Internal expert conviction: forensic veterinary aspect

Ivan Yatsenko
{"title":"Internal expert conviction: forensic veterinary aspect","authors":"Ivan Yatsenko","doi":"10.32353/khrife.3.2023.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using general scientific and special scientific methods, problematic aspects of internal conviction phenomenon of forensic expert (in particular, forensic veterinarian) are outlined and ways of their solution are proposed. It has been proven that this category is an element of independence and immediacy of research on object specifics and properties in order to find out factual data and case (proceedings) circumstances. The author’s definition of concept of “internal conviction of forensic expert” is formulated, its specifics and factors affecting its formation are singled out. Mechanism for minimizing influence of subjectivism on forensic expert activity and on drawing up forensic expert conclusion is proposed. Structure of expert’s inner conviction is revealed and attention is focused on the fact that it is expedient to distinguish epistemological, psychological, ethical, moral and legal components. Directions of implementation of this phenomenon in forensic expert activity are considered. It is argued that internal conviction of forensic expert should be understood as the state of his consciousness and feelings which is the result of mental subjective activity while conducting expert research and evaluating the signs and properties of tangible and materialized objects in order to find out the factual data and circumstances of case (proceedings) according to a specific examination, when he considers the condition of objects provided for research to be suitable, and their number sufficient to provide a well-founded and objective conclusion; is sure of its correctness, does not doubt infallibility of his decision and is ready to act in accordance with.","PeriodicalId":340932,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.3.2023.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using general scientific and special scientific methods, problematic aspects of internal conviction phenomenon of forensic expert (in particular, forensic veterinarian) are outlined and ways of their solution are proposed. It has been proven that this category is an element of independence and immediacy of research on object specifics and properties in order to find out factual data and case (proceedings) circumstances. The author’s definition of concept of “internal conviction of forensic expert” is formulated, its specifics and factors affecting its formation are singled out. Mechanism for minimizing influence of subjectivism on forensic expert activity and on drawing up forensic expert conclusion is proposed. Structure of expert’s inner conviction is revealed and attention is focused on the fact that it is expedient to distinguish epistemological, psychological, ethical, moral and legal components. Directions of implementation of this phenomenon in forensic expert activity are considered. It is argued that internal conviction of forensic expert should be understood as the state of his consciousness and feelings which is the result of mental subjective activity while conducting expert research and evaluating the signs and properties of tangible and materialized objects in order to find out the factual data and circumstances of case (proceedings) according to a specific examination, when he considers the condition of objects provided for research to be suitable, and their number sufficient to provide a well-founded and objective conclusion; is sure of its correctness, does not doubt infallibility of his decision and is ready to act in accordance with.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部专家定罪:法医兽医方面
利用一般科学和特殊科学方法,概述了法医专家(特别是法医兽医)内部定罪现象的问题方面,并提出了解决方法。事实证明,为了找出事实数据和案件(诉讼)情况,对研究对象的具体情况和属性进行研究时,这一类别是独立和直接的要素。作者提出了 "法医专家内部信念 "概念的定义,并指出了其具体内容和影响其形成的因素。提出了尽量减少主观主义对法医专家活动和法医专家结论的影响的机制。揭示了法医专家内心信念的结构,并着重指出应区分认识论、心理学、伦理、道德和法律等方面的内容。考虑了在法医专家活动中实施这一现象的方向。本文认为,法医专家的内心信念应被理解为:当他认为所提供的研究对象条件合适,其数量足以提供有充分依据的客观结论;确信其正确性,不怀疑其决定的无误性,并准备按照该结论行事时,他在进行专家研究和评估有形和物化对象的迹象和属性时的主观心理活动所产生的意识和情感状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
100 Years of Experience in Forensic Science Support to Justice Possibilities of Diagnostic Research on Speech of People State of Alcohol Intoxication Problematic Aspects of Appointing and Conducting a Forensic Fire Investigation Legal regulation of innovation and investment activities in agrarian sector of Ukrainian economy Introduction Directions of Foreign Innovative Practice in Staffing of Forensic Science Institutions of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1