Adapting to urban gardening in China: how will policymaking help migrant and native gardeners?

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1287150
Yusi Xie, Zhong Xing
{"title":"Adapting to urban gardening in China: how will policymaking help migrant and native gardeners?","authors":"Yusi Xie, Zhong Xing","doi":"10.3389/fsufs.2023.1287150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China’s current urban gardening promotion policies mainly focus on community gardens and lack in-depth research on the differentiated needs of different urban gardeners. To meet the diverse needs of China’s gardeners, this study proposes a typology that classifies gardeners into urban native and migrant ones based on their urban and rural living experiences in China. A questionnaire survey conducted in the core area of Chongqing city revealed significant differences and some similarities in gardening motivations and behaviors between urban native and migrant gardeners: (1) Although most of the gardeners approved of the value of food production and green scenery creation that Chinese urban gardening has, and disapproved of its value for family income generation, the urban native gardeners’ disapproving attitude towards family income generation, and their approval of green scenery creation were more assertive, while on the contrary, the urban migrant gardeners had a more robust approval attitude towards food production. (2) The urban native gardeners preferred proximity and small private spaces for a combination of ornamental vegetation and edible vegetables. In contrast, the urban migrated gardeners preferred larger areas for gardening in non-community spaces and leaned towards edible vegetables. (3) Both have shared motivations related to the recreation and ecological conservation values of urban gardening. Given the above differences and similarities, this paper proposes an urban gardening development strategy that meets the needs of the two types of gardeners in China, including space planning and design, operation, and management of gardening spaces, and organization of activities.","PeriodicalId":36666,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","volume":"44 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1287150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China’s current urban gardening promotion policies mainly focus on community gardens and lack in-depth research on the differentiated needs of different urban gardeners. To meet the diverse needs of China’s gardeners, this study proposes a typology that classifies gardeners into urban native and migrant ones based on their urban and rural living experiences in China. A questionnaire survey conducted in the core area of Chongqing city revealed significant differences and some similarities in gardening motivations and behaviors between urban native and migrant gardeners: (1) Although most of the gardeners approved of the value of food production and green scenery creation that Chinese urban gardening has, and disapproved of its value for family income generation, the urban native gardeners’ disapproving attitude towards family income generation, and their approval of green scenery creation were more assertive, while on the contrary, the urban migrant gardeners had a more robust approval attitude towards food production. (2) The urban native gardeners preferred proximity and small private spaces for a combination of ornamental vegetation and edible vegetables. In contrast, the urban migrated gardeners preferred larger areas for gardening in non-community spaces and leaned towards edible vegetables. (3) Both have shared motivations related to the recreation and ecological conservation values of urban gardening. Given the above differences and similarities, this paper proposes an urban gardening development strategy that meets the needs of the two types of gardeners in China, including space planning and design, operation, and management of gardening spaces, and organization of activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应中国的城市园艺:政策制定将如何帮助农民工和本地园艺师?
中国目前的城市园林绿化促进政策主要集中在社区园林,缺乏对不同城市园林绿化者差异化需求的深入研究。为了满足中国园丁的不同需求,本研究提出了一种类型学,即根据园丁在中国的城乡生活经历,将其分为城市本土园丁和流动园丁。在重庆市核心区进行的问卷调查显示,城市本土园丁和城市流动园丁在园艺动机和行为上存在显著差异和相似之处:(1)尽管大多数园丁认可中国城市园艺的粮食生产和绿化景观创造价值,不认可其为家庭创收的价值,但城市本土园丁对家庭创收的不认可态度和对绿化景观创造的认可态度更为坚定,相反,城市流动园丁对粮食生产的认可态度更为坚定。(2)城市本土园丁更喜欢就近和小型私人空间,将观赏植被和食用蔬菜相结合。相比之下,城市移民园丁更喜欢在非社区空间的较大面积上种植园艺,并倾向于食用蔬菜。(3)两者的共同动机都与城市园艺的娱乐和生态保护价值有关。鉴于以上异同,本文提出了符合中国两类园丁需求的城市园林发展战略,包括园林空间的规划设计、运营管理和活动组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
575
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Management interventions of pearl millet systems for attaining cereal self-sufficiency in Senegal Adoption of processing technologies and innovative food preservation techniques: findings from smallholders in the Lindi Region in Tanzania Adapting to urban gardening in China: how will policymaking help migrant and native gardeners? Supporting Inuit food sovereignty through collaborative research of an at-risk caribou herd Impact of irrigation on vulnerability of winter wheat under extreme climate change scenario: a case study of North China Plain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1