Is There Cross-Cycle Adjustment in China’s Monetary Policy?

Minghua Zhan, Yao Lu
{"title":"Is There Cross-Cycle Adjustment in China’s Monetary Policy?","authors":"Minghua Zhan, Yao Lu","doi":"10.1515/cfer-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To settle the theoretical and practical disputes over monetary policy cross-cycle adjustment, this paper explores the possible effects of China’s monetary policy cross-cycle adjustment based on empirical data. By using China’s macroeconomic data between the first quarter of 2000 and the fourth quarter of 2021, we use the HP filtering method to measure the trend of economic cyclical volatility, the three-stage SETAR model and the trend mutation point identification method to identify two types of cycles, respectively, and the FAVAR model to make empirical judgments on the effectiveness of monetary policy cross-cycle adjustment. We have the following research findings. First, monetary policy has certain cross-cycle adjustment effects on aggregate output, but has quite strong state dependence. Second, monetary policy has no cross-cycle adjustment effects on industrial output. Third, the higher the economic uncertainties, the worse the monetary policy cross-cycle adjustment effects, which, however, can be increased by intensifying monetary policy regulation. Fourth, in the economic recession stage, quantity-based monetary policy has advantage over price-based monetary policy in cross-cycle adjustments, while both of the above policies have no cross-cycle adjustment in the economic growth stage. Fifth, policy expectation plays an important role in cross-cycle adjustment, and reinforcing expectations is the key to realizing cross-cycle adjustment.","PeriodicalId":505490,"journal":{"name":"China Finance and Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance and Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract To settle the theoretical and practical disputes over monetary policy cross-cycle adjustment, this paper explores the possible effects of China’s monetary policy cross-cycle adjustment based on empirical data. By using China’s macroeconomic data between the first quarter of 2000 and the fourth quarter of 2021, we use the HP filtering method to measure the trend of economic cyclical volatility, the three-stage SETAR model and the trend mutation point identification method to identify two types of cycles, respectively, and the FAVAR model to make empirical judgments on the effectiveness of monetary policy cross-cycle adjustment. We have the following research findings. First, monetary policy has certain cross-cycle adjustment effects on aggregate output, but has quite strong state dependence. Second, monetary policy has no cross-cycle adjustment effects on industrial output. Third, the higher the economic uncertainties, the worse the monetary policy cross-cycle adjustment effects, which, however, can be increased by intensifying monetary policy regulation. Fourth, in the economic recession stage, quantity-based monetary policy has advantage over price-based monetary policy in cross-cycle adjustments, while both of the above policies have no cross-cycle adjustment in the economic growth stage. Fifth, policy expectation plays an important role in cross-cycle adjustment, and reinforcing expectations is the key to realizing cross-cycle adjustment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国货币政策是否存在跨周期调整?
摘要 为解决货币政策跨周期调整的理论和实践争议,本文基于实证数据探讨了中国货币政策跨周期调整可能产生的影响。利用2000年第一季度至2021年第四季度的中国宏观经济数据,采用HP滤波法测算经济周期波动趋势,采用三阶段SETAR模型和趋势突变点识别法分别识别两类周期,采用FAVAR模型对货币政策跨周期调整的有效性进行实证判断。我们有以下研究结论。第一,货币政策对总产出具有一定的跨周期调节作用,但具有相当强的状态依赖性。第二,货币政策对工业产出没有跨周期调节作用。第三,经济不确定性越高,货币政策的跨周期调节效应越差,但可以通过加强货币政策调控来提高跨周期调节效应。第四,在经济衰退阶段,数量型货币政策比价格型货币政策具有跨周期调节优势,而在经济增长阶段,上述两种政策都不具有跨周期调节作用。第五,政策预期在跨周期调节中具有重要作用,强化预期是实现跨周期调节的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Common Prosperity and Reshaping China’s Economic Cycle: Theoretical Logic and Empirical Evidence from a Political Economic Perspective Fiscal Pressure, Inter-Industrial Allocation of Land and Agglomerations Effects Digital Trade Rules and the Position of Chinese Enterprises in the Global Value Chain Digital Transformation, Information Search, and Women’s High-Quality Employment Analysis on Trade Gains from the Economic Dual Circulation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1