Sainte-Beuve's Quixotic Response to Hugo's Shakespeare

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1353/mlr.2024.a916727
Roger Navas-Solé
{"title":"Sainte-Beuve's Quixotic Response to Hugo's Shakespeare","authors":"Roger Navas-Solé","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2024.a916727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This article studies Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve's and Victor Hugo's clashing perspectives on Don Quijote in texts written in 1864, namely, the former's review of Doré's illustrations for the novel and the latter's Shakespeare . Considering the intellectual history between the two, the article argues that they use Don Quijote to promote their different literary and political agendas, which leads to overly complicated readings of the novel. They both interpret Sancho's way of dealing with Quijote as a metaphor for the attitude that the French nation should have towards Napoleon III, but they fundamentally disagree in their descriptions of that relationship.","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2024.a916727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article studies Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve's and Victor Hugo's clashing perspectives on Don Quijote in texts written in 1864, namely, the former's review of Doré's illustrations for the novel and the latter's Shakespeare . Considering the intellectual history between the two, the article argues that they use Don Quijote to promote their different literary and political agendas, which leads to overly complicated readings of the novel. They both interpret Sancho's way of dealing with Quijote as a metaphor for the attitude that the French nation should have towards Napoleon III, but they fundamentally disagree in their descriptions of that relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣伯夫对雨果《莎士比亚》的奇异回应
ABSTRACT: 本文研究了夏尔-奥古斯丁-圣伯夫(Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve)和维克多-雨果(Victor Hugo)在 1864 年撰写的文章中对《堂吉诃德》的冲突观点,即前者对多雷的小说插图的评论和后者对莎士比亚的评论。考虑到两人之间的思想史,文章认为他们利用《堂吉诃德》来宣传各自不同的文学和政治议程,这导致了对小说过于复杂的解读。他们都将桑丘对待吉诃德的方式解释为法国民族对拿破仑三世应有态度的隐喻,但他们对这种关系的描述却存在根本分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: With an unbroken publication record since 1905, its 1248 pages are divided between articles, predominantly on medieval and modern literature, in the languages of continental Europe, together with English (including the United States and the Commonwealth), Francophone Africa and Canada, and Latin America. In addition, MLR reviews over five hundred books each year The MLR Supplement The Modern Language Review was founded in 1905 and has included well over 3,000 articles and some 20,000 book reviews. This supplement to Volume 100 is published by the Modern Humanities Research Association in celebration of the centenary of its flagship journal.
期刊最新文献
Opak: Schatten der Erkenntnis in Paul Celans 'Meridian' und im Gedicht 'Schwanengefahr' by Chiara Caradonna (review) Baroque Sovereignty Reconsidered: Walter Benjamin Quotes Diego Saavedra Fajardo Surrealist Women's Writing: A Critical Exploration ed. by Anna Watz (review) Cultural Translations in Medieval Romance ed. by Victoria Flood and Megan G. Leitch (review) Making Italy Anglican: Why the Book of Common Prayer Was Translated into Italian by Stefano Villani (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1