Relationship between steroid use and superinfections in SARS-CoV-2 patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q1 Environmental Science Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Pub Date : 2023-11-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20008686.2023.2277000
Melissa González Ramírez, Jaime Andrés Hoyos Muñoz, Germán Alberto Moreno Gómez, Mateo Aguirre Flórez, José Fernando Gómez González
{"title":"Relationship between steroid use and superinfections in SARS-CoV-2 patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Melissa González Ramírez, Jaime Andrés Hoyos Muñoz, Germán Alberto Moreno Gómez, Mateo Aguirre Flórez, José Fernando Gómez González","doi":"10.1080/20008686.2023.2277000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The use of steroids has been proposed as a pharmacological approach to treat the SARS-CoV-2 infection to improve outcomes. However, there are doubts about safety against the development of superinfections and their worse outcomes. <b>Objective:</b> To establish the relative frequency of superinfection associated with using steroids in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. <b>Materials and methods:</b> We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis using PRISMA standards in 5 databases (PubMed/Scopus/Cochrane/EMBASE/Google Scholar). The search was carried out between February 2020 and May 2023. The search terms were 'steroids' or 'superinfection' 'and' followed by 'SARS-CoV-2' or 'COVID-19'. <b>Results:</b> We found 77 studies, but only 10 with 3539 patients were included in the systematic review. All patients developed severe disease. The documented OR for superinfection through the meta-analysis was 1.437 (95% IC 0.869-2.378) with a p-value of 0.158 without showing a risk attributed to steroids and the development of superinfections. In the Funnel-plot analysis, no publication biases were found. <b>Conclusion:</b> No relationship was found between using steroids and superinfection in patients with SARS-CoV-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":37446,"journal":{"name":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"2277000"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10769522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2023.2277000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of steroids has been proposed as a pharmacological approach to treat the SARS-CoV-2 infection to improve outcomes. However, there are doubts about safety against the development of superinfections and their worse outcomes. Objective: To establish the relative frequency of superinfection associated with using steroids in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis using PRISMA standards in 5 databases (PubMed/Scopus/Cochrane/EMBASE/Google Scholar). The search was carried out between February 2020 and May 2023. The search terms were 'steroids' or 'superinfection' 'and' followed by 'SARS-CoV-2' or 'COVID-19'. Results: We found 77 studies, but only 10 with 3539 patients were included in the systematic review. All patients developed severe disease. The documented OR for superinfection through the meta-analysis was 1.437 (95% IC 0.869-2.378) with a p-value of 0.158 without showing a risk attributed to steroids and the development of superinfections. In the Funnel-plot analysis, no publication biases were found. Conclusion: No relationship was found between using steroids and superinfection in patients with SARS-CoV-2.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用类固醇与 SARS-CoV-2 患者超级感染之间的关系。系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言有人建议使用类固醇作为治疗 SARS-CoV-2 感染的药物方法,以改善疗效。然而,人们对使用类固醇治疗的安全性存在疑虑,因为类固醇会导致超级感染的发生,并使治疗效果更差。研究目的确定在 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者中使用类固醇与超级感染相关的相对频率。材料和方法我们采用 PRISMA 标准在 5 个数据库(PubMed/Scopus/Cochrane/EMBASE/Google Scholar)中进行了系统性文献综述和荟萃分析。检索时间为 2020 年 2 月至 2023 年 5 月。检索词为 "类固醇 "或 "超级感染""和",后加 "SARS-CoV-2 "或 "COVID-19"。结果:我们发现了 77 项研究,但只有 10 项研究的 3539 名患者被纳入系统综述。所有患者均出现严重疾病。通过荟萃分析,超级感染的OR值为1.437(95% IC 0.869-2.378),P值为0.158,未显示类固醇与超级感染发生的风险。在漏斗图分析中,没有发现发表偏差。结论在 SARS-CoV-2 患者中未发现使用类固醇与超级感染之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Ecology & Epidemiology aims to stimulate inter-disciplinary collaborations dealing with a range of subjects, from the plethora of zoonotic infections in humans, over diseases with implication in wildlife ecology, to advanced virology and bacteriology. The journal specifically welcomes papers from studies where researchers from multiple medical and ecological disciplines are collaborating so as to increase our knowledge of the emergence, spread and effect of new and re-emerged infectious diseases in humans, domestic animals and wildlife. Main areas of interest include, but are not limited to: 1.Zoonotic microbioorganisms 2.Vector borne infections 3.Gastrointestinal pathogens 4.Antimicrobial resistance 5.Zoonotic microbioorganisms in changing environment
期刊最新文献
Climate change and contagion: the emerging threat of zoonotic diseases in Africa. Assessment of Hepatitis E virus transmission risks: a comprehensive review of cases among blood transfusion recipients and blood donors. Untangling the role of environmental and host-related determinants for on-farm transmission of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157. Literature review on micro-organisms from domestic goats potentially causing human pneumonia. Global stability analysis and modelling onchocerciasis transmission dynamics with control measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1