Business Schools: Rex 1970

Q2 Arts and Humanities Historical Studies in Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3828/hsir.2023.44.6
Martin Parker
{"title":"Business Schools: Rex 1970","authors":"Martin Parker","doi":"10.3828/hsir.2023.44.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On Wednesday 3 June 1970, Warwick University’s Board of Social Studies discussed a memorandum cautioning against the expansion of ‘business studies’ by John Rex, the recently arrived professor of sociology. Distinguishing industrial relations from business studies, he argued that the latter should not be taught as an undergraduate discipline. Coming so soon after the issue of the ‘Warwick Files’, Rex’s memorandum was delivered into a charged situation in which many students and staff had become profoundly disenchanted with the university’s management. However, fifty years later the business school now dominates Warwick and almost all UK universities, being both its cash machine and its operating language. Industrial relations has been eclipsed as a field of enquiry but more important is the way that business and management practice now provides the operating language and governance of the university itself. It is now far too late to imagine that universities might have nothing to do with business, but there is an opportunity to radicalize what ‘business studies’ means. If we shut down the business school, then we must replace it with the School for Organizing, a place for studying how we rescue ourselves from carbon capitalism.","PeriodicalId":36746,"journal":{"name":"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/hsir.2023.44.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On Wednesday 3 June 1970, Warwick University’s Board of Social Studies discussed a memorandum cautioning against the expansion of ‘business studies’ by John Rex, the recently arrived professor of sociology. Distinguishing industrial relations from business studies, he argued that the latter should not be taught as an undergraduate discipline. Coming so soon after the issue of the ‘Warwick Files’, Rex’s memorandum was delivered into a charged situation in which many students and staff had become profoundly disenchanted with the university’s management. However, fifty years later the business school now dominates Warwick and almost all UK universities, being both its cash machine and its operating language. Industrial relations has been eclipsed as a field of enquiry but more important is the way that business and management practice now provides the operating language and governance of the university itself. It is now far too late to imagine that universities might have nothing to do with business, but there is an opportunity to radicalize what ‘business studies’ means. If we shut down the business school, then we must replace it with the School for Organizing, a place for studying how we rescue ourselves from carbon capitalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商学院:雷克斯 1970
1970 年 6 月 3 日星期三,华威大学社会研究委员会讨论了一份备忘录,该备忘录由新到任的社会学教授约翰-雷克斯(John Rex)撰写,旨在警告不要扩大 "商业研究 "的范围。他将劳资关系与商业研究区分开来,认为后者不应该作为一门本科学科来教授。雷克斯的备忘录是在 "华威档案 "发行后不久发表的,当时许多学生和教职员工都对学校的管理深感不满。 然而,50 年后的今天,商学院已经成为华威大学乃至英国几乎所有大学的主宰,既是大学的提款机,也是大学的运营语言。作为一个研究领域,劳资关系已经黯然失色,但更重要的是,商业和管理实践现在提供了大学本身的运作语言和管理方式。现在设想大学与商业无关已经为时过晚,但我们有机会彻底改变 "商业研究 "的含义。如果我们关闭了商学院,那么我们就必须用 "组织学院 "取而代之,这是一个研究我们如何从碳资本主义中拯救自己的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Historical Studies in Industrial Relations
Historical Studies in Industrial Relations Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
George Bain and Memories of the Bullock Committee on Industrial Democracy The British Printers’ 40-Hour-Week Strike of 1959: Background, Dispute, and Aftermath Canteen Workers’ Wages and Collective-Bargaining Arrangements in British Coal Undermining the ‘Polder Model’: Workers’ Militancy and Trade-Union Leadership in Four Dutch Wildcat Strikes, 1963–1970 Reflections on the Committee of Inquiry on Industrial Democracy, 1975–1977, Chaired by Alan Bullock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1