Immediate Implant Placement with Flap or Flapless Surgery

Esam Eshaweirf, Abdesalam Sougei
{"title":"Immediate Implant Placement with Flap or Flapless Surgery","authors":"Esam Eshaweirf, Abdesalam Sougei","doi":"10.21608/ijma.2023.230752.1786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article information Background: The practice of immediately placing dental implants has grown widespread in the field of oral implantology, and there is ongoing discussion on the optimal surgical technique, namely whether to use a flap or flapless approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the results of these two procedures in relation to gum health, bleeding during probing, soft tissue thickness, implant durability, bone loss, and bone density. The Aim of the work: We aim to examine and contrast the results of instantaneous implant implantation operations using two distinct surgical methods: flap surgery and flapless surgery. Patients and Methods: A total of forty patients who were scheduled for implant surgery at the Maxillofacial Department Surgery were assigned to two distinct groups: Group I, which underwent flapless surgery, and Group II, which underwent flap surgery. The study evaluated various parameters including the gum health index, bleeding during probing, soft tissue thickness around and on top of the implants, implant stability, bone loss, and bone density. These assessments were conducted at the start of the trial and again after a 6-month follow-up. Results: There were no notable disparities in the average gum health index and bleeding during probing between the two groups at the start and after 6 months. There were no notable variations in the thickness of the soft tissue surrounding the teeth on the sides. Nevertheless, the thickness of the soft tissue covering the teeth was notably reduced in the group that underwent flap surgery. The implant stability was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Flapless surgery exhibited similar results to flap surgery in terms of gum health, bleeding during probing, soft tissue thickness, and implant stability. Nevertheless, it shown benefits in preserving the thickness of the soft tissue above the teeth and preventing excessive bone loss and decreased bone","PeriodicalId":53130,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2023.230752.1786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article information Background: The practice of immediately placing dental implants has grown widespread in the field of oral implantology, and there is ongoing discussion on the optimal surgical technique, namely whether to use a flap or flapless approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the results of these two procedures in relation to gum health, bleeding during probing, soft tissue thickness, implant durability, bone loss, and bone density. The Aim of the work: We aim to examine and contrast the results of instantaneous implant implantation operations using two distinct surgical methods: flap surgery and flapless surgery. Patients and Methods: A total of forty patients who were scheduled for implant surgery at the Maxillofacial Department Surgery were assigned to two distinct groups: Group I, which underwent flapless surgery, and Group II, which underwent flap surgery. The study evaluated various parameters including the gum health index, bleeding during probing, soft tissue thickness around and on top of the implants, implant stability, bone loss, and bone density. These assessments were conducted at the start of the trial and again after a 6-month follow-up. Results: There were no notable disparities in the average gum health index and bleeding during probing between the two groups at the start and after 6 months. There were no notable variations in the thickness of the soft tissue surrounding the teeth on the sides. Nevertheless, the thickness of the soft tissue covering the teeth was notably reduced in the group that underwent flap surgery. The implant stability was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Flapless surgery exhibited similar results to flap surgery in terms of gum health, bleeding during probing, soft tissue thickness, and implant stability. Nevertheless, it shown benefits in preserving the thickness of the soft tissue above the teeth and preventing excessive bone loss and decreased bone
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻瓣或无瓣手术即刻植入种植体
文章信息 背景:在口腔种植学领域,即刻植入种植体的做法越来越普遍,关于最佳手术技术,即使用翻瓣法还是无瓣法的讨论也一直在进行。本研究的目的是评估和比较这两种手术在牙龈健康、探查时出血、软组织厚度、种植体耐久性、骨质流失和骨密度等方面的效果。工作目标:我们旨在研究和对比使用两种不同手术方法:翻瓣手术和无瓣手术进行即刻种植手术的结果。患者和方法:我们将颌面外科计划进行种植手术的四十名患者分为两组:第一组接受无瓣手术,第二组接受翻瓣手术。研究评估了各种参数,包括牙龈健康指数、探查时的出血量、种植体周围和顶部的软组织厚度、种植体稳定性、骨质流失和骨密度。这些评估在试验开始时进行,并在 6 个月的随访后再次进行。结果:试验开始时和 6 个月后,两组患者的平均牙龈健康指数和探诊出血量没有明显差异。两侧牙齿周围软组织的厚度也没有明显差异。不过,接受翻瓣手术的一组牙齿周围软组织的厚度明显减少。两组的种植体稳定性相似。结论在牙龈健康、探诊出血、软组织厚度和种植体稳定性方面,无瓣手术与翻瓣手术的结果相似。不过,无瓣手术在保留牙齿上方软组织厚度、防止骨质过度流失和骨质减少方面表现出优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unilateral Stereotactic Radiofrequency Thalamotomy for Tremors in Parkinson’s Patients Study of Early versus Delayed Oral Fluid and Food after Cesarean Section Comparative Study Between the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Mini Gastric Bypass for Morbidly Obese Patients Effect of Resistance Training on Physical Performance in Underweight Females Efficacy of Topical Latanoprost Versus Topical Minoxidil In the Treatment of Alopecia Areata: Clinical and Dermoscopic Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1