A rubric for pre-service teachers to evaluate meaningful physical education

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Frontiers in Education Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.3389/feduc.2023.1324349
Dolors Cañabate, Remigijus Bubnys, Esther Hernández, Jordi Colomer
{"title":"A rubric for pre-service teachers to evaluate meaningful physical education","authors":"Dolors Cañabate, Remigijus Bubnys, Esther Hernández, Jordi Colomer","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2023.1324349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This manuscript presents the definition, implementation, and validation of a new rubric for assessing and improving meaningful physical education activities in tertiary education: the Rubric for Meaningful Physical Education Assessment (MEANPE). We present the rubric's validation based on twelve international external experts' appraisals, and on the perception of 250+ pre-service teachers (PST). The manuscript presents the validity, correspondence, formulation and appropriateness of the indicators and their levels. We found that there are statistically significant differences in student scores between the pre- and post-implementation, suggesting that the MEANPE rubric is a valid and reliable instrument with which to assess meaningful physical activities in primary school classes.","PeriodicalId":52290,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"53 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1324349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This manuscript presents the definition, implementation, and validation of a new rubric for assessing and improving meaningful physical education activities in tertiary education: the Rubric for Meaningful Physical Education Assessment (MEANPE). We present the rubric's validation based on twelve international external experts' appraisals, and on the perception of 250+ pre-service teachers (PST). The manuscript presents the validity, correspondence, formulation and appropriateness of the indicators and their levels. We found that there are statistically significant differences in student scores between the pre- and post-implementation, suggesting that the MEANPE rubric is a valid and reliable instrument with which to assess meaningful physical activities in primary school classes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供职前教师评价有意义的体育教育的评分标准
本手稿介绍了用于评估和改进高等教育中有意义体育活动的新标准:有意义体育评估标准(MEANPE)的定义、实施和验证。我们根据 12 位国际外部专家的评价和 250 多位职前教师(PST)的看法,对该标准进行了验证。手稿介绍了指标及其等级的有效性、对应性、制定和适当性。我们发现,在实施前和实施后,学生的得分在统计学上存在显著差异,这表明 MEANPE 评分标准是评估小学班级有意义体育活动的有效、可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Education
Frontiers in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
887
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding the complexities of financial support for students in grant-funded STEMM training programs. Viral vector-based transient expression systems for plant biotechnology research at PUIs. BUILDing pathways to health-related research careers in biomedical and behavioral sciences: a longitudinal evaluation of postbaccalaureate outcomes using a matched comparison group. Assessment of key interviewing factors for research assistants (AKIRA): development of a novel training and evaluation competency-based tool for mental health data collection in community settings. A comparison of applicant and accepted student characteristics to research training programs with implications for recruitment and selection strategy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1