Diagnostic Accuracy Of Acromioaxillosuprasternal Notch Index For Prediction Of Difficult Airway Taking Cormack And Lehane Grading System As Gold Standard

Muhammad Mohsin Sajjad, Amina Tariq, Muhammad Shabbir, Sidra Yousaf
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy Of Acromioaxillosuprasternal Notch Index For Prediction Of Difficult Airway Taking Cormack And Lehane Grading System As Gold Standard","authors":"Muhammad Mohsin Sajjad, Amina Tariq, Muhammad Shabbir, Sidra Yousaf","doi":"10.37939/jrmc.v27i3.2269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: General anesthesia is still needed for several surgical interventions and requires endotracheal intubation. The difficult airway is a well-known entity, and a long list of predicting scores is present, yet a high degree of diagnostic accuracy still needs to be improved. Acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (AASI) has shown some excellent results in recent times. Objective: Its objective is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index for predicting difficult airways and to take the Cormack and Lehane grading system as the gold standard. Methodology:   In this study, adults of both genders aged 20 to 70 years undergoing any surgery under general anesthesia having ASA class I to IV were included. AASI score of equal or less than 0.49 was taken as difficult airway while on Cormack and Lehane grade; it was labeled as yes where grade III or IV was seen. Results: The total number of cases were 350 cases, out of which 218 (62.29%) were males, and 132 (37.71%) were females. The mean age was 40.20±12.86 years, and the mean BMI was 24.71±3.13 (table 17). There were 294 (84%) cases in ASA Class I and II and 56 (14%) in class III and IV. Difficult intubation on AASI was seen in 54 (15.43%) and 57 (16.29%) cases on Cormack and Lehane grading.  The diagnostic accuracy of AASI for prediction of difficult intubating a difficult was 96.29% with sensitivity of 90.74%, specificity of 97.30%, PPV of 85.96%, NPV of 98.29% with p= 0.001. This difference was also statistically significant with all the confounding variables like age, gender, ASA class, and BMI.  Conclusion: The acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index is a significant predictor for tubing a difficult airway and taking Cormack and Lehane's grading as the gold standard. This difference is considerably better regarding age, gender, BMI, and ASA class.","PeriodicalId":34174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v27i3.2269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General anesthesia is still needed for several surgical interventions and requires endotracheal intubation. The difficult airway is a well-known entity, and a long list of predicting scores is present, yet a high degree of diagnostic accuracy still needs to be improved. Acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (AASI) has shown some excellent results in recent times. Objective: Its objective is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index for predicting difficult airways and to take the Cormack and Lehane grading system as the gold standard. Methodology:   In this study, adults of both genders aged 20 to 70 years undergoing any surgery under general anesthesia having ASA class I to IV were included. AASI score of equal or less than 0.49 was taken as difficult airway while on Cormack and Lehane grade; it was labeled as yes where grade III or IV was seen. Results: The total number of cases were 350 cases, out of which 218 (62.29%) were males, and 132 (37.71%) were females. The mean age was 40.20±12.86 years, and the mean BMI was 24.71±3.13 (table 17). There were 294 (84%) cases in ASA Class I and II and 56 (14%) in class III and IV. Difficult intubation on AASI was seen in 54 (15.43%) and 57 (16.29%) cases on Cormack and Lehane grading.  The diagnostic accuracy of AASI for prediction of difficult intubating a difficult was 96.29% with sensitivity of 90.74%, specificity of 97.30%, PPV of 85.96%, NPV of 98.29% with p= 0.001. This difference was also statistically significant with all the confounding variables like age, gender, ASA class, and BMI.  Conclusion: The acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index is a significant predictor for tubing a difficult airway and taking Cormack and Lehane's grading as the gold standard. This difference is considerably better regarding age, gender, BMI, and ASA class.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级系统为金标准,胸骨上切迹指数在预测困难气道方面的诊断准确性
背景: 一些外科手术仍然需要全身麻醉,并且需要气管插管。困难气道是一个众所周知的问题,目前已有一长串预测评分,但诊断准确性仍有待提高。近来,腋上胸骨切迹指数(AASI)取得了一些卓越的成果。 目标: 其目的是确定肩峰胸骨切迹指数预测困难气道的诊断准确性,并将 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级系统作为金标准。 研究方法: 研究对象包括 20 至 70 岁、在全身麻醉下接受任何手术且 ASA 分级为 I 至 IV 级的男女成人。AASI 评分等于或小于 0.49 为困难气道,而在 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级中,如果出现 III 级或 IV 级,则标记为 "是"。 结果: 病例总数为 350 例,其中男性 218 例(62.29%),女性 132 例(37.71%)。平均年龄为(40.20±12.86)岁,平均体重指数为(24.71±3.13)(表 17)。ASA I 级和 II 级病例 294 例(84%),III 级和 IV 级病例 56 例(14%)。54 例(15.43%)和 57 例(16.29%)根据 AASI 和 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级出现插管困难。 AASI 预测困难插管的诊断准确率为 96.29%,敏感性为 90.74%,特异性为 97.30%,PPV 为 85.96%,NPV 为 98.29%,P= 0.001。与年龄、性别、ASA 分级和体重指数等所有混杂变量相比,这一差异也具有统计学意义。 结论 以 Cormack 和 Lehane 的分级作为金标准,尖峰胸骨上切迹指数是预测困难气道的重要指标。这种差异在年龄、性别、体重指数和 ASA 分级方面要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hepatitus C Guidelines Hepatitus C Guidelines Association Of Raised Serum Triglycerides With Incidence Of Pre-Eclampsia Association Of Electroencephalogram Patterns With Ammonia Levels In Hepatic Encephalopathy Patients Case Report Of A Giant Plunging Ranula In A 25-Year-Old Patient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1