The added worker effect: evidence from a disability insurance reform

IF 4.1 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Review of Economics of the Household Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s11150-023-09692-4
Mario Bernasconi, Tunga Kantarcı, Arthur van Soest, Jan-Maarten van Sonsbeek
{"title":"The added worker effect: evidence from a disability insurance reform","authors":"Mario Bernasconi, Tunga Kantarcı, Arthur van Soest, Jan-Maarten van Sonsbeek","doi":"10.1007/s11150-023-09692-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Netherlands reformed its disability insurance (DI) scheme in 2006. Reintegration incentives for employers became stronger, access to DI benefits became more difficult, and benefits became less generous. Using administrative data on all individuals who fell sick shortly before and after the reform, we study the impact of the reform on labor participation of individuals who fell sick and their spouses. Difference-in-differences estimates show, among other things, that the reform led to an increase of labor participation of the individuals who fell sick only if these individuals had a permanent job, whereas spouses responded to the DI reform in other cases, where the individuals reporting sick had a temporary job or were unemployed. More generally, the spouses respond when the sick individual’s labor market position is weak and the individual him- or herself has trouble finding or retaining employment. The effects are persistent during the 10 years after the reform. The effect on the spouse can be seen as an “added worker effect,” where additional earnings of the spouse compensate for the sick individual’s income loss so that both partners share the burden of a more stringent DI scheme. Comparing individuals reporting sick with and without partner provides further support for the notion that the responses of couples to the reform are joint decisions of the two partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":47111,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economics of the Household","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economics of the Household","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-023-09692-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Netherlands reformed its disability insurance (DI) scheme in 2006. Reintegration incentives for employers became stronger, access to DI benefits became more difficult, and benefits became less generous. Using administrative data on all individuals who fell sick shortly before and after the reform, we study the impact of the reform on labor participation of individuals who fell sick and their spouses. Difference-in-differences estimates show, among other things, that the reform led to an increase of labor participation of the individuals who fell sick only if these individuals had a permanent job, whereas spouses responded to the DI reform in other cases, where the individuals reporting sick had a temporary job or were unemployed. More generally, the spouses respond when the sick individual’s labor market position is weak and the individual him- or herself has trouble finding or retaining employment. The effects are persistent during the 10 years after the reform. The effect on the spouse can be seen as an “added worker effect,” where additional earnings of the spouse compensate for the sick individual’s income loss so that both partners share the burden of a more stringent DI scheme. Comparing individuals reporting sick with and without partner provides further support for the notion that the responses of couples to the reform are joint decisions of the two partners.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新增工人效应:来自伤残保险改革的证据
荷兰于 2006 年对其残疾保险计划进行了改革。雇主的重返社会激励措施变得更强,获得 DI 福利变得更加困难,福利也变得不那么慷慨。利用改革前后不久所有患病者的行政数据,我们研究了改革对患病者及其配偶劳动参与的影响。差异估计结果表明,只有在生病的人有长期工作的情况下,改革才会增加这些人的劳动参与,而在其他情况下,即报告生病的人有临时工作或失业时,配偶才会对 DI 改革做出反应。更一般地说,当患病者的劳动力市场地位较弱,而患病者本人又难以找到或保留工作时,配偶就会做出反应。这种影响在改革后的 10 年中持续存在。对配偶的影响可以看作是 "额外工人效应",即配偶的额外收入弥补了患病者的收入损失,从而使夫妻双方共同分担了更严格的 DI 计划的负担。对有伴侣和无伴侣的患病者进行比较,进一步证明了夫妻双方对改革的反应是由双方共同决定的这一观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Review of Economics of the Household publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical research on the economic behavior and decision-making processes of single and multi-person households. The Review is not wedded to any particular models or methods. It welcomes both macro-economic and micro-level applications. Household decisions analyzed in this journal include ·         household production of human capital, health, nutrition/food, childcare, and eldercare, ·         well-being of persons living in households, issues of gender and power, ·         fertility and risky behaviors, ·         consumption, savings and wealth accumulation, ·         labor force participation and time use,·         household formation (including marriage, cohabitation and fertility) and dissolution,·         migration, intergenerational transfers,·         experiments involving households,·         religiosity and civility.The journal is particularly interested in policy-relevant economic analyses and equally interested in applications to countries at various levels of economic development. The Perspectives section covers articles on the history of economic thought and review articles. Officially cited as: Rev Econ Household
期刊最新文献
The heterogeneous effects of the first childbirth on women’s income Parental labor market penalties during two years of COVID-19 Commuting in dual-earner households: international gender differences with time use surveys Unemployment insurance generosity and intimate partner violence Bank Accounts for Minors: A Pathway to Financial Inclusion or a Dead-End?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1