Quo Vadis Internal Audit Professional Standard In The Public Service Agency

Toni Andrianto, Yayuk Nurjanah
{"title":"Quo Vadis Internal Audit Professional Standard In The Public Service Agency","authors":"Toni Andrianto, Yayuk Nurjanah","doi":"10.52155/ijpsat.v40.1.5566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract—Auditor is a profession that is highly regulated. One of the regulations that guides the internal auditor profession is the internal audit professional standard. In the public domain, the Association of Indonesian Government Internal Auditors has compiled the preparation of Government Internal Audit Professional Practices and Indonesian Government Internal Audit Standards. The Public Service Agency places itself in a unique position as a state-owned institution that manages the nation's indivisible assets. BLU manages APBN funds as well as recruits professionals who have specific expertise in their fields. The purpose of writing this paper is [1] to obtain information on what the actual position of the SPI profession is at BLU in terms of changing the framework and standards used as work guidelines in the implementation of internal audits; [2] To obtain information on the implementation of audit standard applications in Public Service Agencies and what are the obstacles in terms of its implementation, and [3] To obtain information on how best to apply standard audits in Public Service Agencies. The results of the study show that in the personal aspect, a standard is able to provide guidance on how to act or behave in everyday life, while in the professional aspect, a standard is a mandatory component that must be used by professionals in carrying out their practice. In the private sphere, internal auditing standards have been formulated by the IIA. One part of the IPPF is the Internal Auditor Professional Standards. This standard is an important and essential part in realizing the role and performance of internal auditors both individually as professionals and by the internal audit unit as an organ within the company. In the public domain, the Association of Indonesian Government Internal Auditors has compiled the preparation of Government Internal Audit Professional Practices (KP3IP) and Indonesian Government Internal Audit Standards. SAIPI must be applied by APIP leaders and Auditors in all internal control activities, including audit activities as referred to in article 53 of Government Regulation number 60 of 2008. BLU is an institution engaged in the public sector (APBN funding and state financial accountability) but also engaged in private sector (business process). The 'hybrid' mechanism places the internal oversight unit in a unique position. On the one hand, BLU auditors must function as a guarantee to examine aspects of internal control over the use of state finance, but on the other hand, many BLU auditors are not civil servants (Non PNS). Currently there is no confirmation or standard setting that must be adhered to by institutions such as public service agencies. Another aspect that becomes capital in the status of BLU auditors is confirmation whether they are APIP or outside the division as APIP. Auditing standards will protect the auditor as well as the institution (client) being audited. The presumption that the internal auditor is not optimal with the many conditions or findings of the external auditor can actually be overcome by having audit standards. Auditing standards will protect internal auditors if cases occur in internal institutions, both irregularities and fraud. Internal audit standards comprehensively guide internal auditors in carrying out their functions for both the insurance function and the consulting function.","PeriodicalId":411069,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v40.1.5566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract—Auditor is a profession that is highly regulated. One of the regulations that guides the internal auditor profession is the internal audit professional standard. In the public domain, the Association of Indonesian Government Internal Auditors has compiled the preparation of Government Internal Audit Professional Practices and Indonesian Government Internal Audit Standards. The Public Service Agency places itself in a unique position as a state-owned institution that manages the nation's indivisible assets. BLU manages APBN funds as well as recruits professionals who have