Comparison of Crystalloid Preloading and Coloading for Prevention of Spinal-induced Hypotension in Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial at a Tertiary Facility in Ghana

A. Quarshie, A. Anno, R. Djagbletey, Pokua Sarpong, Daniel Sottie, Brenda J. Phillips, Phyllis Demi Lassey, George Aryee, Raymond Essuman, Ebenezer Owusu Darkwa
{"title":"Comparison of Crystalloid Preloading and Coloading for Prevention of Spinal-induced Hypotension in Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial at a Tertiary Facility in Ghana","authors":"A. Quarshie, A. Anno, R. Djagbletey, Pokua Sarpong, Daniel Sottie, Brenda J. Phillips, Phyllis Demi Lassey, George Aryee, Raymond Essuman, Ebenezer Owusu Darkwa","doi":"10.3889/oamjms.2023.11657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is the recommended technique for cesarean section. It is easy to perform and provides a reliable, safe, effective, and fast sensory and motor block of high quality. Hypotension, which can be deleterious to both mother and  baby, is however a common side effect. Preloading has not been shown to consistently prevent spinal-induced hypotension. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare coloading with preloading using crystalloids for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was conducted on 88 patients at term scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. Parturients were randomly assigned to receive a preload of 12.5 mL/kg of Ringer’s Lactate (Group P) before the spinal anesthetic or a coload of 12.5 mL/kg of Ringers Lactate (Group C) at the time of the spinal procedure. Blood pressure, heart rate, incidence and timing of nausea and vomiting, and amount and frequency of vasopressor used were recorded for the first 10 minutes post-spinal anesthesia. Neonatal Apgar scores were determined at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, height, gestational age, ASA classification, baseline hemodynamic  measurements, time to onset of hypotension, and time to delivery of baby post-spinal anesthesia. Post-spinal anesthesia changes in the heart  rate, systolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure were also comparable between the two groups. None of the patients in both groups experienced nausea or vomiting without hypotension. Although the cumulative dose of ephedrine to treat hypotension in the preload group was  higher compared to the coload group, the difference was not statistically significant (16.3 vs. 12.4; p-value = 0.110). CONCLUSION: Preloading and coloading with 12.5 mL/kg of Ringer’s Lactate are comparable but neither is effective alone for preventing spinal-induced hypotension in the obstetric population. A vasopressor regimen is required to improve efficacy of the fluid load for preventing spinal-induced hypotension.","PeriodicalId":19562,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is the recommended technique for cesarean section. It is easy to perform and provides a reliable, safe, effective, and fast sensory and motor block of high quality. Hypotension, which can be deleterious to both mother and  baby, is however a common side effect. Preloading has not been shown to consistently prevent spinal-induced hypotension. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare coloading with preloading using crystalloids for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was conducted on 88 patients at term scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. Parturients were randomly assigned to receive a preload of 12.5 mL/kg of Ringer’s Lactate (Group P) before the spinal anesthetic or a coload of 12.5 mL/kg of Ringers Lactate (Group C) at the time of the spinal procedure. Blood pressure, heart rate, incidence and timing of nausea and vomiting, and amount and frequency of vasopressor used were recorded for the first 10 minutes post-spinal anesthesia. Neonatal Apgar scores were determined at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, height, gestational age, ASA classification, baseline hemodynamic  measurements, time to onset of hypotension, and time to delivery of baby post-spinal