Linnean shortfall and space‐time patterns in species description of New World coralsnakes (Serpentes: Elapidae)

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Zoologica Scripta Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1111/zsc.12644
Lívia Estéfane Fernandes Frateles, Nelson Jorge da Silva, L. C. Terribile, J. Diniz‐Filho
{"title":"Linnean shortfall and space‐time patterns in species description of New World coralsnakes (Serpentes: Elapidae)","authors":"Lívia Estéfane Fernandes Frateles, Nelson Jorge da Silva, L. C. Terribile, J. Diniz‐Filho","doi":"10.1111/zsc.12644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The magnitude of life on Earth and human limitations hinder the understanding of even the most basic aspects of biodiversity, such as the identity of species inhabiting the Earth, the so‐called Linnean shortfall. Evaluating patterns in species description dates and their relationship with macroecological variables can help guide where taxonomic efforts should be focused. Therefore, we aim to assess the Linnean shortfall in the knowledge of New World coralsnake biodiversity. We modelled species description dates and estimated that approximately one‐third of the coralsnake diversity remains unknown. The undescribed species are evolutionarily closely related to the already described species. Moreover, recently described species in the group have more restricted geographic ranges and tend to be small‐bodied. The western Amazon and the dry diagonal (i.e. Caatinga, Cerrado, and Chaco) are the areas with the oldest description dates. However, assemblages in these areas have the largest average geographic distances to the type locality of their species, suggesting that little taxonomic effort has been dedicated intrinsically to these regions. We suggest that allocating taxonomic efforts to the dry diagonal and the use of integrative taxonomic techniques for better species delimitation are imperative to fill the Linnean shortfall for the New World coralsnakes.","PeriodicalId":49334,"journal":{"name":"Zoologica Scripta","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoologica Scripta","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The magnitude of life on Earth and human limitations hinder the understanding of even the most basic aspects of biodiversity, such as the identity of species inhabiting the Earth, the so‐called Linnean shortfall. Evaluating patterns in species description dates and their relationship with macroecological variables can help guide where taxonomic efforts should be focused. Therefore, we aim to assess the Linnean shortfall in the knowledge of New World coralsnake biodiversity. We modelled species description dates and estimated that approximately one‐third of the coralsnake diversity remains unknown. The undescribed species are evolutionarily closely related to the already described species. Moreover, recently described species in the group have more restricted geographic ranges and tend to be small‐bodied. The western Amazon and the dry diagonal (i.e. Caatinga, Cerrado, and Chaco) are the areas with the oldest description dates. However, assemblages in these areas have the largest average geographic distances to the type locality of their species, suggesting that little taxonomic effort has been dedicated intrinsically to these regions. We suggest that allocating taxonomic efforts to the dry diagonal and the use of integrative taxonomic techniques for better species delimitation are imperative to fill the Linnean shortfall for the New World coralsnakes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新世界珊瑚蛇(蛇类:Elapidae)物种描述中的林奈学缺陷和时空模式
地球上生命的规模和人类的局限性甚至阻碍了对生物多样性最基本方面的了解,例如居住在地球上的物种身份,即所谓的林奈缺失。评估物种描述日期的模式及其与宏观生态变量的关系有助于指导分类工作的重点。因此,我们旨在评估新大陆珊瑚蛇生物多样性知识中的林奈缺失。我们模拟了物种描述日期,估计约有三分之一的珊瑚蛇多样性仍然未知。未被描述的物种与已被描述的物种在进化上关系密切。此外,最近描述的该类物种的地理分布范围较为有限,而且往往体型较小。亚马逊西部和干旱对角线(即卡廷加、塞拉多和查科)是描述年代最早的地区。然而,这些地区的集合体与其物种的模式产地之间的平均地理距离最大,这表明这些地区的分类工作很少。我们建议将分类学工作分配到干旱对角线地区,并使用综合分类学技术来更好地划分物种,这对于填补林奈学派在新世界珊瑚蛇方面的空白是势在必行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zoologica Scripta
Zoologica Scripta 生物-动物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoologica Scripta publishes papers in animal systematics and phylogeny, i.e. studies of evolutionary relationships among taxa, and the origin and evolution of biological diversity. Papers can also deal with ecological interactions and geographic distributions (phylogeography) if the results are placed in a wider phylogenetic/systematic/evolutionary context. Zoologica Scripta encourages papers on the development of methods for all aspects of phylogenetic inference and biological nomenclature/classification. Articles published in Zoologica Scripta must be original and present either theoretical or empirical studies of interest to a broad audience in systematics and phylogeny. Purely taxonomic papers, like species descriptions without being placed in a wider systematic/phylogenetic context, will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Delimiting species boundaries within the Babyloniidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Neogastropoda) using multi‐locus phylogenetic analysis A non‐monophyly of ‘crowned’ Daphnia (Ctenodaphnia) Dybowski et Grochowski, 1895 (Cladocera: Daphniidae): From genomes to morphology Description of a new genus and species of deep‐sea mysids (Malacostraca, Peracarida, Mysida) from the Caroline Ridge, Northwest Pacific, with a systematic analysis of the order A phylogeographic analysis of the North American medicinal leech, Macrobdella decora (Say, 1824) Conservation genetics of barbel species (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) facing hybridization and introgression along an elevational gradient in protected areas of northern Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1