specific expertise in their fields. The purpose of writing this paper is [1] to obtain information on what the actual position of the SPI profession is at BLU in terms of changing the framework and standards used as work guidelines in the implementation of internal audits; [2] To obtain information on the implementation of audit standard applications in Public Service Agencies and what are the obstacles in terms of its implementation, and [3] To obtain information on how best to apply standard audits in Public Service Agencies. The results of the study show that in the personal aspect, a standard is able to provide guidance on how to act or behave in everyday life, while in the professional aspect, a standard is a mandatory component that must be used by professionals in carrying out their practice. In the private sphere, internal auditing standards have been formulated by the IIA. One part of the IPPF is the Internal Auditor Professional Standards. This standard is an important and essential part in realizing the role and performance of internal auditors both individually as professionals and by the internal audit unit as an organ within the company. In the public domain, the Association of Indonesian Government Internal Auditors has compiled the preparation of Government Internal Audit Professional Practices (KP3IP) and Indonesian Government Internal Audit Standards. SAIPI must be applied by APIP leaders and Auditors in all internal control activities, including audit activities as referred to in article 53 of Government Regulation number 60 of 2008. BLU is an institution engaged in the public sector (APBN funding and state financial accountability) but also engaged in private sector (business process). The 'hybrid' mechanism places the internal oversight unit in a unique position. On the one hand, BLU auditors must function as a guarantee to examine aspects of internal control over the use of state finance, but on the other hand, many BLU auditors are not civil servants (Non PNS). Currently there is no confirmation or standard setting that must be adhered to by institutions such as public service agencies. Another aspect that becomes capital in the status of BLU auditors is confirmation whether they are APIP or outside the division as APIP. Auditing standards will protect the auditor as well as the institution (client) being audited. The presumption that the internal auditor is not optimal with the many conditions or findings of the external auditor can actually be overcome by having audit standards. Auditing standards will protect internal auditors if cases occur in internal institutions, both irregularities and fraud. Internal audit standards comprehensively guide internal auditors in carrying out their functions for both the insurance function and the consulting function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共服务机构内部审计专业标准的现状
摘要--审计师是一个受到严格监管的职业。指导内部审计师职业的法规之一是内部审计职业标准。在公共领域,印度尼西亚政府内部审计师协会编制了《政府内部审计专业实务》和《印度尼西亚政府内部审计标准》。作为管理国家不可分割资产的国有机构,公共服务署的地位独特。BLU 管理 APBN 的资金,并招聘在各自领域具有特殊专长的专业人员。撰写本文的目的是:[1] 了解在改变内部审计实施过程中作为工作指南的框架和标准方面,BLU 的 SPI 专业的实际情况;[2] 了解公共服务机构审计标准应用的实施情况,以及实施过程中存在的障碍;[3] 了解如何在公共服务机构更好地应用标准审计。研究结果表明,在个人方面,准则能够为日常生活中如何行动或行为提供指导,而在专业方面,准则是专业人员在开展业务时必须使用的强制性组成部分。在私营领域,内部审计师协会制定了内部审计标准。IPPF 的一个组成部分是《内部审计师职业标准》。该标准是实现内部审计师个人作为专业人员以及内部审计部门作为公司内部机构的作用和绩效的重要和基本部分。在公共领域,印度尼西亚政府内部审计师协会编制了《政府内部审计专业实务》(KP3IP)和《印度尼西亚政府内部审计标准》。根据 2008 年第 60 号政府条例第 53 条的规定,APIP 领导人和审计师必须在所有内部控制活动(包括审计活动)中适用 SAIPI。BLU 是一个从事公共部门(APBN 资金和国家财务责任)但也从事私营部门(业务流程)的机构。混合 "机制将内部监督单位置于一个独特的位置。一方面,BLU 审计员必须保证审查国家财政使用的内部控制方面,但另一方面,许多 BLU 审计员并不是公务员(非 PNS)。目前还没有公共服务机构等机构必须遵守的确认或标准设定。BLU 审计员地位的另一个方面是确认他们是 APIP 还是该部门以外的 APIP。审计标准将保护审计师和被审计机构(客户)。内部审计师的许多条件或外部审计师的审计结果并非最佳,这种假设实际上可以通过制定审计标准来克服。如果内部机构发生违规和欺诈案件,审计准则将保护内部审计师。内部审计准则全面指导内部审计师履行保险职能和咨询职能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ocular Gene Therapy: Literature Review Connaissances Des Vendeurs Du Marché Sur Les Risques Chimiques Des Composés Organiques Volatils « Cas Du Marché Bayaka » De La Commune De Ngiri-Ngiri,» A Kinshasa, République Démocratique Du Congo Analysis of ALL JOKOWI MENS in the 2024 RI Presidential Election Portée Et Impact De La Dérivé Sur Les Arthroodes Des Principaux Produits Phytosanitaires Utilises Des Cultures Maraichères Des Niayes Du Sénégal Gestion De Déchets Ménagers Solides Dans La Commune De Kintambo A Kinshasa En République Démocratique Du Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1