Introducing Artificial Intelligence in Interpretation of Foetal Cardiotocography: Medical Dataset Curation and Preliminary Coding—An Interdisciplinary Project

IF 2.3 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.3390/mps7010005
J. L. Aeberhard, A. Radan, Ramin Abolfazl Soltani, K. Strahm, S. Schneider, Adriana Carrié, Mathieu Lemay, Jens Krauss, Ricard Delgado-Gonzalo, Daniel Surbek
{"title":"Introducing Artificial Intelligence in Interpretation of Foetal Cardiotocography: Medical Dataset Curation and Preliminary Coding—An Interdisciplinary Project","authors":"J. L. Aeberhard, A. Radan, Ramin Abolfazl Soltani, K. Strahm, S. Schneider, Adriana Carrié, Mathieu Lemay, Jens Krauss, Ricard Delgado-Gonzalo, Daniel Surbek","doi":"10.3390/mps7010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing interest in the field of medicine because of its capacity to process big data and pattern recognition. Cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used for the assessment of foetal well-being and uterine contractions during pregnancy and labour. It is characterised by inter- and intraobserver variability in interpretation, which depends on the observers’ experience. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted interpretation could improve its quality and, thus, intrapartal care. Cardiotocography (CTG) raw signals from labouring women were extracted from the database at the University Hospital of Bern between 2006 and 2019. Later, they were matched with the corresponding foetal outcomes, namely arterial umbilical cord pH and 5-min APGAR score. Excluded were deliveries where data were incomplete, as well as multiple births. Clinical data were grouped regarding foetal pH and APGAR score at 5 min after delivery. Physiological foetal pH was defined as 7.15 and above, and a 5-min APGAR score was considered physiologic when reaching ≥7. With these groups, the algorithm was trained to predict foetal hypoxia. Raw data from 19,399 CTG recordings could be exported. This was accomplished by manually searching the patient’s identification numbers (PIDs) and extracting the corresponding raw data from each episode. For some patients, only one episode per pregnancy could be found, whereas for others, up to ten episodes were available. Initially, 3400 corresponding clinical outcomes were found for the 19,399 CTGs (17.52%). Due to the small size, this dataset was rejected, and a new search strategy was elaborated. After further matching and curation, 6141 (31.65%) paired data samples could be extracted (cardiotocography raw data and corresponding maternal and foetal outcomes). Of these, half will be used to train artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, whereas the other half will be used for analysis of efficacy. Complete data could only be found for one-third of the available population. Yet, to our knowledge, this is the most exhaustive and second-largest cardiotocography database worldwide, which can be used for computer analysis and programming. A further enrichment of the database is planned.","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps7010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining increasing interest in the field of medicine because of its capacity to process big data and pattern recognition. Cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used for the assessment of foetal well-being and uterine contractions during pregnancy and labour. It is characterised by inter- and intraobserver variability in interpretation, which depends on the observers’ experience. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted interpretation could improve its quality and, thus, intrapartal care. Cardiotocography (CTG) raw signals from labouring women were extracted from the database at the University Hospital of Bern between 2006 and 2019. Later, they were matched with the corresponding foetal outcomes, namely arterial umbilical cord pH and 5-min APGAR score. Excluded were deliveries where data were incomplete, as well as multiple births. Clinical data were grouped regarding foetal pH and APGAR score at 5 min after delivery. Physiological foetal pH was defined as 7.15 and above, and a 5-min APGAR score was considered physiologic when reaching ≥7. With these groups, the algorithm was trained to predict foetal hypoxia. Raw data from 19,399 CTG recordings could be exported. This was accomplished by manually searching the patient’s identification numbers (PIDs) and extracting the corresponding raw data from each episode. For some patients, only one episode per pregnancy could be found, whereas for others, up to ten episodes were available. Initially, 3400 corresponding clinical outcomes were found for the 19,399 CTGs (17.52%). Due to the small size, this dataset was rejected, and a new search strategy was elaborated. After further matching and curation, 6141 (31.65%) paired data samples could be extracted (cardiotocography raw data and corresponding maternal and foetal outcomes). Of these, half will be used to train artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, whereas the other half will be used for analysis of efficacy. Complete data could only be found for one-third of the available population. Yet, to our knowledge, this is the most exhaustive and second-largest cardiotocography database worldwide, which can be used for computer analysis and programming. A further enrichment of the database is planned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将人工智能引入胎儿心动图解读:医学数据集整理和初步编码--一个跨学科项目
人工智能(AI)因其处理大数据和模式识别的能力而在医学领域日益受到关注。在妊娠和分娩过程中,胎儿心动图(CTG)被广泛用于评估胎儿健康状况和子宫收缩情况。其特点是观察者之间和观察者内部的解释存在差异,这取决于观察者的经验。人工智能(AI)辅助判读可提高其质量,从而改善产科护理。我们从伯尔尼大学医院的数据库中提取了 2006 年至 2019 年间产妇的心动图(CTG)原始信号。随后,将其与相应的胎儿结果(即动脉脐带 pH 值和 5 分钟 APGAR 评分)进行比对。数据不完整的分娩和多胎分娩除外。根据胎儿 pH 值和产后 5 分钟 APGAR 评分对临床数据进行分组。生理胎儿 pH 值定义为 7.15 及以上,5 分钟 APGAR 评分达到≥7 分即为生理胎儿。根据这些组别,对算法进行了预测胎儿缺氧的训练。可以导出 19,399 次 CTG 记录的原始数据。这是通过手动搜索患者的身份识别码(PID)并从每个事件中提取相应的原始数据来实现的。对于某些患者,每次妊娠只能找到一次记录,而对于其他患者,则可以找到多达十次记录。最初,为 19,399 个 CTG(17.52%)找到了 3400 个相应的临床结果。由于规模较小,该数据集被剔除,并制定了新的搜索策略。经过进一步比对和整理,可以提取出 6141 个(31.65%)配对数据样本(心动图原始数据及相应的母体和胎儿结果)。其中,一半将用于训练人工智能(AI)算法,另一半将用于疗效分析。我们只能找到现有人群中三分之一的完整数据。然而,据我们所知,这是全球最详尽和第二大的心脏排卵造影数据库,可用于计算机分析和编程。我们计划进一步丰富该数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parasitological Examination of the Digestive System of Wild Boar from a Practical Point of View-Endoparasitological Sampling under Field Conditions. Full Validation and Application to Clinical Research of a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for the Assessment of Urinary 3-Indoxyl Sulfate in Pediatric Patients with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant. A Mathematical Model of Pressure Ulcer Formation to Facilitate Prevention and Management. Evaluation of an Italian Population-Based Programme for Risk Assessment and Genetic Counselling and Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer after 10 Years of Operation: An Observational Study Protocol. The Sri Lanka Mother and Newborn Growth (S-MaNGro) Cohort: Protocol of a Nationwide Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1