New framework reveals gaps in US ocean biodiversity protection

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES One Earth Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.014
Sarah A. Gignoux-Wolfsohn, Daniel C. Dunn, Jesse Cleary, Patrick N. Halpin, Clarissa R. Anderson, Nicholas J. Bax, Gabrielle Canonico, Peter Chaniotis, Sarah DeLand, Mimi Diorio, Steven D. Gaines, Kirsten Grorud-Colvert, David E. Johnson, Lisa A. Levin, Carolyn J. Lundquist, Eleonora Manca, Anna Metaxas, Mark E. Monaco, Lance Morgan, Peter J. Mumby, J. Emmett Duffy
{"title":"New framework reveals gaps in US ocean biodiversity protection","authors":"Sarah A. Gignoux-Wolfsohn, Daniel C. Dunn, Jesse Cleary, Patrick N. Halpin, Clarissa R. Anderson, Nicholas J. Bax, Gabrielle Canonico, Peter Chaniotis, Sarah DeLand, Mimi Diorio, Steven D. Gaines, Kirsten Grorud-Colvert, David E. Johnson, Lisa A. Levin, Carolyn J. Lundquist, Eleonora Manca, Anna Metaxas, Mark E. Monaco, Lance Morgan, Peter J. Mumby, J. Emmett Duffy","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human activities threaten Earth’s biodiversity and its contributions to human well-being. In the ocean, our poor understanding of how biodiversity is distributed limits its management and protection, necessitating reliance on weak abiotic proxies. Here, we propose a scientific framework for assessing marine biodiversity at multiple spatial scales, which exposes gaps in biodiversity knowledge and protection. The framework prioritizes ecologically and societally important taxa, characteristics of effective networks, and existing data. Applying the framework to assess biodiversity inside and outside US marine protected areas, we reveal that these areas contain a fraction of the biodiversity found in US waters. We show that none of the nation’s 24 marine ecoregions meet all criteria for an effective protection network and that biodiversity coverage in protected areas varies among regions and taxa. This marine biodiversity assessment highlights concrete recommendations for more strategic protection and validates a scientific framework generalizable to other spatial management uses.</p>","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human activities threaten Earth’s biodiversity and its contributions to human well-being. In the ocean, our poor understanding of how biodiversity is distributed limits its management and protection, necessitating reliance on weak abiotic proxies. Here, we propose a scientific framework for assessing marine biodiversity at multiple spatial scales, which exposes gaps in biodiversity knowledge and protection. The framework prioritizes ecologically and societally important taxa, characteristics of effective networks, and existing data. Applying the framework to assess biodiversity inside and outside US marine protected areas, we reveal that these areas contain a fraction of the biodiversity found in US waters. We show that none of the nation’s 24 marine ecoregions meet all criteria for an effective protection network and that biodiversity coverage in protected areas varies among regions and taxa. This marine biodiversity assessment highlights concrete recommendations for more strategic protection and validates a scientific framework generalizable to other spatial management uses.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新框架揭示美国海洋生物多样性保护的差距
人类活动威胁着地球的生物多样性及其对人类福祉的贡献。在海洋中,我们对生物多样性的分布情况了解甚少,这限制了对生物多样性的管理和保护,使我们不得不依赖于薄弱的非生物代用指标。在此,我们提出了一个在多个空间尺度上评估海洋生物多样性的科学框架,该框架揭示了生物多样性知识和保护方面的差距。该框架优先考虑具有生态和社会重要性的类群、有效网络的特征以及现有数据。应用该框架评估美国海洋保护区内外的生物多样性时,我们发现这些保护区的生物多样性仅占美国水域生物多样性的一小部分。我们表明,美国的 24 个海洋生态区域中没有一个符合有效保护网络的所有标准,保护区的生物多样性覆盖范围因区域和分类群而异。这项海洋生物多样性评估强调了更具战略性保护的具体建议,并验证了一个可推广到其他空间管理用途的科学框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
期刊最新文献
China's carbon-neutral policies will reduce short-term PM2.5-associated excess incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Generating affordable protection of high seas biodiversity through cross-sectoral spatial planning New framework reveals gaps in US ocean biodiversity protection FinTech for environmental sustainability: Promises and pitfalls Policy documents considering biodiversity, land use, and climate in the European Arctic reveal visible, hidden, and imagined nexus approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1