Evaluation of Patient’s Pain Assessment Format for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study

Nishant Gaurav, S. Gautam, Anil Agarwal, S. Dhiraaj
{"title":"Evaluation of Patient’s Pain Assessment Format for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study","authors":"Nishant Gaurav, S. Gautam, Anil Agarwal, S. Dhiraaj","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_94_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of pain management depends on appropriate pain assessment. Postoperative pain assessment is done by acute pain service (APS) team; patients may also assess their pain scores with the help of a patient’s pain assessment format. The present study has evaluated the efficacy of patient’s pain assessment format by comparing it with pain assessment done by the APS team. Thirty-five patients undergoing abdominal surgery were enrolled in this study; postoperative pain assessment was done by patient’s pain assessment format and APS team for a period of 3 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain score and the secondary outcome measures were postoperative nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, pruritus, numbness, paresthesia, or weakness in the legs. Results were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U-test and Fisher’s exact test. P <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Pain scores and incidence of side effects assessed by the patient’s pain assessment format were comparable to those assessed by the APS team; however, the first reading of pain scores after surgery assessed by the patient’s pain assessment format was significantly higher than that assessed by the APS team (P < 0.05). Pain scores assessed by the patient’s pain assessment format were comparable to the pain scores assessed by the APS team. Hence, we recommend the use of patient’s pain assessment format as a valid tool for the assessment of postoperative pain by the APS team.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_94_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficiency of pain management depends on appropriate pain assessment. Postoperative pain assessment is done by acute pain service (APS) team; patients may also assess their pain scores with the help of a patient’s pain assessment format. The present study has evaluated the efficacy of patient’s pain assessment format by comparing it with pain assessment done by the APS team. Thirty-five patients undergoing abdominal surgery were enrolled in this study; postoperative pain assessment was done by patient’s pain assessment format and APS team for a period of 3 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain score and the secondary outcome measures were postoperative nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, pruritus, numbness, paresthesia, or weakness in the legs. Results were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U-test and Fisher’s exact test. P <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Pain scores and incidence of side effects assessed by the patient’s pain assessment format were comparable to those assessed by the APS team; however, the first reading of pain scores after surgery assessed by the patient’s pain assessment format was significantly higher than that assessed by the APS team (P < 0.05). Pain scores assessed by the patient’s pain assessment format were comparable to the pain scores assessed by the APS team. Hence, we recommend the use of patient’s pain assessment format as a valid tool for the assessment of postoperative pain by the APS team.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估腹部手术患者术后疼痛的患者疼痛评估格式:前瞻性观察研究
疼痛管理的效率取决于适当的疼痛评估。术后疼痛评估由急性疼痛服务团队(APS)完成;患者也可借助患者疼痛评估格式来评估自己的疼痛评分。本研究通过将患者疼痛评估格式与急性疼痛服务小组进行的疼痛评估进行比较,评估了患者疼痛评估格式的有效性。 35 名接受腹部手术的患者被纳入本研究;术后 3 天内,患者疼痛评估格式和 APS 小组对患者进行了术后疼痛评估。主要结果指标为术后疼痛评分,次要结果指标为术后恶心呕吐、腹胀、瘙痒、麻木、麻痹或腿部无力。结果采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验和费雪精确检验进行分析。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 患者疼痛评估格式评估的疼痛评分和副作用发生率与 APS 小组评估的评分和副作用发生率相当;但是,患者疼痛评估格式评估的术后首次疼痛评分明显高于 APS 小组评估的评分(P < 0.05)。 患者疼痛评估格式得出的疼痛评分与 APS 小组得出的疼痛评分相当。因此,我们建议使用患者疼痛评估格式作为 APS 小组评估术后疼痛的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous Adductor Canal Block versus Single-shot Adductor Canal Block Using Ropivacaine for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodistention with Corticosteroid Instillation in Glenohumeral Joint for Relief in Frozen Shoulder: A Case Series Hypervitaminosis D Due to Overdose: A Case Series A Comparative Study of Ultrasound Guided erector Spinae Plane Block versus Local Anaesthetic Infiltration in Spine Surgeries for Intraoperative and Post-operative Analgesia Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Postdural Puncture Headache: A Less Trodden Path
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1