Use of Drone Imagery to Predict Leaf Nitrogen Content of Sugarcane Cultivated Under Organic Fertilizer Application

U. W. L. M. Kumarasiri, U. W. A. Vitharana, T. Ariyawansha, B. Kulasekara
{"title":"Use of Drone Imagery to Predict Leaf Nitrogen Content of Sugarcane Cultivated Under Organic Fertilizer Application","authors":"U. W. L. M. Kumarasiri, U. W. A. Vitharana, T. Ariyawansha, B. Kulasekara","doi":"10.4038/tar.v35i1.8700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the potential of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based multispectral imagery (MI) to predict the leaf nitrogen (N) content of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). MI of canopy cover of two sugarcane varieties (Co 775 and SL 96 128) applied with different doses of N (0 – 550 kg/ha) were captured at 4½ months after planting. These images were used to calculate 10 different vegetation indices (VIs). Five machine learning (ML) models were tested for their potential to predict leaf N status using the most appropriate VIs. The correlation analysis showed that DVI (Difference Vegetation Index) was the most powerful VI for the prediction of leaf N (r = 0.81), followed by the RVI (Ratio Vegetation Index) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) (R2= 0.78 and 0.77, respectively). A threshold correlation (r > 0.6) was applied to select predictive variables for ML models and performance was evaluated using a validation data set of leaf N content. Individual variety testing revealed that PLSR (Partial Least Squares Regression) and SVR (Support Vector Regression) models as the best prediction models with the highest Coefficient of determination (R2>0.72) and the lowest Root Mean Square Error values (RMSE<0.11). When both variety data were pooled, RF (Random Forest) demonstrated the highest predictive performance on the validation dataset, with an R2 value of 0.66 with a RMSE value of 0.12. Generally, the prediction accuracy of models was less when data from both varieties were pooled. This study postulated the potential for the fusion of UAV MI and ML approaches to predict leaf N states and the importance of developing varietal-specific prediction models for the sugarcane vegetation.","PeriodicalId":23313,"journal":{"name":"Tropical agricultural research","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical agricultural research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v35i1.8700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based multispectral imagery (MI) to predict the leaf nitrogen (N) content of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). MI of canopy cover of two sugarcane varieties (Co 775 and SL 96 128) applied with different doses of N (0 – 550 kg/ha) were captured at 4½ months after planting. These images were used to calculate 10 different vegetation indices (VIs). Five machine learning (ML) models were tested for their potential to predict leaf N status using the most appropriate VIs. The correlation analysis showed that DVI (Difference Vegetation Index) was the most powerful VI for the prediction of leaf N (r = 0.81), followed by the RVI (Ratio Vegetation Index) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) (R2= 0.78 and 0.77, respectively). A threshold correlation (r > 0.6) was applied to select predictive variables for ML models and performance was evaluated using a validation data set of leaf N content. Individual variety testing revealed that PLSR (Partial Least Squares Regression) and SVR (Support Vector Regression) models as the best prediction models with the highest Coefficient of determination (R2>0.72) and the lowest Root Mean Square Error values (RMSE<0.11). When both variety data were pooled, RF (Random Forest) demonstrated the highest predictive performance on the validation dataset, with an R2 value of 0.66 with a RMSE value of 0.12. Generally, the prediction accuracy of models was less when data from both varieties were pooled. This study postulated the potential for the fusion of UAV MI and ML approaches to predict leaf N states and the importance of developing varietal-specific prediction models for the sugarcane vegetation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用无人机图像预测施用有机肥的甘蔗叶片含氮量
本研究调查了基于无人飞行器(UAV)的多光谱图像(MI)预测甘蔗(Saccharum officinarum L.)叶片氮(N)含量的潜力。两种甘蔗品种(Co 775 和 SL 96 128)施用不同剂量的氮(0 - 550 千克/公顷)后,在种植后 4 个半月拍摄了冠层覆盖的多光谱图像。这些图像用于计算 10 种不同的植被指数(VI)。测试了五个机器学习(ML)模型使用最合适的植被指数预测叶片氮状况的潜力。相关性分析表明,DVI(差异植被指数)是预测叶片氮最有效的植被指数(r = 0.81),其次是 RVI(比率植被指数)和 NDVI(归一化差异植被指数)(R2 分别为 0.78 和 0.77)。应用阈值相关性(r > 0.6)来选择 ML 模型的预测变量,并使用叶片氮含量的验证数据集对性能进行评估。单个品种测试表明,PLSR(部分最小二乘回归)和 SVR(支持向量回归)模型是最佳预测模型,它们具有最高的决定系数(R2>0.72)和最低的均方根误差值(RMSE<0.11)。当两个品种的数据汇集在一起时,RF(随机森林)对验证数据集的预测性能最高,R2 值为 0.66,RMSE 值为 0.12。一般来说,当两个品种的数据都集中在一起时,模型的预测准确性较低。本研究推测了无人机 MI 与 ML 方法融合预测叶片氮状态的潜力,以及开发甘蔗植被特定品种预测模型的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Production and Dietary Diversities with Seasonality in Rural Agricultural Context in Sri Lanka: A Case of Mahakanumulla Village Tank Cascade System Changes in Total and Available K Contents in Feldspar and Mica Co-pyrolyzed with Poultry Litter at Different Temperatures Introducing a ‘Postharvest Loss Index (PHLI)’ for Some Selected High Producing Vegetables in Sri Lanka to Enhance Food Security Behavioral Intention of Paddy Farmers Towards Adoption of Organic Sources for Soil Nutrient Management Consequent to Policy Decision to Ban Agro-chemicals in Sri Lanka: A Case Study Solid Formulation of Trichoderma virens for the Management of Banana Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum musae
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1