Privatised Academic Writing: Reflections on Access, Knowledge, and Policy

Bruce Horner
{"title":"Privatised Academic Writing: Reflections on Access, Knowledge, and Policy","authors":"Bruce Horner","doi":"10.18552/joaw.v13i1.577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This dialogue responds to Neculai (2018) and argues for the need to recognise the character of academic literacies development and the policies governing that development as always emergent. It also reflects on the contributions that all, including students, make toward that development through their written work, as opposed to accepting the treatment of academic literacies development as a commodity to which access is given.","PeriodicalId":202793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Writing","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v13i1.577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This dialogue responds to Neculai (2018) and argues for the need to recognise the character of academic literacies development and the policies governing that development as always emergent. It also reflects on the contributions that all, including students, make toward that development through their written work, as opposed to accepting the treatment of academic literacies development as a commodity to which access is given.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私有化的学术写作:关于获取、知识和政策的思考
本对话回应了 Neculai (2018)的观点,认为需要认识到学术扫盲发展的特点以及管理该发展的政策始终是新兴的。它还反思了包括学生在内的所有人通过其书面作品为这一发展做出的贡献,而不是接受将学术素养发展作为一种商品来对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Should Digital Tools for Writing be Evaluated? Reflections from Digital Pedagogies and Applied Linguistics Written notes and listening comprehension: A correlation study The Power Hour of Writing: An empirical evaluation of our online writing community On the perceived usefulness and effectiveness of Eduflow as a supplementary tool for online writing instruction A Palimpsest of Practice-led Inquiry: A Conversation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1