A comprehensive study on natural farming practices - Adoption and impact on crop yield and farmer’s income

D. Rao, K. T. Rao, P. B. P. Kumar, P. J. Rao
{"title":"A comprehensive study on natural farming practices - Adoption and impact on crop yield and farmer’s income","authors":"D. Rao, K. T. Rao, P. B. P. Kumar, P. J. Rao","doi":"10.15740/has/ijps/18.2/147-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural farming, also known as Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF), has gained significant attention and debate among agricultural scientists, government officials, farmers, and various other groups involved in agriculture in India. There are two contrasting perspectives on this topic, with some scientists dismissing the philosophy of Natural Farming while proponents claim it to be a solution for the challenges faced by Indian agriculture, particularly for smallholder farmers. This study aims to address critical questions and gaps related to Natural Farming by investigating farmers’ perceptions, the components of natural farming practices they follow, input use patterns, benefit-cost ratios, constraints in adoption, and suggestions for improvement. The study conducted with 150 farmers from Anakapalle and Visakhapatnam districts aimed to investigate the perceptions, components, input use patterns, constraints, and suggestions related to Natural Farming. The findings revealed that most of the farmers were middle-aged (65.34%) with secondary education (50.67%) and significant farming experience (20.00% above 30 years). The farmers perceived Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) as agriculture without external inputs and labour (94.67%), acknowledging its role in conserving beneficial insects (93.34%) and soil fertility (92.00%). Jeevamrutham (92.00%) and crop rotation (90.67%) were the most widely adopted components of ZBNF. When comparing costs and returns, ZBNF paddy and sugarcane farmers incurred 18.55% and 19.56% less expenditure, respectively, compared to non-ZBNF farmers. However, net profits were lower for ZBNF farmers. The constraints in adopting ZBNF practices included chemically contaminated neighbouring fields (58.92%), the absence of specific prices for organic products (36.14%), difficulty in convincing family members (56.40%), and the lengthy transition period (45.23%). These insights shed light on the status and challenges faced by farmers in implementing Natural Farming practices. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into farmers’ perceptions, adoption of natural farming practices, costs and returns, and constraints faced in the adoption of ZBNF. These findings can inform policymakers, researchers, and farmers themselves in further developing and promoting sustainable agricultural practices in India.","PeriodicalId":507861,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15740/has/ijps/18.2/147-153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural farming, also known as Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF), has gained significant attention and debate among agricultural scientists, government officials, farmers, and various other groups involved in agriculture in India. There are two contrasting perspectives on this topic, with some scientists dismissing the philosophy of Natural Farming while proponents claim it to be a solution for the challenges faced by Indian agriculture, particularly for smallholder farmers. This study aims to address critical questions and gaps related to Natural Farming by investigating farmers’ perceptions, the components of natural farming practices they follow, input use patterns, benefit-cost ratios, constraints in adoption, and suggestions for improvement. The study conducted with 150 farmers from Anakapalle and Visakhapatnam districts aimed to investigate the perceptions, components, input use patterns, constraints, and suggestions related to Natural Farming. The findings revealed that most of the farmers were middle-aged (65.34%) with secondary education (50.67%) and significant farming experience (20.00% above 30 years). The farmers perceived Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) as agriculture without external inputs and labour (94.67%), acknowledging its role in conserving beneficial insects (93.34%) and soil fertility (92.00%). Jeevamrutham (92.00%) and crop rotation (90.67%) were the most widely adopted components of ZBNF. When comparing costs and returns, ZBNF paddy and sugarcane farmers incurred 18.55% and 19.56% less expenditure, respectively, compared to non-ZBNF farmers. However, net profits were lower for ZBNF farmers. The constraints in adopting ZBNF practices included chemically contaminated neighbouring fields (58.92%), the absence of specific prices for organic products (36.14%), difficulty in convincing family members (56.40%), and the lengthy transition period (45.23%). These insights shed light on the status and challenges faced by farmers in implementing Natural Farming practices. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into farmers’ perceptions, adoption of natural farming practices, costs and returns, and constraints faced in the adoption of ZBNF. These findings can inform policymakers, researchers, and farmers themselves in further developing and promoting sustainable agricultural practices in India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然农耕方法综合研究--采用情况及其对作物产量和农民收入的影响
自然农法,又称零预算自然农法(ZBNF),在印度的农业科学家、政府官员、农民和其他各种农业团体中引起了极大的关注和争论。对这一话题存在两种截然不同的观点,一些科学家否定了自然农法的理念,而支持者则声称自然农法是解决印度农业,尤其是小农农业所面临挑战的一种方法。本研究旨在通过调查农民的观念、他们遵循的自然农法的组成部分、投入品使用模式、效益成本比、采用自然农法的限制因素以及改进建议,解决与自然农法有关的关键问题和差距。这项研究的对象是来自阿纳卡帕勒和维萨卡帕特南地区的 150 名农民,目的是调查他们对自然农法的看法、构成要素、投入品使用模式、制约因素和相关建议。调查结果显示,大多数农民是中年人(65.34%),受过中等教育(50.67%),有丰富的农业经验(20.00%在 30 年以上)。农民认为零预算自然农法(ZBNF)是不需要外部投入和劳动力的农业(94.67%),承认其在保护益虫(93.34%)和土壤肥力(92.00%)方面的作用。Jeevamrutham(92.00%)和轮作(90.67%)是最广泛采用的 ZBNF 要素。在比较成本和收益时,与非 ZBNF 农民相比,ZBNF 水稻和甘蔗种植户的支出分别减少了 18.55% 和 19.56%。但是,ZBNF 农民的净利润较低。采用 ZBNF 实践的制约因素包括邻近田地受到化学污染(58.92%)、有机产品没有具体价格(36.14%)、难以说服家庭成员(56.40%)以及过渡期较长(45.23%)。这些见解揭示了农民在实施自然农法时所面临的现状和挑战。总之,本研究就农民的观念、自然农法的采用、成本和回报以及采用 ZBNF 时面临的制约因素提供了有价值的见解。这些发现可为政策制定者、研究人员和农民本身进一步发展和推广印度的可持续农业实践提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arctic walnuts! Nuts of Juglans (Juglandaceae) from the middle Eocene of Axel Heiberg Island, Northern Canada Divergence in responsiveness to soil biota and mycorrhizal partner-specificity between montane annual and coastal perennial ecotypes of yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus) Waif to invasive: The transatlantic migration and establishment of grasses introduced to North America with pre-20th century ship ballast Genetic variation and differentiation among Southern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana, var. silicicola) populations across its geographical range. Genetic variation and differentiation among Southern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana, var. silicicola) populations across its geographical range.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1