The neural correlates of embodied L2 learning: Does embodied L2 verb learning affect representation and retention?

IF 3.6 Q1 LINGUISTICS Neurobiology of Language Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1162/nol_a_00132
Ana Zappa, Deirdre Bolger, Jean-Marie Pergandi, Raphael Fargier, Daniel Mestre, Cheryl Frenck-Mestre
{"title":"The neural correlates of embodied L2 learning: Does embodied L2 verb\n learning affect representation and retention?","authors":"Ana Zappa, Deirdre Bolger, Jean-Marie Pergandi, Raphael Fargier, Daniel Mestre, Cheryl Frenck-Mestre","doi":"10.1162/nol_a_00132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We investigated how naturalistic actions in a highly immersive, multimodal, interactive 3D virtual reality (VR) environment may enhance word encoding by recording EEG in a pre/post-test learning paradigm. While behavior data has shown that coupling word encoding with gestures congruent with word meaning enhances learning, the neural underpinnings of this effect have yet to be elucidated. We coupled EEG recording with VR to examine whether “embodied learning” improves learning and creates linguistic representations that produce greater motor resonance. Participants learned action verbs in an L2 in two different conditions: Specific action (observing and performing congruent actions on virtual objects) and Pointing (observing actions and pointing to virtual objects). Pre and post-training participants performed a Match-mismatch task as we measured EEG (variation in the N400 response as a function of match between observed actions and auditory verbs) and a Passive listening task while we measured motor activation (mu (8-13 Hz) and beta band (13-30Hz) desynchronization during auditory verb processing) during verb processing. Contrary to our expectations, post-training results revealed neither semantic nor motor effects in either group when considered independently of learning success. Behavioral results showed a great deal of variability in learning success. When considering performance, Low performance learners showed no semantic effect and High performance learners exhibited an N400 effect for Mismatch vs Match trails post-training, independent of the type of learning. Taken as a whole, our results suggest that embodied processes can play an important role in L2 learning.","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"52 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated how naturalistic actions in a highly immersive, multimodal, interactive 3D virtual reality (VR) environment may enhance word encoding by recording EEG in a pre/post-test learning paradigm. While behavior data has shown that coupling word encoding with gestures congruent with word meaning enhances learning, the neural underpinnings of this effect have yet to be elucidated. We coupled EEG recording with VR to examine whether “embodied learning” improves learning and creates linguistic representations that produce greater motor resonance. Participants learned action verbs in an L2 in two different conditions: Specific action (observing and performing congruent actions on virtual objects) and Pointing (observing actions and pointing to virtual objects). Pre and post-training participants performed a Match-mismatch task as we measured EEG (variation in the N400 response as a function of match between observed actions and auditory verbs) and a Passive listening task while we measured motor activation (mu (8-13 Hz) and beta band (13-30Hz) desynchronization during auditory verb processing) during verb processing. Contrary to our expectations, post-training results revealed neither semantic nor motor effects in either group when considered independently of learning success. Behavioral results showed a great deal of variability in learning success. When considering performance, Low performance learners showed no semantic effect and High performance learners exhibited an N400 effect for Mismatch vs Match trails post-training, independent of the type of learning. Taken as a whole, our results suggest that embodied processes can play an important role in L2 learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体现式 L2 学习的神经相关性:具身的 L2 动词学习会影响表征和保持吗?
我们研究了在高度沉浸式、多模态、交互式三维虚拟现实(VR)环境中的自然动作如何通过记录脑电图在测试前/测试后学习范式中增强单词编码。虽然行为数据显示,将单词编码与与单词含义一致的手势结合起来能增强学习效果,但这种效果的神经基础尚未阐明。我们将脑电图记录与虚拟现实技术相结合,研究 "体现式学习 "是否能提高学习效果,并创造出能产生更大运动共鸣的语言表征。参与者在两种不同的条件下学习 L2 中的动作动词:具体动作(观察虚拟物体并对其做出一致的动作)和指向(观察动作并指向虚拟物体)。训练前和训练后,参与者进行了匹配-不匹配任务,我们测量了脑电图(N400 反应的变化作为观察到的动作和听觉动词之间匹配的函数)和被动倾听任务,我们测量了动词处理过程中的运动激活(听觉动词处理过程中的μ(8-13 Hz)和β波段(13-30Hz)不同步)。与我们的预期相反,训练后的结果表明,与学习成功与否无关的情况下,这两组人既没有语义上的影响,也没有运动上的影响。行为结果显示,学习成功与否存在很大差异。在考虑学习成绩时,低成绩学习者没有表现出语义效应,而高成绩学习者则在训练后表现出不匹配与匹配轨迹的N400效应,这与学习类型无关。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,体现过程在语言学习中可以发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Language
Neurobiology of Language Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Domain-Specific Neural Basis of Auditory Statistical Learning in 5-7-Year-Old Children. Lexical Surprisal Shapes the Time Course of Syntactic Structure Building. A Comparison of Denoising Approaches for Spoken Word Production Related Artefacts in Continuous Multiband fMRI Data. Neural Mechanisms of Learning and Consolidation of Morphologically Derived Words in a Novel Language: Evidence From Hebrew Speakers. Language and the Cerebellum: Structural Connectivity to the Eloquent Brain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1