Awareness of Digital Reporting of Adverse Drug Events among Health Care Professionals

Shweta Sharma, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Meghna Pandey, Komal Kuldeep Singh
{"title":"Awareness of Digital Reporting of Adverse Drug Events among Health Care Professionals","authors":"Shweta Sharma, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Meghna Pandey, Komal Kuldeep Singh","doi":"10.21608/ijma.2023.234030.1801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article information Background: Digital reporting of adverse events remains the most important tool to improve pharmacovigilance information related to drugs introduced in the market with good efficacy and limited safety knowledge perceived from clinical trials. Aim of the Study: The study aimed to identify the knowledge and awareness of digital reporting of adverse drug events among healthcare professionals working at a tertiary care hospital in India. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive questionnaire-based study was conducted with Physicians, Pharmacists, Technicians and Nurses. The questionnaire comprised items regarding awareness of pharmacovigilance and digital reporting of ADRs and perception and attitudes of healthcare professionals in digital reporting of adverse drug events. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Results: Healthcare professionals received 200 questionnaires in total, and 200 participants responded, yielding a 100% response rate among which 108 were male and 92 were female. 98 doctors, 32 pharmacists, 11 technicians, and 59 nurses comprised the group of healthcare professionals. 72% of healthcare professionals were familiar with the phrase \"pharmacovigilance.\" Nearly 73% of healthcare professionals did not know the method of digital reporting of ADR and their nearby pharmacovigilance centers. In addition, 88% agreed that ADRs need to be reported digitally because it is easy and convenient and 92% agreed that it is their professional responsibility. Conclusion: Our study shows that awareness of pharmaco-vigilance and digital ADR reporting among healthcare professionals is relatively low.","PeriodicalId":53130,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2023.234030.1801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article information Background: Digital reporting of adverse events remains the most important tool to improve pharmacovigilance information related to drugs introduced in the market with good efficacy and limited safety knowledge perceived from clinical trials. Aim of the Study: The study aimed to identify the knowledge and awareness of digital reporting of adverse drug events among healthcare professionals working at a tertiary care hospital in India. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive questionnaire-based study was conducted with Physicians, Pharmacists, Technicians and Nurses. The questionnaire comprised items regarding awareness of pharmacovigilance and digital reporting of ADRs and perception and attitudes of healthcare professionals in digital reporting of adverse drug events. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Results: Healthcare professionals received 200 questionnaires in total, and 200 participants responded, yielding a 100% response rate among which 108 were male and 92 were female. 98 doctors, 32 pharmacists, 11 technicians, and 59 nurses comprised the group of healthcare professionals. 72% of healthcare professionals were familiar with the phrase "pharmacovigilance." Nearly 73% of healthcare professionals did not know the method of digital reporting of ADR and their nearby pharmacovigilance centers. In addition, 88% agreed that ADRs need to be reported digitally because it is easy and convenient and 92% agreed that it is their professional responsibility. Conclusion: Our study shows that awareness of pharmaco-vigilance and digital ADR reporting among healthcare professionals is relatively low.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员对数字化报告药物不良事件的认识
文章信息 背景:不良事件的数字化报告仍然是改善药物警戒信息的最重要工具,这些信息与从临床试验中获得的疗效良好而安全性有限的药物引入市场有关。研究目的本研究旨在确定在印度一家三级医院工作的医护人员对数字化报告药物不良事件的了解和认识。材料与方法:对医生、药剂师、技术人员和护士进行了横断面描述性问卷调查。问卷调查的项目包括对药物警戒和不良反应数字化报告的认识,以及医护人员对药物不良反应数字化报告的看法和态度。数据分析采用了描述性统计方法。结果医疗保健专业人员共收到 200 份问卷,200 名参与者作了回复,回复率为 100%,其中男性 108 人,女性 92 人。医护人员中包括 98 名医生、32 名药剂师、11 名技术人员和 59 名护士。72%的医护人员熟悉 "药物警戒 "一词。近 73% 的医护人员不知道 ADR 的数字报告方法和附近的药物警戒中心。此外,88% 的医护人员认为需要以数字方式报告 ADR,因为这既简单又方便,92% 的医护人员认为这是他们的职业责任。结论我们的研究表明,医护人员对药物警戒和数字化 ADR 报告的认知度相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unilateral Stereotactic Radiofrequency Thalamotomy for Tremors in Parkinson’s Patients Study of Early versus Delayed Oral Fluid and Food after Cesarean Section Comparative Study Between the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Mini Gastric Bypass for Morbidly Obese Patients Effect of Resistance Training on Physical Performance in Underweight Females Efficacy of Topical Latanoprost Versus Topical Minoxidil In the Treatment of Alopecia Areata: Clinical and Dermoscopic Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1