Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal AKM Konten Aljabar Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif

Grisa Fima Nurandika, Rooselyna Ekawati
{"title":"Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal AKM Konten Aljabar Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif","authors":"Grisa Fima Nurandika, Rooselyna Ekawati","doi":"10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n2.p414-433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) are vital skills that must be possessed. HOTS is a cognitive process that includes the levels of analyze (C4), evaluate (C5), and create (C6). The government's effort to improve HOTS is by promoting AKM. One of the factors that affect thinking skills is cognitive style. In mathematics, abstract ideas are often represented in the form of visual and verbal symbols. A Cognitive style that is associated with differences in visual and verbal reception of information is known as the visualizer-verbalizer cognitive style. This study is descriptive-qualitative research that aims to describe the profile of higher-order thinking skills of JHS students in solving AKM problems algebra content in terms of visualizer and verbalizer's cognitive style. The subjects of this study consisted of 2 students of grade IX with each visualizer and verbalizer student who had equal mathematical ability and the same gender. Research data collection techniques with AGK, AKM question tests, and interviews. Results of this study show that HOTS of visualizer at the analyze stage (C4) can identify any information that connected to solve the problem by first imagining the picture of the problem. At the evaluate stage (C5), carry out the process of checking and critiquing to make decisions. And at the create stage (C6), can make a hypothesis based on the result imagined in mind, then make a plan and implement it to obtain results. While verbalizer at the analyze stage (C4) can identify the information presented in the text that connected to solve the problem but less accurate in reading graphs. At the evaluate stage (C5), doesn't check the examination process but immediately makes a decision. And at the create stage (C6), can make a hypothesis based on their thinking then make a plan and implement it to obtain results that match with criteria.","PeriodicalId":31516,"journal":{"name":"MATHEdunesa","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATHEdunesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n2.p414-433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) are vital skills that must be possessed. HOTS is a cognitive process that includes the levels of analyze (C4), evaluate (C5), and create (C6). The government's effort to improve HOTS is by promoting AKM. One of the factors that affect thinking skills is cognitive style. In mathematics, abstract ideas are often represented in the form of visual and verbal symbols. A Cognitive style that is associated with differences in visual and verbal reception of information is known as the visualizer-verbalizer cognitive style. This study is descriptive-qualitative research that aims to describe the profile of higher-order thinking skills of JHS students in solving AKM problems algebra content in terms of visualizer and verbalizer's cognitive style. The subjects of this study consisted of 2 students of grade IX with each visualizer and verbalizer student who had equal mathematical ability and the same gender. Research data collection techniques with AGK, AKM question tests, and interviews. Results of this study show that HOTS of visualizer at the analyze stage (C4) can identify any information that connected to solve the problem by first imagining the picture of the problem. At the evaluate stage (C5), carry out the process of checking and critiquing to make decisions. And at the create stage (C6), can make a hypothesis based on the result imagined in mind, then make a plan and implement it to obtain results. While verbalizer at the analyze stage (C4) can identify the information presented in the text that connected to solve the problem but less accurate in reading graphs. At the evaluate stage (C5), doesn't check the examination process but immediately makes a decision. And at the create stage (C6), can make a hypothesis based on their thinking then make a plan and implement it to obtain results that match with criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于认知风格的初中生解决代数内容的 AKM 问题的高层次思维能力概况
高阶思维能力(HOTS)是必须掌握的重要技能。高阶思维能力是一个认知过程,包括分析(C4)、评估(C5)和创造(C6)三个层次。政府通过推广 AKM 来提高 HOTS。认知风格是影响思维能力的因素之一。在数学中,抽象概念通常以视觉和语言符号的形式表现出来。与视觉和语言接收信息的差异有关的认知风格被称为视觉-语言认知风格。本研究是一项描述性定量研究,旨在从视觉和语言认知风格的角度,描述日本高中学生在解决 AKM 问题代数内容时的高阶思维能力概况。研究对象包括 2 名九年级学生,每名学生的数学能力相同,性别相同。研究数据收集技术包括 AGK、AKM 问题测试和访谈。研究结果表明,在分析阶段(C4),形象思维者的 HOTS 可以通过首先想象问题的画面来识别与解决问题相关的任何信息。在评估阶段(C5),进行检查和批判以做出决定。而在创建阶段(C6),可以根据脑海中想象的结果做出假设,然后制定计划并实施,以获得结果。而在分析阶段(C4),语言表达能力强的学生能找出文本中与解决问题有关的信息,但读图的准确性较差。在评估阶段(C5),不会检查检查过程,而是立即做出决定。而在创建阶段(C6),可以根据自己的思考提出假设,然后制定计划并实施,以获得符合标准的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analisis kesalahan Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kontekstual pada Materi Perbandingan Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Penalaran Siswa SMA dalam Pembuktian Matematika pada Materi Trigonometri Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika Thinking Process of Junior High School Students in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Emotional Quotient Tren Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika di Jurnal Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Tahun 2021-2022 Representasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Teorema Pythagoras berdasarkan Tahapan Polya Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1