Event-triggered robot self-assessment to aid in autonomy adjustment

Nicholas Conlon, Nisar Ahmed, D. Szafir
{"title":"Event-triggered robot self-assessment to aid in autonomy adjustment","authors":"Nicholas Conlon, Nisar Ahmed, D. Szafir","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2023.1294533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Human–robot teams are being called upon to accomplish increasingly complex tasks. During execution, the robot may operate at different levels of autonomy (LOAs), ranging from full robotic autonomy to full human control. For any number of reasons, such as changes in the robot’s surroundings due to the complexities of operating in dynamic and uncertain environments, degradation and damage to the robot platform, or changes in tasking, adjusting the LOA during operations may be necessary to achieve desired mission outcomes. Thus, a critical challenge is understanding when and how the autonomy should be adjusted.Methods: We frame this problem with respect to the robot’s capabilities and limitations, known as robot competency. With this framing, a robot could be granted a level of autonomy in line with its ability to operate with a high degree of competence. First, we propose a Model Quality Assessment metric, which indicates how (un)expected an autonomous robot’s observations are compared to its model predictions. Next, we present an Event-Triggered Generalized Outcome Assessment (ET-GOA) algorithm that uses changes in the Model Quality Assessment above a threshold to selectively execute and report a high-level assessment of the robot’s competency. We validated the Model Quality Assessment metric and the ET-GOA algorithm in both simulated and live robot navigation scenarios.Results: Our experiments found that the Model Quality Assessment was able to respond to unexpected observations. Additionally, our validation of the full ET-GOA algorithm explored how the computational cost and accuracy of the algorithm was impacted across several Model Quality triggering thresholds and with differing amounts of state perturbations.Discussion: Our experimental results combined with a human-in-the-loop demonstration show that Event-Triggered Generalized Outcome Assessment algorithm can facilitate informed autonomy-adjustment decisions based on a robot’s task competency.","PeriodicalId":504612,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1294533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Human–robot teams are being called upon to accomplish increasingly complex tasks. During execution, the robot may operate at different levels of autonomy (LOAs), ranging from full robotic autonomy to full human control. For any number of reasons, such as changes in the robot’s surroundings due to the complexities of operating in dynamic and uncertain environments, degradation and damage to the robot platform, or changes in tasking, adjusting the LOA during operations may be necessary to achieve desired mission outcomes. Thus, a critical challenge is understanding when and how the autonomy should be adjusted.Methods: We frame this problem with respect to the robot’s capabilities and limitations, known as robot competency. With this framing, a robot could be granted a level of autonomy in line with its ability to operate with a high degree of competence. First, we propose a Model Quality Assessment metric, which indicates how (un)expected an autonomous robot’s observations are compared to its model predictions. Next, we present an Event-Triggered Generalized Outcome Assessment (ET-GOA) algorithm that uses changes in the Model Quality Assessment above a threshold to selectively execute and report a high-level assessment of the robot’s competency. We validated the Model Quality Assessment metric and the ET-GOA algorithm in both simulated and live robot navigation scenarios.Results: Our experiments found that the Model Quality Assessment was able to respond to unexpected observations. Additionally, our validation of the full ET-GOA algorithm explored how the computational cost and accuracy of the algorithm was impacted across several Model Quality triggering thresholds and with differing amounts of state perturbations.Discussion: Our experimental results combined with a human-in-the-loop demonstration show that Event-Triggered Generalized Outcome Assessment algorithm can facilitate informed autonomy-adjustment decisions based on a robot’s task competency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
事件触发的机器人自我评估有助于自主调整
前言人类-机器人团队需要完成越来越复杂的任务。在执行过程中,机器人可能以不同的自主级别(LOA)运行,从完全机器人自主到完全人类控制。由于各种原因,如机器人在动态和不确定环境中工作的复杂性导致周围环境的变化、机器人平台的退化和损坏,或任务分配的变化等,为了实现预期的任务成果,可能有必要在操作过程中调整 LOA。因此,一个关键的挑战是了解何时以及如何调整自主性:我们根据机器人的能力和局限性(即机器人的胜任能力)来确定这一问题的框架。有了这个框架,就可以根据机器人的操作能力赋予其一定程度的自主权。首先,我们提出了模型质量评估指标,该指标显示了自主机器人的观察结果与其模型预测结果相比的(非)预期程度。接下来,我们提出了一种事件触发的广义结果评估(ET-GOA)算法,该算法利用模型质量评估中超过阈值的变化,有选择地执行并报告对机器人能力的高级评估。我们在模拟和实时机器人导航场景中验证了模型质量评估指标和 ET-GOA 算法:我们的实验发现,模型质量评估能够对意想不到的观察结果做出反应。此外,我们对完整的 ET-GOA 算法进行了验证,探索了在不同的模型质量触发阈值和不同的状态扰动量下,该算法的计算成本和准确性会受到怎样的影响:我们的实验结果结合人在回路中的演示表明,事件触发的通用结果评估算法可以根据机器人的任务能力促进做出明智的自主调整决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collective predictive coding hypothesis: symbol emergence as decentralized Bayesian inference Adaptive satellite attitude control for varying masses using deep reinforcement learning Towards reconciling usability and usefulness of policy explanations for sequential decision-making systems Semantic learning from keyframe demonstration using object attribute constraints Gaze detection as a social cue to initiate natural human-robot collaboration in an assembly task
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1