the Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History) publishes peer-reviewed papers on the history and bibliography of natural history in its broadest sense, and in all periods and all cultures. This is taken to include botany, general biology, geology, palaeontology and zoology, the lives of naturalists, their publications, correspondence and collections, and the institutions and societies to which they belong. Bibliographical papers concerned with the study of rare books, manuscripts and illustrative material, and analytical and enumerative bibliographies are also published.
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of patients presenting with appendicitis to the emergency department. The ornithology of Agnes Block (1629–1704): Dutch naturalist, artist, collector and patron BORAN, Elizabethanne, NELSON, E. Charles and LAWLOR, Emer (editors). Botany and gardens in early modern Ireland History of the crested turkey, a rare variant of the domesticated turkey (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) GOSS, Andrew (editor). The Routledge handbook of science and empire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1