Ranking blame

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic Theory Pub Date : 2024-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s00199-023-01547-4
{"title":"Ranking blame","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00199-023-01547-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>A social planner wants to rank people. Utilitarianism implies that a natural ranking which orders people from most to least sensitive to their rank is the best ranking. But people’s feelings toward the social planner, like blame or gratitude, can depend both on their assigned rank, and on the alternatives they might have been assigned. As a result, the social planner needs to do pairwise comparisons and there may not be a best ranking due to intransitive cycles. This paper shows the possibility of the coexistence of a best choice and non-transitivity. It illustrates how to tell when a best ranking exists, and that when it exists, it is indeed the natural ranking. When this best does not exist, an alternative second-best group ranking strategy is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47982,"journal":{"name":"Economic Theory","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-023-01547-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A social planner wants to rank people. Utilitarianism implies that a natural ranking which orders people from most to least sensitive to their rank is the best ranking. But people’s feelings toward the social planner, like blame or gratitude, can depend both on their assigned rank, and on the alternatives they might have been assigned. As a result, the social planner needs to do pairwise comparisons and there may not be a best ranking due to intransitive cycles. This paper shows the possibility of the coexistence of a best choice and non-transitivity. It illustrates how to tell when a best ranking exists, and that when it exists, it is indeed the natural ranking. When this best does not exist, an alternative second-best group ranking strategy is proposed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
排名指责
摘要 社会规划者希望对人们进行排序。功利主义认为,对人们的等级从最敏感到最不敏感进行排序的自然排序是最好的排序。但是,人们对社会规划者的感情,如责备或感激,可能既取决于他们被分配的等级,也取决于他们可能被分配的其他等级。因此,社会规划者需要进行配对比较,而且由于不等循环,可能没有最佳排名。本文展示了最佳选择和非传递性并存的可能性。它说明了如何判断最佳排序何时存在,以及当最佳排序存在时,它确实是自然排序。当最佳排序不存在时,本文提出了另一种次优分组排序策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Theory
Economic Theory ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of Economic Theory is to provide an outlet for research - in all areas of economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning, and - on specific topics in mathematics which is motivated by the analysis of economic problems. Economic Theory''s scope encompasses - but is not limited to - the following fields. - classical and modern equilibrium theory - cooperative and non-cooperative game theory - macroeconomics - social choice and welfare - uncertainty and information, intertemporal economics (including dynamical systems) - public economics - international and developmental economics - financial economics, money and banking - industrial organization Economic Theory also publishes surveys if they clearly picture the basic ideas at work in some areas, the essential technical apparatus which is used and the central questions which remain open. The development of a productive dialectic between stylized facts and abstract formulations requires that economic relevance be at the forefront. Thus, correct, and innovative, mathematical analysis is not enough; it must be motivated by - and contribute to - the understanding of substantive economic problems. Officially cited as: Econ Theory
期刊最新文献
Information design for weighted voting Beyond Hawks and Doves: Can inequality ease coordination? Everybody’s talkin’ at me: levels of majority language acquisition by minority language speakers Central bank communication and stabilization policies under firms’ motivated beliefs Transfers in climate action teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1