Examining Students’ Perceptions of Giftedness, Need for Cognition, and Goal Orientations

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Advanced Academics Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1177/1932202x231223039
M. Peters, Emily L. Mofield
{"title":"Examining Students’ Perceptions of Giftedness, Need for Cognition, and Goal Orientations","authors":"M. Peters, Emily L. Mofield","doi":"10.1177/1932202x231223039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We employed a mixed methods research design using survey data to examine gifted students’ perceptions of implicit theories of intelligence, giftedness, need for cognition, and goal orientations. Eighty-one gifted middle-school students completed the Mindset Assessment Profile (MAP) plus open-ended questions concerning giftedness, expectations, challenges, and personal goals. Results indicated that giftedness and intelligence were viewed as somewhat related ( r = .19, r = .31), but gifted students also perceived giftedness as less malleable than intelligence ( g = −.39) on some MAP items. Many perceived both intelligence and giftedness as malleable constructs that could develop through effort and opportunity. The majority expressed preference for making a good grade rather than being challenged, though many also reported a need for cognition, supported by participation in gifted programming. Participants not only provided positive connotations of giftedness, understanding its connection to challenging curricular opportunities, but also conveyed limited descriptors of giftedness such as “being smart,” providing a need to communicate domain-specific giftedness from a talent development perspective.","PeriodicalId":46535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Academics","volume":"29 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Academics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x231223039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We employed a mixed methods research design using survey data to examine gifted students’ perceptions of implicit theories of intelligence, giftedness, need for cognition, and goal orientations. Eighty-one gifted middle-school students completed the Mindset Assessment Profile (MAP) plus open-ended questions concerning giftedness, expectations, challenges, and personal goals. Results indicated that giftedness and intelligence were viewed as somewhat related ( r = .19, r = .31), but gifted students also perceived giftedness as less malleable than intelligence ( g = −.39) on some MAP items. Many perceived both intelligence and giftedness as malleable constructs that could develop through effort and opportunity. The majority expressed preference for making a good grade rather than being challenged, though many also reported a need for cognition, supported by participation in gifted programming. Participants not only provided positive connotations of giftedness, understanding its connection to challenging curricular opportunities, but also conveyed limited descriptors of giftedness such as “being smart,” providing a need to communicate domain-specific giftedness from a talent development perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察学生对资优、认知需求和目标取向的看法
我们采用了混合方法的研究设计,利用调查数据来研究资优学生对内隐性智力理论、资优、认知需求和目标取向的看法。81名资优中学生完成了心态评估档案(MAP)以及有关资优、期望、挑战和个人目标的开放式问题。结果表明,资优和智力被认为有一定关系(r = 0.19,r = 0.31),但资优学生也认为资优的可塑性低于智力(g = -0.39)。许多人认为智力和资优都是可塑的建构,可以通过努力和机会发展。大多数人表示,他们更喜欢取得好成绩,而不是接受挑战,尽管许多人也表示需要认知,并通过参加资优课程得到支持。参与者不仅提供了资优的积极内涵,理解其与具有挑战性的课程机会的联系,而且还传达了对资优的有限描述,如 "聪明",从而提供了从人才发展角度传达特定领域资优的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Academics
Journal of Advanced Academics EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Word: Relationships Course Correction: Navigating Equity in Ninth-Grade Advanced Placement Navigating AP Research: Unveiling Applied Technology High School Students’ Perspectives, Gains, and Challenges Enhancing the Professional Skills of Future Biologists Through Laboratory Training Call for Proposals: Special Issue on AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1