Seeing Feelingly: A Sight-Impaired Observer's Reflections on an Infant Observation during the Covid-19 Pandemic

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1111/bjp.12882
Jo Hopkins
{"title":"Seeing Feelingly: A Sight-Impaired Observer's Reflections on an Infant Observation during the Covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Jo Hopkins","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The author reflects on the experience of conducting an infant observation from their perspective of having a sight impairment encapsulated in the phrase ‘seeing feelingly’ taken from Shakespeare's play <i>King Lear.</i> The multi-sensory and somatic world of the infant is explored where sight is secondary to touch in early infancy and how this reflects something of the observer's way of experiencing the world. The impact of disability on how the author sees themselves and is seen by others is discussed in terms of the defences of projection, projective identification and disavowal. The COVID-19 pandemic and the necessity of remote observations via video link add another angle from which emotional connection is explored, leading the author to conclude that, although greater visual clarity was gained, emotional contact was diminished. The paradox of a sight-impaired person ‘observing’ challenges the privileging of the sense of sight, suggesting that a more multi-sensory approach could be of benefit to the conduct of infant observations. In addition, the very title ‘infant observation’ might deter others with sight impairment from participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"40 1","pages":"94-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author reflects on the experience of conducting an infant observation from their perspective of having a sight impairment encapsulated in the phrase ‘seeing feelingly’ taken from Shakespeare's play King Lear. The multi-sensory and somatic world of the infant is explored where sight is secondary to touch in early infancy and how this reflects something of the observer's way of experiencing the world. The impact of disability on how the author sees themselves and is seen by others is discussed in terms of the defences of projection, projective identification and disavowal. The COVID-19 pandemic and the necessity of remote observations via video link add another angle from which emotional connection is explored, leading the author to conclude that, although greater visual clarity was gained, emotional contact was diminished. The paradox of a sight-impaired person ‘observing’ challenges the privileging of the sense of sight, suggesting that a more multi-sensory approach could be of benefit to the conduct of infant observations. In addition, the very title ‘infant observation’ might deter others with sight impairment from participation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有感情地看:一位视力受损的观察者对在科维德-19 大流行期间观察婴儿的反思
作者从莎士比亚戏剧《李尔王》中 "有感觉地看 "一语所概括的视力障碍者的角度,反思了对婴儿进行观察的经历。作者探讨了婴儿的多感官和躯体世界,在婴儿早期,视觉次于触觉,这反映了观察者体验世界的方式。从投射、投射性识别和否认的防御角度,讨论了残疾对作者如何看待自己和他人如何看待自己的影响。作者还从另一个角度探讨了 COVID-19 大流行病和通过视频链接进行远程观察的必要性,从而得出结论:虽然获得了更高的视觉清晰度,但情感接触却减少了。视力受损者 "观察 "的悖论挑战了视力的优先地位,表明更多感官的方法可能对婴儿观察有益。此外,"婴儿观察 "这一称谓可能会阻碍其他视力障碍者的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - Cover and Editorial Board Introduction to Focus Point Transgender Is the Next Big Thing We Have to Really Face Psychoanalytically: What Research Can Tell Us About How Psychoanalytic, Psychodynamic and Jungian Psychotherapists Work Clinically with Transgender Clients Gender Under Scrutiny – Whose Gender? Gender Dysphoria – The Importance of In-depth Psychological Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1