Does F-18 FDG-PET/CT Have an Additional Impact on Axillary Approach in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?

IF 1.3 Q4 ONCOLOGY European journal of breast health Pub Date : 2023-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-10-6
Burak Çelik, Medine Boge, Ece Dilege
{"title":"Does F-18 FDG-PET/CT Have an Additional Impact on Axillary Approach in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?","authors":"Burak Çelik, Medine Boge, Ece Dilege","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-10-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Breast cancer (BC) is a significant health concern and one of the most diagnosed cancers in women, both in Turkey and globally. Despite advances in the management of BC, axillary lymph node involvement remains a significant consideration for treatment planning, local recurrence, and prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG-PET/CT) in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis compared to ultrasound (US).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty patients who were diagnosed with stage I and II BC and underwent US and F-18 FDG-PET/CT scans before surgery were enrolled in this study. Those who did not undergo F-18 FDG-PET/CT imaging, patients with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis and patients with micrometastases in the axilla were excluded from the analysis. Imaging results of the status of axillary lymph nodes were verified with the final pathology report of axillary lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of F-18 FDG-PET/CT for the detection of ipsilateral axillary lymph node metastases were 75%, 77.27%, 72.97%, 79.07%, and 76.25%. The corresponding values for US were 72.22%, 81.82%, 76.47%, 78.26%, and 77.50%, respectively. When US finding is negative or suspicious in axillary lymph node evaluation, the accuracy of F-18 FDG-PET/CT for the detection of ipsilateral axillary lymph node metastases were 65.38%, 83.33%, 70.83%, and 79.55%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that F-18 FDG-PET/CT does not provide an additional advantage over US in assessing the axilla in early-stage disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":"20 1","pages":"45-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10765458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-10-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Breast cancer (BC) is a significant health concern and one of the most diagnosed cancers in women, both in Turkey and globally. Despite advances in the management of BC, axillary lymph node involvement remains a significant consideration for treatment planning, local recurrence, and prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG-PET/CT) in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis compared to ultrasound (US).

Materials and methods: Eighty patients who were diagnosed with stage I and II BC and underwent US and F-18 FDG-PET/CT scans before surgery were enrolled in this study. Those who did not undergo F-18 FDG-PET/CT imaging, patients with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis and patients with micrometastases in the axilla were excluded from the analysis. Imaging results of the status of axillary lymph nodes were verified with the final pathology report of axillary lymph nodes.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of F-18 FDG-PET/CT for the detection of ipsilateral axillary lymph node metastases were 75%, 77.27%, 72.97%, 79.07%, and 76.25%. The corresponding values for US were 72.22%, 81.82%, 76.47%, 78.26%, and 77.50%, respectively. When US finding is negative or suspicious in axillary lymph node evaluation, the accuracy of F-18 FDG-PET/CT for the detection of ipsilateral axillary lymph node metastases were 65.38%, 83.33%, 70.83%, and 79.55%, respectively.

Conclusion: This study found that F-18 FDG-PET/CT does not provide an additional advantage over US in assessing the axilla in early-stage disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
F-18 FDG-PET/CT 对早期乳腺癌的腋窝入路是否有额外影响?
目的:乳腺癌(BC)是一个重大的健康问题,也是土耳其和全球女性确诊率最高的癌症之一。尽管乳腺癌的治疗取得了进展,但腋窝淋巴结受累仍是治疗计划、局部复发和预后的重要考虑因素。我们旨在评估 F-18 氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(F-18 FDG-PET/CT)与超声波(US)相比在检测腋窝淋巴结转移方面的贡献:80名确诊为I期和II期BC的患者在手术前接受了US和F-18 FDG-PET/CT扫描。未接受 F-18 FDG-PET/CT 扫描的患者、确诊时有远处转移的患者和腋窝有微转移的患者不在分析范围内。腋窝淋巴结状态的成像结果与腋窝淋巴结的最终病理报告进行了核实:F-18 FDG-PET/CT 检测同侧腋窝淋巴结转移的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为 75%、77.27%、72.97%、79.07% 和 76.25%。而 US 的相应数值分别为 72.22%、81.82%、76.47%、78.26% 和 77.50%。当 US 发现腋窝淋巴结评估为阴性或可疑时,F-18 FDG-PET/CT 检测同侧腋窝淋巴结转移的准确率分别为 65.38%、83.33%、70.83% 和 79.55%:本研究发现,F-18 FDG-PET/CT 在评估早期腋窝淋巴结转移方面并不比 US 更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying the SOUND Trial for Omitting Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in Bahrain. Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Before and After Breast-Cancer Diagnosis Among Young Women in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Dietary Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk: A KCPS-II Cohort Study. Effect of Flaxseed on Pain Relief and Quality of Life in Patients With Mastalgia: A Single Arm Interventional Study. Mastalgia and Why It Should Be Evaluated With Imaging in Areas Where Use of Breast Cancer Screening Services are Unsatisfactory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1