On the Evaluation of Coal Strength Alteration Induced by CO2 Injection Using Advanced Black-Box and White-Box Machine Learning Algorithms

SPE Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2118/218403-pa
Qichao Lv, Haimin Zheng, Xiaochen Li, Mohammad-Reza Mohammadi, Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam, Tongke Zhou, Atena Mahmoudzadeh, A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh
{"title":"On the Evaluation of Coal Strength Alteration Induced by CO2 Injection Using Advanced Black-Box and White-Box Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Qichao Lv, Haimin Zheng, Xiaochen Li, Mohammad-Reza Mohammadi, Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam, Tongke Zhou, Atena Mahmoudzadeh, A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh","doi":"10.2118/218403-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The injection of carbon dioxide (CO2) into coal seams is a prominent technique that can provide carbon sequestration in addition to enhancing coalbed methane extraction. However, CO2 injection into the coal seams can alter the coal strength properties and their long-term integrity. In this work, the strength alteration of coals induced by CO2 exposure was modeled using 147 laboratory-measured unconfined compressive strength (UCS) data points and considering CO2 saturation pressure, CO2 interaction temperature, CO2 interaction time, and coal rank as input variables. Advanced white-box and black-box machine learning algorithms including Gaussian process regression (GPR) with rational quadratic kernel, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), categorical boosting (CatBoost), adaptive boosting decision tree (AdaBoost-DT), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), gene expression programming (GEP), and group method of data handling (GMDH) were used in the modeling process. The results demonstrated that GPR-Rational Quadratic provided the most accurate estimates of UCS of coals having 3.53%, 3.62%, and 3.55% for the average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) values of the train, test, and total data sets, respectively. Also, the overall determination coefficient (R2) value of 0.9979 was additional proof of the excellent accuracy of this model compared with other models. Moreover, the first mathematical correlations to estimate the change in coal strength induced by CO2 exposure were established in this work by the GMDH and GEP algorithms with acceptable accuracy. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the Spearman correlation coefficient shows the relative importance of the input parameters on the coal strength better than the Pearson correlation coefficient. Among the inputs, coal rank had the greatest influence on the coal strength (strong nonlinear relationship) based on the Spearman correlation coefficient. After that, CO2 interaction time and CO2 saturation pressure have shown relatively strong nonlinear relationships with model output, respectively. The CO2 interaction temperature had the smallest impact on coal strength alteration induced by CO2 exposure based on both Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. Finally, the leverage technique revealed that the laboratory database used for modeling CO2-induced strength alteration of coals was highly reliable, and the suggested GPR-Rational Quadratic model and GMDH correlation could be applied for predicting the UCS of coals exposed to CO2 with high statistical accuracy and reliability.","PeriodicalId":510854,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/218403-pa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The injection of carbon dioxide (CO2) into coal seams is a prominent technique that can provide carbon sequestration in addition to enhancing coalbed methane extraction. However, CO2 injection into the coal seams can alter the coal strength properties and their long-term integrity. In this work, the strength alteration of coals induced by CO2 exposure was modeled using 147 laboratory-measured unconfined compressive strength (UCS) data points and considering CO2 saturation pressure, CO2 interaction temperature, CO2 interaction time, and coal rank as input variables. Advanced white-box and black-box machine learning algorithms including Gaussian process regression (GPR) with rational quadratic kernel, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), categorical boosting (CatBoost), adaptive boosting decision tree (AdaBoost-DT), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), gene expression programming (GEP), and group method of data handling (GMDH) were used in the modeling process. The results demonstrated that GPR-Rational Quadratic provided the most accurate estimates of UCS of coals having 3.53%, 3.62%, and 3.55% for the average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) values of the train, test, and total data sets, respectively. Also, the overall determination coefficient (R2) value of 0.9979 was additional proof of the excellent accuracy of this model compared with other models. Moreover, the first mathematical correlations to estimate the change in coal strength induced by CO2 exposure were established in this work by the GMDH and GEP algorithms with acceptable accuracy. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the Spearman correlation coefficient shows the relative importance of the input parameters on the coal strength better than the Pearson correlation coefficient. Among the inputs, coal rank had the greatest influence on the coal strength (strong nonlinear relationship) based on the Spearman correlation coefficient. After that, CO2 interaction time and CO2 saturation pressure have shown relatively strong nonlinear relationships with model output, respectively. The CO2 interaction temperature had the smallest impact on coal strength alteration induced by CO2 exposure based on both Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. Finally, the leverage technique revealed that the laboratory database used for modeling CO2-induced strength alteration of coals was highly reliable, and the suggested GPR-Rational Quadratic model and GMDH correlation could be applied for predicting the UCS of coals exposed to CO2 with high statistical accuracy and reliability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用先进的黑盒和白盒机器学习算法评估二氧化碳注入引起的煤炭强度变化
向煤层注入二氧化碳(CO2)是一项重要技术,除了能提高煤层气的提取率,还能起到固碳的作用。然而,向煤层注入二氧化碳会改变煤的强度特性及其长期完整性。在这项工作中,使用 147 个实验室测量的无压抗压强度(UCS)数据点,并将二氧化碳饱和压力、二氧化碳作用温度、二氧化碳作用时间和煤炭等级作为输入变量,对二氧化碳暴露引起的煤炭强度变化进行了建模。建模过程中使用了先进的白盒和黑盒机器学习算法,包括带有理二次核的高斯过程回归(GPR)、极梯度提升(XGBoost)、分类提升(CatBoost)、自适应提升决策树(AdaBoost-DT)、多元自适应回归样条(MARS)、K-近邻(KNN)、基因表达编程(GEP)和数据处理分组法(GMDH)。结果表明,GPR-有理四次方对煤炭 UCS 的估计最为准确,训练数据集、测试数据集和总数据集的平均绝对相对误差(AAPRE)值分别为 3.53%、3.62% 和 3.55%。此外,总体判定系数 (R2) 值为 0.9979,进一步证明了该模型与其他模型相比具有极高的准确性。此外,在这项工作中,GMDH 和 GEP 算法首次建立了估算二氧化碳暴露引起的煤炭强度变化的数学相关性,其准确性是可以接受的。敏感性分析表明,斯皮尔曼相关系数比皮尔逊相关系数更能显示输入参数对煤炭强度的相对重要性。根据斯皮尔曼相关系数,在输入参数中,煤炭等级对煤炭强度的影响最大(强非线性关系)。之后,CO2 作用时间和 CO2 饱和压力分别与模型输出显示出相对较强的非线性关系。根据 Pearson 和 Spearman 相关系数,CO2 作用温度对 CO2 暴露引起的煤炭强度变化的影响最小。最后,杠杆技术表明,用于模拟 CO2 诱导的煤炭强度变化的实验室数据库具有很高的可靠性,建议的 GPR 二次方模型和 GMDH 相关性可用于预测暴露于 CO2 的煤炭的 UCS,具有很高的统计准确性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rock-Breaking Characteristics of Three-Ribbed Ridge Nonplanar Polycrystalline Diamond Compact Cutter and Its Application in Plastic Formations A Two-Phase Flowback Type Curve with Fracture Damage Effects for Hydraulically Fractured Reservoirs Diffusive Leakage of scCO2 in Shaly Caprocks: Effect of Geochemical Reactivity and Anisotropy The Early Determination Method of Reservoir Drive of Oil Deposits Based on Jamalbayli Indexes Coupled Simulation of Fracture Propagation and Lagrangian Proppant Transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1