COVID-19 Vaccine Practices and Perceptions Among an Academic Healthcare Community

Samiksha Prasad, W. Wahood, Darisel Ventura Rodriguez, Amanda J. Chase
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Practices and Perceptions Among an Academic Healthcare Community","authors":"Samiksha Prasad, W. Wahood, Darisel Ventura Rodriguez, Amanda J. Chase","doi":"10.2174/0126667975259369230921054259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The COVID-19 pandemic served as a driving force for the evaluation of nextgeneration vaccine technology platforms through novel paradigms to accelerate vaccine development and administration. However, vaccine acceptance is influenced by many factors, including social influences and community-based interventions. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination climate on an academic health professions community of students, faculty, and staff. An anonymous, 29-item survey was developed with questions pertaining to demographics, COVID-19 infection, vaccine practices and hesitancy. A total of 583 students, faculty, and staff from multiple health professions at a single academic institution completed the survey. A higher number of students agreed that they “feel socially pressured to get the COVID-19 vaccine” as compared to faculty/staff (39.3% vs. 18.2%, p<0.001). In addition, a lower number of students agreed that “the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks” compared to faculty/staff (85.9% vs. 92.8%, p=0.039). Moreover, a lower number of students disagreed with the statement “healthcare workers/students should have the right to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine that is required by their employer/ institution” compared to faculty/staff (40.2% vs. 68.9%, p<0.001). These were among 11 of the statistically divergent responses that gaged vaccine hesitancy. This study provides insight into the perceptions of vaccines from students, faculty, and staff within an interprofessional healthcare community and highlights the need for vaccine education early in health professions curricula.","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975259369230921054259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The COVID-19 pandemic served as a driving force for the evaluation of nextgeneration vaccine technology platforms through novel paradigms to accelerate vaccine development and administration. However, vaccine acceptance is influenced by many factors, including social influences and community-based interventions. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination climate on an academic health professions community of students, faculty, and staff. An anonymous, 29-item survey was developed with questions pertaining to demographics, COVID-19 infection, vaccine practices and hesitancy. A total of 583 students, faculty, and staff from multiple health professions at a single academic institution completed the survey. A higher number of students agreed that they “feel socially pressured to get the COVID-19 vaccine” as compared to faculty/staff (39.3% vs. 18.2%, p<0.001). In addition, a lower number of students agreed that “the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks” compared to faculty/staff (85.9% vs. 92.8%, p=0.039). Moreover, a lower number of students disagreed with the statement “healthcare workers/students should have the right to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine that is required by their employer/ institution” compared to faculty/staff (40.2% vs. 68.9%, p<0.001). These were among 11 of the statistically divergent responses that gaged vaccine hesitancy. This study provides insight into the perceptions of vaccines from students, faculty, and staff within an interprofessional healthcare community and highlights the need for vaccine education early in health professions curricula.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 疫苗接种实践与学术界的看法
冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是由 SARS-CoV-2 病毒引起的一种传染病。COVID-19 大流行推动了通过新模式评估下一代疫苗技术平台,以加快疫苗的开发和管理。然而,疫苗的接受程度受到很多因素的影响,包括社会影响和社区干预。 本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行和疫苗接种氛围对一个由学生、教职员工组成的健康专业学术社区的影响。 研究人员编制了一份包含 29 个项目的匿名调查问卷,其中的问题涉及人口统计学、COVID-19 感染、疫苗接种实践和犹豫不决。来自一所学术机构多个卫生专业的 583 名学生、教职员工完成了调查。 与教职员工相比,有更多的学生同意他们 "感到有接种 COVID-19 疫苗的社会压力"(39.3% 对 18.2%,P<0.001)。此外,与教职员工相比,同意 "接种疫苗的益处大于风险 "的学生人数较少(85.9% 对 92.8%,P=0.039)。此外,与教职员工相比,不同意 "医护人员/学生应有权拒绝接种雇主/机构要求的 COVID-19 疫苗 "这一说法的学生人数较少(40.2% vs. 68.9%,p<0.001)。以上是对疫苗接种犹豫不决的 11 种不同统计结果的回答。 这项研究深入探讨了跨专业医疗保健社区的学生、教职员工对疫苗的看法,并强调了在医疗专业课程中尽早开展疫苗教育的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness on the Severity of Disease: A Case-control Study in Southeastern Iran Evaluation of Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Analysis of Motivating and Hindering Factors Novel Coronavirus: An Overview of the History, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of the Pandemic COVID-19 Catastrophe, with Special Emphasis on Herbal Treatment Alternatives Spectrum of Long COVID Symptoms and Management Approaches in Europe and Latin America Identification of Epitope Against Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2: In Silico Vaccine Design Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1