anesthesia. Post-spinal anesthesia changes in the heart  rate, systolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure were also comparable between the two groups. None of the patients in both groups experienced nausea or vomiting without hypotension. Although the cumulative dose of ephedrine to treat hypotension in the preload group was  higher compared to the coload group, the difference was not statistically significant (16.3 vs. 12.4; p-value = 0.110). CONCLUSION: Preloading and coloading with 12.5 mL/kg of Ringer’s Lactate are comparable but neither is effective alone for preventing spinal-induced hypotension in the obstetric population. A vasopressor regimen is required to improve efficacy of the fluid load for preventing spinal-induced hypotension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在剖宫产手术中预防脊柱诱发低血压的晶体液预载和加量比较:加纳一家三级医院的随机对照试验
背景:脊髓麻醉是剖腹产的推荐技术。它易于操作,能提供可靠、安全、有效和快速的高质量感觉和运动阻滞。然而,低血压是一种常见的副作用,会对母婴造成危害。目前还没有证据表明预负荷能持续预防脊柱引起的低血压。目的:本研究的目的是比较使用晶体液进行结肠装载和预载,以预防预定剖宫产的产妇出现脊髓麻醉引起的低血压。材料和方法:这项单盲、随机对照研究在科勒布教学医院对 88 名预定在脊髓麻醉下进行择期剖宫产的足月患者进行了研究。产妇被随机分配到脊柱麻醉前接受每公斤 12.5 毫升林格氏乳酸盐的预负荷(P 组)或脊柱手术时接受每公斤 12.5 毫升林格氏乳酸盐的补给(C 组)。记录脊髓麻醉后最初 10 分钟内的血压、心率、恶心和呕吐的发生率和时间,以及血管抑制剂的用量和频率。新生儿 Apgar 评分在出生后 1 分钟和 5 分钟测定。结果:两组在年龄、体重、身高、胎龄、ASA 分级、基线血流动力学测量、低血压发生时间和椎管内麻醉后婴儿娩出时间方面具有可比性。两组患者在椎管内麻醉后的心率、收缩压和平均动脉血压变化也相当。两组患者均无恶心或呕吐,无低血压。虽然预负荷组治疗低血压的麻黄碱累积剂量高于负荷组,但差异无统计学意义(16.3 对 12.4;P 值 = 0.110)。结论:使用 12.5 毫升/千克的林格氏乳酸盐进行预负荷和结肠负荷效果相当,但两者都不能有效预防产科患者因脊柱引起的低血压。需要使用血管加压疗法来提高液体负荷预防脊柱诱发低血压的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1225
期刊介绍: Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS) [formerly known as Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences] is a top-tier open access medical science journal published by the ID Design 2012/DOOEL Skopje, Rajko Zhinzifov No 48, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. OAMJMS is an international, modern, general medical journal covering all areas in the medical sciences, from basic studies to large clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses. We publish mostly human studies that substantially enhance our understanding of disease epidemiology, etiology, and physiology; the development of prognostic and diagnostic technologies; trials that test the efficacy of specific interventions and those that compare different treatments; and systematic reviews. We aim to promote translation of basic research into clinical investigation, and of clinical evidence into practice. We publish occasional studies in animal models when they report outstanding research findings that are highly clinically relevant. Our audience is the international medical community as well as educators, policy makers, patient advocacy groups, and interested members of the public around the world. OAMJMS is published quarterly online version. The Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS) publishes Medical Informatics, Basic Science, Clinical Science, Case Report, Brief Communication, Public Health, Public Policy, and Review Article from all fields of medicine and related fields. This journal also publishes, continuously or occasionally, the bibliographies of the members of the Society, medical history, medical publications, thesis abstracts, book reviews, reports on meetings, i­n­formation on future meetings, important events and dates, and various headings which contribute to the development of the corresponding scientific field.
期刊最新文献
Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workplace of Physiotherapists: Occupational Risk Factors and Their Role in Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review A Rare Case of Gastric Metastasis from a Rare Case of Mucosal Malignant Melanoma Studying the Specific (Adaptogenic and Anabolic) Activity of the Supramolecular Complex of 20-Hydroxyecdysone Triacetate with β-Cyclodextrin Herbal Bioactive Compounds for Skin Infections and Inflammatory Conditions Case Report: Is Intravenous Immunoglobulin Important when Used Together with Pulse Steroid! Complete recovery within 1 Month of Pediatric Patient Diagnosed with Transverse Myelitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1