Lighting fires: On creating large group dialogue in organizations and society [CLGD]

Teresa von Sommaruga Howard
{"title":"Lighting fires: On creating large group dialogue in organizations and society [CLGD]","authors":"Teresa von Sommaruga Howard","doi":"10.1177/05333164231218920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the process of designing, setting up and conducting a pioneering series of workshops to introduce Patrick de Maré’s thinking and practice, often referred to as the ‘Large Group Course’. Although described in this way, the pattern of lectures, seminars and supervision alongside either therapy or experiential groups, in discrete sessions, usually associated with group analytic training is not followed. Instead, the workshops are conducted entirely as a Median Group in various forms including a seminar, two group consultations and several experiential sessions with the addition of two sessions of social dreaming each weekend. As the learning is intended to be experiential, apart from an extensive reading list, the curriculum is not specified in advance and there is a very limited didactic component. The ‘course’ was designed with the ‘Matching Principle’ in mind: an approach I encountered and worked with on the MA in Therapeutic Child Care at the University of Reading, (Ward, 1998:77). Elements of practice are imported by participants, to reduce the usual gap between training and practice so that the role of the unconscious is more directly brought to light. As the intention is to encourage ‘outsight’ into the socio-cultural forces that have invisibly shaped us, as opposed to insight (de Maré, 2012: 129), participants are given the opportunity to embody connections between their personal experience and the socio-political context as a step towards visualizing and working experientially with the social processes they encounter every day: the ‘Larger Group in the mind’. Always implicit in the work of the Larger Group is learning to notice and reveal hidden discourses, the voices of those with usually excluded histories: ‘subalterns’ or the indigenous and dispossessed in society, particularly people from or in colonized societies, who are excluded through hegemonic structures (Spivak, 1988). This is a key element of the work that needs to be experienced to be understood. As people join from across the world from many backgrounds and cultures, the inevitability of being faced with completely different perspectives and world views challenge those of us from the western world to question our privilege and thinking.","PeriodicalId":166668,"journal":{"name":"Group Analysis","volume":"58 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05333164231218920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the process of designing, setting up and conducting a pioneering series of workshops to introduce Patrick de Maré’s thinking and practice, often referred to as the ‘Large Group Course’. Although described in this way, the pattern of lectures, seminars and supervision alongside either therapy or experiential groups, in discrete sessions, usually associated with group analytic training is not followed. Instead, the workshops are conducted entirely as a Median Group in various forms including a seminar, two group consultations and several experiential sessions with the addition of two sessions of social dreaming each weekend. As the learning is intended to be experiential, apart from an extensive reading list, the curriculum is not specified in advance and there is a very limited didactic component. The ‘course’ was designed with the ‘Matching Principle’ in mind: an approach I encountered and worked with on the MA in Therapeutic Child Care at the University of Reading, (Ward, 1998:77). Elements of practice are imported by participants, to reduce the usual gap between training and practice so that the role of the unconscious is more directly brought to light. As the intention is to encourage ‘outsight’ into the socio-cultural forces that have invisibly shaped us, as opposed to insight (de Maré, 2012: 129), participants are given the opportunity to embody connections between their personal experience and the socio-political context as a step towards visualizing and working experientially with the social processes they encounter every day: the ‘Larger Group in the mind’. Always implicit in the work of the Larger Group is learning to notice and reveal hidden discourses, the voices of those with usually excluded histories: ‘subalterns’ or the indigenous and dispossessed in society, particularly people from or in colonized societies, who are excluded through hegemonic structures (Spivak, 1988). This is a key element of the work that needs to be experienced to be understood. As people join from across the world from many backgrounds and cultures, the inevitability of being faced with completely different perspectives and world views challenge those of us from the western world to question our privilege and thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
点燃火焰:关于在组织和社会中开展大型小组对话 [CLGD]
本文介绍了帕特里克-德-马雷(Patrick de Maré)为介绍其思想和实践而设计、建立和举办的一系列开创性工作坊的过程,这些工作坊通常被称为 "大型小组课程"。虽然是这样描述的,但我们并没有遵循通常与团体分析培训相关的讲座、研讨会和督导,以及治疗或体验式团体的模式。取而代之的是,研修班完全以中级小组的形式进行,包括一次研讨会、两次小组咨询和几次体验课程,每个周末还有两次社会梦幻课程。由于学习的目的是体验,因此除了大量的阅读书目之外,课程并没有事先规定,授课内容也非常有限。该 "课程 "的设计考虑到了 "匹配原则":这是我在雷丁大学的儿童治疗护理硕士课程中遇到并采用的一种方法(Ward,1998:77)。实践元素由参与者引入,以缩小培训与实践之间的通常差距,从而更直接地揭示无意识的作用。培训的目的是鼓励学员 "洞察 "那些在无形中塑造了我们的社会文化力量,而不是 "洞察"(de Maré, 2012: 129),因此,学员有机会体现个人经历与社会政治背景之间的联系,以此作为将他们每天遇到的社会进程可视化并与之进行经验性合作的一个步骤:"头脑中的大群体"。在 "大群体 "的工作中,始终隐含着学会注意和揭示隐藏的话语,以及那些通常被排斥在历史之外的人的声音:"次等人 "或社会中的原住民和被剥夺者,特别是来自殖民地社会或在殖民地社会中的人,他们被霸权结构排斥在外(斯皮瓦克,1988 年)。这是工作的一个关键因素,需要亲身经历才能理解。随着来自世界各地、具有不同背景和文化的人们的加入,不可避免地要面对完全不同的观点和世界观,这对我们这些来自西方世界的人提出了挑战,质疑我们的特权和思维方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Looking beyond ‘couple’: Exploring the relationship between co-conductors facilitating experiential groups for psychodynamic psychotherapy students Working on the future of group analysis — the future of the past Working on the future of group analysis – scientific exploration of efficacy, concepts, and neurobiological connections Group polyphony and sexuality Group polyphony and sexuality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1