Intrathecal atropine versus preoperative intravenous ondasetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting due to intrathecal morphine in perineal surgery

F. Soliman, Elhadad Mousa, Shehab Ahmed, Ahmed Hassan
{"title":"Intrathecal atropine versus preoperative intravenous ondasetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting due to intrathecal morphine in perineal surgery","authors":"F. Soliman, Elhadad Mousa, Shehab Ahmed, Ahmed Hassan","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_24_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Opioids are frequently added to neuroaxial local anesthetics (LAs). Intrathecal (IT) opioid is not devoid of adverse effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory depression, and pruritis. IT atropine also carries a significant antiemetic effect, and this can be a valuable modality for the prevention of IT opioid-related PONV. The antagonist of 5-HT3 receptors such as ondasetron which is usually used to decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting was considered for the prevention and treatment of neuroaxial opioid-induced (PONV). Method 100 cases of ASA I-II aged 18 and 45 who planned to do elective perineal surgery, and receiving bupivacaine spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group (A) cases received IT hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg 0.5%) in combination with morphine 250 μg and atropine sulphate 100 μg. Before anesthesia, group (B) participants received IT hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg 0.5%) and 250 μg of morphine and 4 mg IV ondansetron. Follow-up for PONV attacks, vital signs, and side effects in the two groups. Results The occurrence of postoperative nausea were 4 and 18% in group A and B, respectively (P value=0.049) while postoperative vomiting was 0 and 12% in group A and B, respectively (P value=0.027). The occurrence of sedation, mouth dryness, headache, and drowsiness were more in group A compared with group B. Conclusion IT atropine is more effective than IV ondasetron preoperative in relieving PONV related to IT morphine, sedation is the frequent side effect occurred in IT atropine, headache is the frequent side effect occurred in the ondasetron group","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_24_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Opioids are frequently added to neuroaxial local anesthetics (LAs). Intrathecal (IT) opioid is not devoid of adverse effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory depression, and pruritis. IT atropine also carries a significant antiemetic effect, and this can be a valuable modality for the prevention of IT opioid-related PONV. The antagonist of 5-HT3 receptors such as ondasetron which is usually used to decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting was considered for the prevention and treatment of neuroaxial opioid-induced (PONV). Method 100 cases of ASA I-II aged 18 and 45 who planned to do elective perineal surgery, and receiving bupivacaine spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group (A) cases received IT hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg 0.5%) in combination with morphine 250 μg and atropine sulphate 100 μg. Before anesthesia, group (B) participants received IT hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg 0.5%) and 250 μg of morphine and 4 mg IV ondansetron. Follow-up for PONV attacks, vital signs, and side effects in the two groups. Results The occurrence of postoperative nausea were 4 and 18% in group A and B, respectively (P value=0.049) while postoperative vomiting was 0 and 12% in group A and B, respectively (P value=0.027). The occurrence of sedation, mouth dryness, headache, and drowsiness were more in group A compared with group B. Conclusion IT atropine is more effective than IV ondasetron preoperative in relieving PONV related to IT morphine, sedation is the frequent side effect occurred in IT atropine, headache is the frequent side effect occurred in the ondasetron group
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞘内阿托品与术前静脉注射昂达司琼相比,可预防会阴手术中鞘内吗啡引起的术后恶心和呕吐
背景 阿片类药物经常被添加到神经轴局部麻醉剂(LAs)中。鞘内注射(IT)阿片类药物并非没有不良反应,如术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、呼吸抑制和瘙痒症。IT 阿托品也有明显的止吐作用,这可能是预防 IT 阿片相关 PONV 的一种重要方式。5-HT3受体拮抗剂如昂达司琼通常用于降低恶心和呕吐的发生率,我们考虑将其用于预防和治疗神经轴阿片类药物引起的(PONV)。方法 将 100 例年龄在 18-45 岁之间、计划进行会阴部择期手术并接受布比卡因脊髓麻醉的 ASA I-II 级患者随机分为两组。A组病例接受IT高压布比卡因(10 毫克 0.5%),同时使用吗啡 250 微克和硫酸阿托品 100 微克。在麻醉前,B 组参与者接受 IT 高压氧布比卡因(10 毫克 0.5%)、250 微克吗啡和 4 毫克静脉注射昂丹司琼。对两组患者的 PONV 发作、生命体征和副作用进行随访。结果 A 组和 B 组的术后恶心发生率分别为 4% 和 18%(P 值=0.049),而 A 组和 B 组的术后呕吐发生率分别为 0% 和 12%(P 值=0.027)。A 组与 B 组相比,镇静、口干、头痛和嗜睡的发生率更高。 结论 IT 阿托品比静脉注射昂达司琼更有效地缓解术前与 IT 吗啡相关的 PONV,镇静是 IT 阿托品组经常出现的副作用,头痛是昂达司琼组经常出现的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1