Democratização e Relações entre Público e Privado em Educação: provisão, sentido e conteúdo, no Brasil e Portugal (2015-2022)

Q4 Social Sciences Curriculo sem Fronteiras Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.35786/1645-1384.v23.1121
F. Antunes, V. Peroni
{"title":"Democratização e Relações entre Público e Privado em Educação: provisão, sentido e conteúdo, no Brasil e Portugal (2015-2022)","authors":"F. Antunes, V. Peroni","doi":"10.35786/1645-1384.v23.1121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationships between public and private are discussed as processes carried out by individual and collective subjects in relation that dispute the provision, direction, meaning, content and the policy of knowledge for education. In Brazil, stand out the involvement of the State and the strength of private collective subjects and social movements, committed to restoring traditional values, remaking education as a commodity and dismantling collective responsibility for the common good, diversity and social justice. In Portugal it is noticed, both the affirmation of public responsibility for compulsory education (with reinforcement of private intervention) and the lack of distinction between actors and(in) certain areas of public and private intervention and the mobilization of individual and private collective actors for the dispute of meaning and hegemony in education. On both sides of the Atlantic, the centrality of public education in democracies is reinforced, and undermined by the activism of ideological combinations that support both the neoliberal social agenda and the neoconservative restoration. In Brazil, the breadth of consequences of de-democratization processes in the field of education became more pronounced, in face of the ambivalence and duplicity of Portuguese public policies, boosted by the capillarity between actors, interests and public and private resources in education governance networks.","PeriodicalId":39270,"journal":{"name":"Curriculo sem Fronteiras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculo sem Fronteiras","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35786/1645-1384.v23.1121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationships between public and private are discussed as processes carried out by individual and collective subjects in relation that dispute the provision, direction, meaning, content and the policy of knowledge for education. In Brazil, stand out the involvement of the State and the strength of private collective subjects and social movements, committed to restoring traditional values, remaking education as a commodity and dismantling collective responsibility for the common good, diversity and social justice. In Portugal it is noticed, both the affirmation of public responsibility for compulsory education (with reinforcement of private intervention) and the lack of distinction between actors and(in) certain areas of public and private intervention and the mobilization of individual and private collective actors for the dispute of meaning and hegemony in education. On both sides of the Atlantic, the centrality of public education in democracies is reinforced, and undermined by the activism of ideological combinations that support both the neoliberal social agenda and the neoconservative restoration. In Brazil, the breadth of consequences of de-democratization processes in the field of education became more pronounced, in face of the ambivalence and duplicity of Portuguese public policies, boosted by the capillarity between actors, interests and public and private resources in education governance networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育领域的民主化和公私关系:巴西和葡萄牙的教育供给、意义和内容(2015-2022 年)
公共和私人之间的关系被视为个人和集体主体在教育的提供、方向、意义、内容和知识政策方面发生争议的过程。在巴西,既有国家的参与,也有私人集体主体和社会运动的力量,他们致力于恢复传统价值观,将教育重新塑造为商品,解除集体对共同利益、多样性和社会公正的责任。在葡萄牙,人们注意到,既有对义务教育公共责任的肯定(同时加强了私人干预),也有在某些公共和私人干预领域缺乏行为者和行为者之间的区别,以及动员个人和私人集体行为者对教育的意义和霸权进行争论。在大西洋两岸,公共教育在民主政体中的中心地位得到了加强,同时也被支持新自由主义社会议程和新保守主义复辟的意识形态组合的积极行动所削弱。在巴西,面对葡萄牙公共政策的矛盾性和两面性,以及教育管理网络中参与者、利益和公私资源之间的协同作用,教育领域去民主化进程的广泛后果变得更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculo sem Fronteiras
Curriculo sem Fronteiras Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Políticas e Práticas Avaliativas: outras possibilidades de interpretar antigos problemas Ideias para Adiar o Fim das Infâncias: currículo, alfabetização e avaliação na educação infantil A Dimensão do Sensível nas Normativas Curriculares Legais para a Formação de Professores Políticas Curriculares e Relações de Gênero nos Currículos da Educação Básica: perspectivas teórico-epistemológicas Políticas de Avaliação como Políticas de Currículo: a ‘alquimia’ da Matemática no Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1