Safety and efficacy of the EndoRotor device for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis after EUS-guided cystenterostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Daryl Ramai, Zohaib Ahmed, S. Chandan, A. Facciorusso, S. Deliwala, Yaseen Alastal, A. Nawras, Marcello Maida, Monique T. Barakat, Andrea Anderloni, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of the EndoRotor device for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis after EUS-guided cystenterostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Daryl Ramai, Zohaib Ahmed, S. Chandan, A. Facciorusso, S. Deliwala, Yaseen Alastal, A. Nawras, Marcello Maida, Monique T. Barakat, Andrea Anderloni, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Debridement of infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis is indicated to treat and prevent sepsis-related multiorgan failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the EndoRotor-powered endoscopic debridement system to remove solid debris under direct endoscopic visualization. Search strategies were developed for PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 2022, in accordance with Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Outcomes of interest included technical success defined as successful use of device for debridement, clinical success defined as complete debridement and cyst resolution, and procedure-related adverse events. A random-effects model was used for analysis, and results were expressed as odds ratio along with 95% confidence interval. A total of 7 studies (n = 79 patients) were included. The mean walled-off pancreatic necrosis size was 154.6 ± 34.0 mm, whereas the mean procedure time was 71.4 minutes. The mean number of necrosectomy sessions required was 2.2 (range, 1–7). The pooled rate of clinical success was 96% (95% confidence interval, 91%–100%; I\n 2 = 0%) with a pooled technical success rate of 96% (91%–100%; I\n 2 = 0%). The pooled procedure-related adverse event rate was 8% (2%–14%; I\n 2 = 6%), which included procedure-associated bleeding, pneumoperitoneum, peritonitis, pleural effusion, and dislodgement of lumen-apposing metal stents. Our study shows that the novel EndoRotor device seems to be safe and effective for treating pancreatic necrosis. Patients undergoing endoscopic necrosectomy with the EndoRotor seem to require less debridement sessions when compared with studies using conventional instruments.","PeriodicalId":503969,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Debridement of infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis is indicated to treat and prevent sepsis-related multiorgan failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the EndoRotor-powered endoscopic debridement system to remove solid debris under direct endoscopic visualization. Search strategies were developed for PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 2022, in accordance with Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Outcomes of interest included technical success defined as successful use of device for debridement, clinical success defined as complete debridement and cyst resolution, and procedure-related adverse events. A random-effects model was used for analysis, and results were expressed as odds ratio along with 95% confidence interval. A total of 7 studies (n = 79 patients) were included. The mean walled-off pancreatic necrosis size was 154.6 ± 34.0 mm, whereas the mean procedure time was 71.4 minutes. The mean number of necrosectomy sessions required was 2.2 (range, 1–7). The pooled rate of clinical success was 96% (95% confidence interval, 91%–100%; I 2 = 0%) with a pooled technical success rate of 96% (91%–100%; I 2 = 0%). The pooled procedure-related adverse event rate was 8% (2%–14%; I 2 = 6%), which included procedure-associated bleeding, pneumoperitoneum, peritonitis, pleural effusion, and dislodgement of lumen-apposing metal stents. Our study shows that the novel EndoRotor device seems to be safe and effective for treating pancreatic necrosis. Patients undergoing endoscopic necrosectomy with the EndoRotor seem to require less debridement sessions when compared with studies using conventional instruments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EndoRotor装置治疗EUS引导下胰腺肠管造口术后胰腺壁脱落坏死的安全性和有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
对感染性胰腺壁脱落坏死进行清创可治疗和预防脓毒症相关的多器官功能衰竭。本研究旨在评估 EndoRotor 内镜清创系统在内镜直视下清除固体碎片的有效性和安全性。根据《系统综述和Meta分析的首选报告项目》和《流行病学观察性研究的Meta分析》指南,制定了从开始到2022年6月的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库检索策略。研究结果包括技术成功率(成功使用器械进行清创)、临床成功率(完全清创和囊肿消退)和手术相关不良事件。分析采用随机效应模型,结果以几率比和 95% 置信区间表示。共纳入了 7 项研究(n = 79 名患者)。胰腺壁坏死的平均大小为 154.6 ± 34.0 毫米,平均手术时间为 71.4 分钟。所需的平均坏死切除次数为 2.2 次(范围为 1-7 次)。汇总的临床成功率为 96%(95% 置信区间,91%-100%;I 2 = 0%),汇总的技术成功率为 96%(91%-100%;I 2 = 0%)。汇总的手术相关不良事件发生率为 8%(2%-14%;I 2 = 6%),包括手术相关出血、腹腔积气、腹膜炎、胸腔积液和管腔贴壁金属支架脱落。我们的研究表明,新型 EndoRotor 设备治疗胰腺坏死似乎安全有效。与使用传统器械的研究相比,使用 EndoRotor 进行内镜坏死切除术的患者所需的清创次数似乎更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
First case report of pancreatic angiomyolipoma diagnosed by EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy for biliary obstruction in near-total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y: Trials and tribulations (with videos) EUS-assisted preoperative diagnosis of immunoglobulin G4–related cholecystitis mimicking gallbladder cancer in a Mirizzi syndrome case EUS-guided pancreaticojejunostomy under gel immersion for pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stricture (with video) EUS-assisted preoperative diagnosis of immunoglobulin G4–related cholecystitis mimicking gallbladder cancer in a Mirizzi syndrome case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1