One Perspective on the Evolution of Civil Wars Research

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Civil Wars Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/13698249.2023.2250274
Megan A. Stewart
{"title":"One Perspective on the Evolution of Civil Wars Research","authors":"Megan A. Stewart","doi":"10.1080/13698249.2023.2250274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay presents a perspective on the intellectual history and development of the field of civil wars. It argues that scholarship on civil wars has its origins in research on revolution and contentious politics. Over time, work on civil wars grew to become its own distinct research programme. The evolution of this programme has been characterised by three broad trends: conceptual and measurement refinement, a search for the optimal unit of analysis, and a reimagining of what is political in the context of civil wars. The intersection of these trends – which measures, assumptions, units, and concepts – tended to produce intellectual traditions within the civil wars field. The author contextualises herself within these traditions, then presents the promises and pitfalls of these underlying trends in the field for future research.","PeriodicalId":51785,"journal":{"name":"Civil Wars","volume":"2016 1","pages":"208 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2023.2250274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay presents a perspective on the intellectual history and development of the field of civil wars. It argues that scholarship on civil wars has its origins in research on revolution and contentious politics. Over time, work on civil wars grew to become its own distinct research programme. The evolution of this programme has been characterised by three broad trends: conceptual and measurement refinement, a search for the optimal unit of analysis, and a reimagining of what is political in the context of civil wars. The intersection of these trends – which measures, assumptions, units, and concepts – tended to produce intellectual traditions within the civil wars field. The author contextualises herself within these traditions, then presents the promises and pitfalls of these underlying trends in the field for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内战研究演变的一个视角
ABSTRACT 本文介绍了内战领域的思想史和发展。文章认为,有关内战的学术研究起源于对革命和有争议政治的研究。随着时间的推移,有关内战的研究逐渐发展成为自己独特的研究项目。这一研究计划的演变有三大趋势:概念和测量的完善、寻找最佳分析单位以及重新认识内战背景下的政治。这些趋势的交汇点--衡量标准、假设、单位和概念--往往会在内战领域中产生知识传统。作者将自己置身于这些传统之中,然后提出了这些基本趋势对未来研究的承诺和隐患。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Civil Wars
Civil Wars POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Clashing Legacies of EPLF Rebel Governance in Post-Independent Eritrea Farming to Fighting: How Shifting Agricultural Incomes Only Impact the Most Powerful Rebel Group Beans, Bullets and Bandages? Gendered and Racialised Othering in the Depiction of Military Support Work Child Responsive Conflict Early Warning: Prioritizing Children in Peace and Security Forced Fallow Fields: Making Meaningful Life in the Myanmar Spring Revolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1