Copyrights for official works created by scientific and pedagogical workers

I.V. Myronenko, R. M. Heints
{"title":"Copyrights for official works created by scientific and pedagogical workers","authors":"I.V. Myronenko, R. M. Heints","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.62.2.1-2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the research of regulatory approaches regarding the copyright of scientific and pedagogical workers on official works in connection with the adoption of the new Law of Ukraine «On Copyright and Related Rights» on December 1, 2022. In the work, a comparative analysis of the definition of the concept of «official work» under current legislation with the legislation that was in force until January 1, 2023 was carried out, it was determined which works created by scientific and pedagogical workers are subject to the legal regime of official work.It has been established that the current legislation enshrines the presumption of ownership of property rights of a higher education institution for an official work created by a scientific and pedagogical employee. If there is no provision for changing this presumption in the employment contract (contract), then this can be done by concluding a civil law contract, the parties of which are the institution of higher education and the scientific and pedagogical worker. A conclusion was made about the need to supplement the employment contract (contract) with a condition regarding the property rights of the scientific and pedagogical worker to official works. Attention is drawn to the fact that today the subject of copyright can use the sign of legal protection (©) only to indicate his property rights. The conducted research does not exhaust all problematic aspects of the research topic. We see the prospect of its further study in solving questions, related to the implementation of copyright in this area.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.62.2.1-2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the research of regulatory approaches regarding the copyright of scientific and pedagogical workers on official works in connection with the adoption of the new Law of Ukraine «On Copyright and Related Rights» on December 1, 2022. In the work, a comparative analysis of the definition of the concept of «official work» under current legislation with the legislation that was in force until January 1, 2023 was carried out, it was determined which works created by scientific and pedagogical workers are subject to the legal regime of official work.It has been established that the current legislation enshrines the presumption of ownership of property rights of a higher education institution for an official work created by a scientific and pedagogical employee. If there is no provision for changing this presumption in the employment contract (contract), then this can be done by concluding a civil law contract, the parties of which are the institution of higher education and the scientific and pedagogical worker. A conclusion was made about the need to supplement the employment contract (contract) with a condition regarding the property rights of the scientific and pedagogical worker to official works. Attention is drawn to the fact that today the subject of copyright can use the sign of legal protection (©) only to indicate his property rights. The conducted research does not exhaust all problematic aspects of the research topic. We see the prospect of its further study in solving questions, related to the implementation of copyright in this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学和教育工作者创作的正式作品的版权
苺郕訄郇邽邿 郋迣訄郇邽郱郋赲訄郇郇 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕郋邾 郋迣訄郇邽郱郋赲訄郇郇 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕郋邾 郋迣訄郇邽郱郋赲訄郇郇 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕郋邾 苺郕訄郇邽 2022 郋郕.在这项工作中,对现行法律中 "正式作品 "概念的定义与 2023 年 1 月 1 日前生效的法律进行了比较分析,确定了哪些科学和教育工作者创作的作品受正式作品法律制度的管辖。如果就业合同(契约)中没有改变这一推定的规定,那么可以通过签订民法合同来实现,合同的双方是高等院校和科学教学工作者。得出的结论是,有必要在雇用合同(契约)中补充有关科学和教学工作者对正式作品的财产权的条件。需要注意的是,如今版权主体只能使用法律保护标志(©)来表明其财产权。所进行的研究并没有穷尽研究课题的所有问题。我们认为,在解决与该领域版权实施有关的问题方面,还有进一步研究的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidential activity of the court in civil and administrative proceedings: a comparative legal analysis The influence of jurisprudence of international treaty bodies on the interpretation of international treaties Administrative and legal mechanisms for ensuring the safety of the educational process in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine Simplified proceedings in the civil procedure of Poland Consideration of family cases by the court according to the rules of simplified litigation: a review of judicial practice and trends of change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1