When core sorting and quality grading is beneficial to remanufacturers: Insights from analytical models

X.H. Cao, X.L. Shi, H.J. Lan, D. Huang
{"title":"When core sorting and quality grading is beneficial to remanufacturers: Insights from analytical models","authors":"X.H. Cao, X.L. Shi, H.J. Lan, D. Huang","doi":"10.14743/apem2023.2.465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we study the core acquisition and remanufacturing problem in which the remanufactured products are produced from acquired cores with uncertain quality condition, and are used to satisfy customer demand. Decision-making models are developed to examine the potential value of core sorting and quality grading in the remanufacturing system: a single-period model with deterministic demand, and a single-period model with stochastic demand (i.e., a newsvendor-type model). In each model, both the sorting strategy and the non-sorting strategy are discussed and compared. Our theoretical and numerical results show that: (1) In the deterministic demand case, core sorting is cost-effective only when the unit sorting cost is below a threshold value and the unit acquisition cost falls into a specific interval. Furthermore, in the case with two quality grades the adoption of sorting strategy with respect to the expected fraction of high-quality cores may be non-monotone: an initial increase in the expected fraction of high-quality cores may motivate a switch to core sorting, however, further increase in the expected fraction may motivate a reverse switch; (2) Similarly, in the stochastic demand case, the sorting strategy also becomes unattractive when the unit sorting cost is sufficiently high. In addition, the value of core sorting will be better off under more fluctuating demand for remanufactured products if the sorting strategy is the dominant strategy. Otherwise, it will be worse off.","PeriodicalId":445710,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2023.2.465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we study the core acquisition and remanufacturing problem in which the remanufactured products are produced from acquired cores with uncertain quality condition, and are used to satisfy customer demand. Decision-making models are developed to examine the potential value of core sorting and quality grading in the remanufacturing system: a single-period model with deterministic demand, and a single-period model with stochastic demand (i.e., a newsvendor-type model). In each model, both the sorting strategy and the non-sorting strategy are discussed and compared. Our theoretical and numerical results show that: (1) In the deterministic demand case, core sorting is cost-effective only when the unit sorting cost is below a threshold value and the unit acquisition cost falls into a specific interval. Furthermore, in the case with two quality grades the adoption of sorting strategy with respect to the expected fraction of high-quality cores may be non-monotone: an initial increase in the expected fraction of high-quality cores may motivate a switch to core sorting, however, further increase in the expected fraction may motivate a reverse switch; (2) Similarly, in the stochastic demand case, the sorting strategy also becomes unattractive when the unit sorting cost is sufficiently high. In addition, the value of core sorting will be better off under more fluctuating demand for remanufactured products if the sorting strategy is the dominant strategy. Otherwise, it will be worse off.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核心分类和质量分级何时对再制造商有利?分析模型的启示
在本文中,我们研究了磁芯获取和再制造问题,在这一问题中,再制造产品是由质量状况不确定的获取磁芯生产的,并用于满足客户需求。本文建立了一些决策模型,以研究再制造系统中芯材分类和质量分级的潜在价值:一个具有确定性需求的单周期模型和一个具有随机性需求的单周期模型(即新闻供应商型模型)。在每个模型中,我们都对分类策略和非分类策略进行了讨论和比较。我们的理论和数值结果表明(1) 在确定性需求的情况下,只有当单位分拣成本低于临界值,且单位采购成本位于特定区间时,核心分拣才具有成本效益。此外,在有两个质量等级的情况下,相对于高质量磁芯的预期分量,采用分拣策略可能是非单调的:高质量磁芯预期分量的最初增加可能会促使转向磁芯分拣,然而,预期分量的进一步增加可能会促使反向转换;(2) 同样,在随机需求情况下,当单位分拣成本足够高时,分拣策略也变得缺乏吸引力。此外,在再制造产品需求波动较大的情况下,如果分拣策略是主导策略,那么核心分拣的价值会更好。否则,情况会更糟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing smart manufacturing systems using digital twin IoT-based Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) algorithm for voltage stability control and monitoring of solar power generation Reduction of surface defects by optimization of casting speed using genetic programming: An industrial case study Incentive modeling analysis in engineering applications and projects with stochastic duration time Comparing Fault Tree Analysis methods combined with Generalized Grey Relation Analysis: A new approach and case study in the automotive industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1