Expanding the Coverage of Conflict Event Datasets: Three Proofs of Concept

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Civil Wars Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/13698249.2023.2254988
Andrew Shaver, Hannah Kazis-Taylor, Claudia Loomis, Mia Bartschi, Paul Patterson, Adrian Vera, Kevin Abad, Saher Alqarwani, Clay Bell, Sebastian Bock, Kieran Cabezas, Heidi Felix, Jennifer Gonzalez, Christopher Hoeft, Aileen Ibarra Martinez, Kai Keltner, Jessica Moroyoqui, Kieko Paman, Ethan Ramirez, Priscilla Reis, Juan Jose Rodriguez, Jazmin Santos-Perez, Katha Komal Sikka, Arjan Singh, Cassidy Tao, Richard Tirado, Aishvari Trivedi, Lillian Xu, Margaret You, Meriam Eskander
{"title":"Expanding the Coverage of Conflict Event Datasets: Three Proofs of Concept","authors":"Andrew Shaver, Hannah Kazis-Taylor, Claudia Loomis, Mia Bartschi, Paul Patterson, Adrian Vera, Kevin Abad, Saher Alqarwani, Clay Bell, Sebastian Bock, Kieran Cabezas, Heidi Felix, Jennifer Gonzalez, Christopher Hoeft, Aileen Ibarra Martinez, Kai Keltner, Jessica Moroyoqui, Kieko Paman, Ethan Ramirez, Priscilla Reis, Juan Jose Rodriguez, Jazmin Santos-Perez, Katha Komal Sikka, Arjan Singh, Cassidy Tao, Richard Tirado, Aishvari Trivedi, Lillian Xu, Margaret You, Meriam Eskander","doi":"10.1080/13698249.2023.2254988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many contemporary studies on political violence/social unrest rely on conflict event datasets derived primarily from major international/national news reports. Yet, a large body of research identifies systematic patterns of ‘missingness’ in these data, calling into question statistical results drawn from them. In this project, we explore three specific opportunities for additional data collection to help recover systematically excluded events and to potentially assist in addressing resulting bias. We find that all three approaches result in additional and often systematically different material than that reported in news-based datasets, and we reflect on the advantages and drawbacks of these approaches.","PeriodicalId":51785,"journal":{"name":"Civil Wars","volume":"34 1","pages":"367 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2023.2254988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many contemporary studies on political violence/social unrest rely on conflict event datasets derived primarily from major international/national news reports. Yet, a large body of research identifies systematic patterns of ‘missingness’ in these data, calling into question statistical results drawn from them. In this project, we explore three specific opportunities for additional data collection to help recover systematically excluded events and to potentially assist in addressing resulting bias. We find that all three approaches result in additional and often systematically different material than that reported in news-based datasets, and we reflect on the advantages and drawbacks of these approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩大冲突事件数据集的覆盖范围:三个概念验证
摘要 许多有关政治暴力/社会动乱的当代研究都依赖于主要来自主要国际/国家新闻报道的冲突事件数据集。然而,大量研究发现,这些数据中存在系统性的 "遗漏 "模式,从而对由此得出的统计结果提出了质疑。在本项目中,我们探讨了额外数据收集的三个具体机会,以帮助恢复被系统性排除的事件,并有可能帮助解决由此产生的偏差。我们发现,所有这三种方法都会产生额外的、往往与基于新闻的数据集所报道的内容存在系统性差异的材料,我们对这些方法的优点和缺点进行了反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Civil Wars
Civil Wars POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Clashing Legacies of EPLF Rebel Governance in Post-Independent Eritrea Farming to Fighting: How Shifting Agricultural Incomes Only Impact the Most Powerful Rebel Group Beans, Bullets and Bandages? Gendered and Racialised Othering in the Depiction of Military Support Work Child Responsive Conflict Early Warning: Prioritizing Children in Peace and Security Forced Fallow Fields: Making Meaningful Life in the Myanmar Spring Revolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1