Potential Usefulness a Coronal View using an Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Detecting Breast Lesions.

IF 1.3 Q4 ONCOLOGY European journal of breast health Pub Date : 2023-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-11-6
Megumi Suzuki, Ryohei Nakayama, Kiyoshi Namba, Hiroyuki Kawami, Mayumi Nara, Seigo Nakamura
{"title":"Potential Usefulness a Coronal View using an Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Detecting Breast Lesions.","authors":"Megumi Suzuki, Ryohei Nakayama, Kiyoshi Namba, Hiroyuki Kawami, Mayumi Nara, Seigo Nakamura","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-11-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>An automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) combined with screening mammography has increased cancer detection rates; however, supplemental ABUS use has increased recall rates. In this study, we aimed to identify an accurate and efficient method of ABUS interpretation and evaluate the potential usefulness of its coronal view versus the conventional transverse view.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective observer study included comprised 114 ABUS cases (40 normal, 35 benign, 39 malignant). Ten physicians from multiple institutions interpreted the anonymized coronal and transverse views independently. The observers scored their confidence in the lesion detection for each case using a continuous scale and recorded reading times for each coronal and transverse view interpretation. Free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to compare detection accuracies between views; a paired t-test was used to compare the average reading times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Detection accuracy did not differ significantly between the coronal and transverse views (figure of merit=0.740 and 0.745, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.72). However, the average reading time for the coronal view was significantly shorter than that for the transverse view (149.7 <i>vs.</i> 200.3 seconds per case, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The coronal view obtained with the ABUS was useful for interpretation and associated with significantly shorter reading times compared with the conventional transverse view while maintaining breast lesion detection accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10765468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-11-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: An automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) combined with screening mammography has increased cancer detection rates; however, supplemental ABUS use has increased recall rates. In this study, we aimed to identify an accurate and efficient method of ABUS interpretation and evaluate the potential usefulness of its coronal view versus the conventional transverse view.

Materials and methods: This retrospective observer study included comprised 114 ABUS cases (40 normal, 35 benign, 39 malignant). Ten physicians from multiple institutions interpreted the anonymized coronal and transverse views independently. The observers scored their confidence in the lesion detection for each case using a continuous scale and recorded reading times for each coronal and transverse view interpretation. Free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to compare detection accuracies between views; a paired t-test was used to compare the average reading times.

Results: Detection accuracy did not differ significantly between the coronal and transverse views (figure of merit=0.740 and 0.745, respectively; p = 0.72). However, the average reading time for the coronal view was significantly shorter than that for the transverse view (149.7 vs. 200.3 seconds per case, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: The coronal view obtained with the ABUS was useful for interpretation and associated with significantly shorter reading times compared with the conventional transverse view while maintaining breast lesion detection accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用自动乳腺超声系统的冠状视图检测乳腺病变的潜在用途。
目的:自动乳腺超声系统(ABUS)与乳腺放射摄影筛查的结合提高了癌症检出率;然而,辅助使用 ABUS 增加了召回率。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定一种准确、高效的 ABUS 解释方法,并评估其冠状视图与传统横向视图的潜在实用性:这项回顾性观察研究包括 114 例 ABUS 病例(40 例正常、35 例良性、39 例恶性)。来自多个机构的 10 名医生对匿名冠状切面和横切面进行了独立解读。观察员使用连续量表对每个病例的病变检测信心进行评分,并记录每个冠状切面和横切面解读的阅读时间。采用自由响应接收器操作特征分析比较不同切面的检测准确性;采用配对 t 检验比较平均阅读时间:结果:冠状切面和横切面的检测准确率没有明显差异(优劣值分别为 0.740 和 0.745;P = 0.72)。然而,冠状视图的平均阅读时间明显短于横向视图(每例 149.7 秒对 200.3 秒,p = 0.003):结论:在保持乳腺病变检测准确性的前提下,使用 ABUS 获得的冠状切面有助于解读,与传统的横向切面相比,冠状切面的阅读时间明显更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Breast Health Promotion Intervention Among Catholic Nuns in Lake Zone 'Tanzania. Turmeric Inhibits MDA-MB-231 Cancer Cell Proliferation, Altering miR-638-5p and Its Potential Targets. The Relationship of Pathological Response and Visceral Muscle and Fat Volume in Women With Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Histopathological Features Predicting Neuroendocrine Morphology in Primary Breast Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis. Radiomics Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI for Optimized Modelling of Virtual Prognostic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1