Effects of Social Support and Self-regulation on Changes in Exercise Behavior Among Infertile Women: A Cross-sectional Study for Comparison of External and Internal Factors

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Education and Community Health Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.34172/jech.2291
A. Fallahi, A. Rahmani, Pakestan Hamad Amin Yousif, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh, L. Allahqoli, Babak Nemat, Ibrahim Alkatout
{"title":"Effects of Social Support and Self-regulation on Changes in Exercise Behavior Among Infertile Women: A Cross-sectional Study for Comparison of External and Internal Factors","authors":"A. Fallahi, A. Rahmani, Pakestan Hamad Amin Yousif, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh, L. Allahqoli, Babak Nemat, Ibrahim Alkatout","doi":"10.34172/jech.2291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exercise behavior (EB) has a significant impact on infertility, but the magnitude of the effect is not easily determined. This study aimed to assess the effect of social support and self-regulation, as external and internal factors, on changes in EB among infertile women. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 483 infertile women in Sanandaj (Iran) in 2020. Samples were recruited from 35 comprehensive healthcare centers by convenience sampling. Standardized face-to-face interviews were conducted using valid and reliable instruments for the assessment of EB, social support, and self-regulation. The association between EB, social support, and self-regulation was evaluated by logistic regression models. Results: The majority of the participants (56.7%) had secondary infertility, while 70.8% of them did not perform any exercise. Self-regulation and social support were significantly higher in women with secondary infertility than in those with primary infertility (P<0.01). Self-regulation was significantly lower in women whose height was below 160 centimeters (P<0.05). Social support was significantly higher among participants aged≥35 years and weighing≥60 kg (P<0.01). The odds of EB adoption increased with self-regulation and social support (odds ratio [OR]=1.05, 95% CI=1.02-1.09, P<0.01; OR=1.06, 95% CI=1.02-1.11, P<0.01). Conclusion: Social support and self-regulation almost equally influenced EB in infertile women. In future research, designing support and consultation programs can be considered to encourage infertile women to exercise.","PeriodicalId":36491,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jech.2291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise behavior (EB) has a significant impact on infertility, but the magnitude of the effect is not easily determined. This study aimed to assess the effect of social support and self-regulation, as external and internal factors, on changes in EB among infertile women. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 483 infertile women in Sanandaj (Iran) in 2020. Samples were recruited from 35 comprehensive healthcare centers by convenience sampling. Standardized face-to-face interviews were conducted using valid and reliable instruments for the assessment of EB, social support, and self-regulation. The association between EB, social support, and self-regulation was evaluated by logistic regression models. Results: The majority of the participants (56.7%) had secondary infertility, while 70.8% of them did not perform any exercise. Self-regulation and social support were significantly higher in women with secondary infertility than in those with primary infertility (P<0.01). Self-regulation was significantly lower in women whose height was below 160 centimeters (P<0.05). Social support was significantly higher among participants aged≥35 years and weighing≥60 kg (P<0.01). The odds of EB adoption increased with self-regulation and social support (odds ratio [OR]=1.05, 95% CI=1.02-1.09, P<0.01; OR=1.06, 95% CI=1.02-1.11, P<0.01). Conclusion: Social support and self-regulation almost equally influenced EB in infertile women. In future research, designing support and consultation programs can be considered to encourage infertile women to exercise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会支持和自我调节对不孕妇女运动行为变化的影响:比较外部和内部因素的横断面研究
背景:运动行为(EB)对不孕症有重大影响,但其影响程度不易确定。本研究旨在评估社会支持和自我调节作为外部和内部因素对不孕妇女运动行为变化的影响。研究方法这项横断面研究于 2020 年在伊朗萨南达季对 483 名不孕妇女进行了调查。样本从 35 个综合医疗保健中心以便利抽样的方式招募。使用有效可靠的工具对 EB、社会支持和自我调节进行了标准化的面对面访谈。通过逻辑回归模型评估了 EB、社会支持和自我调节之间的关联。结果显示大多数参与者(56.7%)患有继发性不孕症,70.8%的参与者没有进行任何锻炼。继发性不孕妇女的自我调节能力和社会支持明显高于原发性不孕妇女(P<0.01)。身高低于 160 厘米的妇女的自我调节能力明显较低(P<0.05)。年龄≥35 岁、体重≥60 千克的参与者获得的社会支持明显更高(P<0.01)。采用 EB 的几率随着自我调节和社会支持的增加而增加(几率比 [OR]=1.05, 95% CI=1.02-1.09, P<0.01;OR=1.06, 95% CI=1.02-1.11, P<0.01)。结论社会支持和自我调节对不孕妇女EB的影响几乎相同。在未来的研究中,可以考虑设计支持和咨询计划来鼓励不孕妇女进行锻炼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education and Community Health
Journal of Education and Community Health Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Social Support Theory as a Predictor of Sleep Hygiene Behaviors Among Older Adults Preventive Behaviors of Iranian Women Toward Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Perspective of Motivation Protection Theory Factors Influencing Substance Use Relapse in People Referring to Addiction Recovery Centers in Jiroft, Kerman Investigating the Effect of Tailored Educational Program Based on Protection Motivation Theory on Mammography Adherence in Iranian Women Subjective Well-Being and Its Relationship With Personality Traits, Irrational Beliefs, and Social Support: A Model Test
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1