Domain-general and -specific individual difference predictors of an uncanny valley and uncanniness effects

Alexander Diel , Michael Lewis
{"title":"Domain-general and -specific individual difference predictors of an uncanny valley and uncanniness effects","authors":"Alexander Diel ,&nbsp;Michael Lewis","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Near humanlike artificial entities can appear eerie or uncanny. This <em>uncanny valley</em> is here investigated by testing five individual difference measures as predictors of uncanniness throughout a variety of stimuli. Coulrophobia predicted uncanniness of distorted faces, bodies, and androids and clowns; disgust sensitivity predicted the uncanniness of some distorted faces; the anxiety facet of neuroticism predicted the uncanniness of some distorted faces, bodies, and voices; deviancy aversion and need for structure predicted uncanniness of distorted places and voices. Taken together, the results suggest that while uncanniness can be caused by multiple, domain-independent (e.g., deviancy aversion) and domain-specific (e.g., disease avoidance) mechanisms, the uncanniness of androids specifically may be related to a fear of clowns, potentially due to a dislike of exaggerated human proportions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294988212400001X/pdfft?md5=ec2492ac22f09dff178c148ffbc1d1d7&pid=1-s2.0-S294988212400001X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294988212400001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Near humanlike artificial entities can appear eerie or uncanny. This uncanny valley is here investigated by testing five individual difference measures as predictors of uncanniness throughout a variety of stimuli. Coulrophobia predicted uncanniness of distorted faces, bodies, and androids and clowns; disgust sensitivity predicted the uncanniness of some distorted faces; the anxiety facet of neuroticism predicted the uncanniness of some distorted faces, bodies, and voices; deviancy aversion and need for structure predicted uncanniness of distorted places and voices. Taken together, the results suggest that while uncanniness can be caused by multiple, domain-independent (e.g., deviancy aversion) and domain-specific (e.g., disease avoidance) mechanisms, the uncanniness of androids specifically may be related to a fear of clowns, potentially due to a dislike of exaggerated human proportions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不思议谷和不思议效应的一般领域和特定领域个体差异预测因素
近似人类的人造实体会显得阴森恐怖或不可思议。本文通过测试五种个体差异测量方法来预测各种刺激物的不可怖程度,从而研究这种不可怖谷。恐尸症预测了扭曲的面孔、身体、机器人和小丑的不可怖性;厌恶敏感性预测了某些扭曲的面孔的不可怖性;神经质的焦虑面预测了某些扭曲的面孔、身体和声音的不可怖性;离经叛道的厌恶和对结构的需求预测了扭曲的地方和声音的不可怖性。总之,研究结果表明,虽然不可爱可能是由多种独立于领域的机制(如偏执厌恶)和特定领域的机制(如疾病回避)造成的,但具体来说,机器人的不可爱可能与对小丑的恐惧有关,这可能是由于不喜欢夸张的人体比例造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Can ChatGPT read who you are? Understanding young adults’ attitudes towards using AI chatbots for psychotherapy: The role of self-stigma Aversion against machines with complex mental abilities: The role of individual differences Differences between human and artificial/augmented intelligence in medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1