Autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of third-degree pressure ulcers; pilot randomized-controlled trial

Tamer Habib, A. Fayed, A. Deghady, Osama Maklad, Islam Ahmed
{"title":"Autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of third-degree pressure ulcers; pilot randomized-controlled trial","authors":"Tamer Habib, A. Fayed, A. Deghady, Osama Maklad, Islam Ahmed","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_19_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a mixture of cytokines, thrombocytes as well as multiple growth factors which are produced mainly by α-granules of platelets which enhance the process of natural healing process with less time. The role of autologous PRP in managing nonhealing pressure ulcers has been questioned as it enhances tissue healing by providing the necessary growth factors. Objectives Determining the relative efficacy of autologous PRP in treating grade III skin ulcers compared with standard care. Methods In this pilot randomized-controlled trial, 28 patients with grade III pressure ulcers in the critical care units of Alexandria Main University Hospital were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Patients of group A were subjected to PRP injections in the periphery of their pressure ulcers along with the standard care, while group B were subjected only to the standard care of pressure ulcers. Results PRP group showed significantly reduced mean ulcer volume at week 1 (18.88 vs. 21.42, P=0.047), week 2 (17.14 vs. 21.15, P=0.017), week 3 (14.92 vs. 19.99, P=0.020) and week 4 (10.68 vs. 17.35, P=0.019) than control group. PRP group showed significantly reduced mean ulcer surface area at week 1 (13.76 vs. 14.81, P=0.047), week 2 (10.64 vs. 14.11, P=0.032), week 3 (8.00 vs. 14.17, P=0.013) and week 4 (6.30 vs. 12.94, P=0.023) than control group. Conclusion Adding weekly autologous PRP injections to the standard care of noninfected grade III pressure ulcers may be a potentially effective approach. In critically ill patients, it was associated with reduced ulcer volumes, reduced ulcer surface areas, and better healing starting from the first week of injections.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_19_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a mixture of cytokines, thrombocytes as well as multiple growth factors which are produced mainly by α-granules of platelets which enhance the process of natural healing process with less time. The role of autologous PRP in managing nonhealing pressure ulcers has been questioned as it enhances tissue healing by providing the necessary growth factors. Objectives Determining the relative efficacy of autologous PRP in treating grade III skin ulcers compared with standard care. Methods In this pilot randomized-controlled trial, 28 patients with grade III pressure ulcers in the critical care units of Alexandria Main University Hospital were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Patients of group A were subjected to PRP injections in the periphery of their pressure ulcers along with the standard care, while group B were subjected only to the standard care of pressure ulcers. Results PRP group showed significantly reduced mean ulcer volume at week 1 (18.88 vs. 21.42, P=0.047), week 2 (17.14 vs. 21.15, P=0.017), week 3 (14.92 vs. 19.99, P=0.020) and week 4 (10.68 vs. 17.35, P=0.019) than control group. PRP group showed significantly reduced mean ulcer surface area at week 1 (13.76 vs. 14.81, P=0.047), week 2 (10.64 vs. 14.11, P=0.032), week 3 (8.00 vs. 14.17, P=0.013) and week 4 (6.30 vs. 12.94, P=0.023) than control group. Conclusion Adding weekly autologous PRP injections to the standard care of noninfected grade III pressure ulcers may be a potentially effective approach. In critically ill patients, it was associated with reduced ulcer volumes, reduced ulcer surface areas, and better healing starting from the first week of injections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗三度压疮的自体血小板丰富血浆;试点随机对照试验
背景 富血小板血浆(PRP)是一种细胞因子、血小板以及多种生长因子的混合物,主要由血小板的α-颗粒产生,可在较短时间内促进自然愈合过程。由于自体 PRP 可通过提供必要的生长因子促进组织愈合,因此它在治疗未愈合压疮中的作用受到了质疑。目标 与标准护理相比,确定自体 PRP 治疗 III 级皮肤溃疡的相对疗效。方法 在这项随机对照试验中,亚历山大主大学医院重症监护室的 28 名 III 级压疮患者被纳入试验并随机分为两组。A 组患者在接受标准护理的同时在压疮外围注射 PRP,而 B 组患者只接受压疮标准护理。结果 PRP 组在第 1 周(18.88 对 21.42,P=0.047)、第 2 周(17.14 对 21.15,P=0.017)、第 3 周(14.92 对 19.99,P=0.020)和第 4 周(10.68 对 17.35,P=0.019)的平均溃疡面积均比对照组明显减少。与对照组相比,PRP 组在第 1 周(13.76 vs. 14.81,P=0.047)、第 2 周(10.64 vs. 14.11,P=0.032)、第 3 周(8.00 vs. 14.17,P=0.013)和第 4 周(6.30 vs. 12.94,P=0.023)的平均溃疡表面积明显减少。结论 在治疗非感染性 III 级压疮的标准护理中加入每周一次的自体 PRP 注射可能是一种潜在的有效方法。在重症患者中,自注射第一周起,溃疡面积减少,溃疡表面积缩小,愈合情况改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1